Skip to content
Triangle logo TriangleGet started
← Full study record

NCT04999085 · OUTCOME

Subject Satisfaction With Program (Acceptability)

Geriatric-assessment Interventions to Address Functional Deficits in Older Adults w Multiple Myeloma · Source last updated 2025-02-28

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEAN
Unit
score on a scale
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
3 months from enrollment

What was measured

Subject satisfaction with the intervention program, will be assessed by a single-item 5-point from 1 to 5, Likert scale response, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction and lower scores indicating less satisfaction. The mean score reported by study participants will be reported.

Analysis population: Subjects who started the study completed study interventions and followed up 3 months.

Groups in this outcome

Supportive Care

Supportive care interventions: Subjects will be referred to specialists and/or supportive care interventions based on issues/deficits identified on a baseline geriatric assessment. These interventions will be selected based on deficits or problems identified on baseline assessments. These include referral to physical/occupational therapy for those with physical deficits (Activities of Daily Living impairment, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living impairment, Timed Up and Go, or falls), to optometry/ophthalmology (for visual impairment), to audiology (for hearing impairment), to pharmacist (for polypharmacy), and to cancer center support program (for Mental Health Index 13 criteria).

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Supportive Care15

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Supportive Care4.4Not reported3.75Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        3.7
        upper Limit
        5
        value
        4.4
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      15
    units
    Participants
description
Subject satisfaction with the intervention program, will be assessed by a single-item 5-point from 1 to 5, Likert scale response, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction and lower scores indicating less satisfaction. The mean score reported by study participants will be reported.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Supportive care interventions: Subjects will be referred to specialists and/or supportive care interventions based on issues/deficits identified on a baseline geriatric assessment. These interventions will be selected based on deficits or problems identified on baseline assessments. These include referral to physical/occupational therapy for those with physical deficits (Activities of Daily Living impairment, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living impairment, Timed Up and Go, or falls), to optometry/ophthalmology (for visual impairment), to audiology (for hearing impairment), to pharmacist (for polypharmacy), and to cancer center support program (for Mental Health Index 13 criteria).
    id
    OG000
    title
    Supportive Care
param Type
MEAN
population Description
Subjects who started the study completed study interventions and followed up 3 months.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
3 months from enrollment
title
Subject Satisfaction With Program (Acceptability)
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
score on a scale

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice