Overall Population: FACT-Lym Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment
A Phase 3 Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab Compared to Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma or Marginal Zone Lymphoma. · Source last updated 2026-09-04
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEAN
Unit
scores on a scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Deviation
Time frame
up to approximately 34 months
What was measured
The FACT-Lymphoma (v4) is composed of 42 items with a 5-point Likert-type scale and 5 subscales. Physical well-being (PWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Social/family well-being (SWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Emotional well-being (EWB) subscale: 6 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-24. Functional well-being (FWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Lymphoma (LymS) subscale includes 15 items; total score = 0-60. Three total scores can be derived by adding the subscales: FACT-Lymphoma Trial Outcome Index (TOI): (PWB score) + (FWB score) + (LymS score); total score = 0-116. FACT-G total score: (PWB score) + (SWB score) + (EWB score) + (FWB score); total score = 0-108. FACT-Lymphoma total score: (PWB score) + (SWB score) + (EWB score) + (FWB score) + (LymS score); total score = 0-168. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Analysis population: Overall Full Analysis Set. As pre-specified in the Statistical Analysis Plan, the MZL population was considered as a subpopulation of interest, not a main analysis population. The FL and MZL populations were combined for analysis into the Overall population, which was a main analysis population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
Groups in this outcome
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
Participants with FL and MZL were randomized to receive tafasitamab 12 mg/kg IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycles 1 to 3 and on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 4 to 12. Participants also received oral lenalidomide (including generics) 20 mg QD, administered at approximately the same time every day on Days 1 to 21 of Cycles 1 to 12, and rituximab (including biosimilars) 375 mg/m\^2 IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 5. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 calendar days.
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
Participants with FL and MZL were randomized to receive placebo 0.9% saline solution IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycles 1 to 3 and on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 4 to 12. Participants also received oral lenalidomide (including generics) 20 mg QD, administered at approximately the same time every day on Days 1 to 21 of Cycles 1 to 12, and rituximab (including biosimilars) 375 mg/m\^2 IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 5. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 calendar days.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
326
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
328
Reported measurements
Baseline, PWB subscale
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
308
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
311
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
23.8
4.41
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
24.1
4.20
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of Treatment, PWB subscale
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
225
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
225
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
23.6
4.71
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
23.2
5.21
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Baseline, SWB subscale
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
310
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
312
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
20.8
5.82
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
20.2
6.06
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of Treatment, SWB subscale
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
223
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
223
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
20.2
5.89
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
19.8
5.34
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Baseline, EWB subscale
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
311
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
313
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
18.2
4.20
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
18.1
4.12
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of Treatment, EWB subscale
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
225
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
225
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
18.7
4.31
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
18.1
4.67
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Baseline, FWB subscale
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
311
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
312
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
17.3
6.19
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
17.3
6.08
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of Treatment, FWB subscale
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
225
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
224
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
16.8
6.29
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
16.2
6.22
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Baseline, FACT-LymS
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
310
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
312
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
47.4
8.91
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
47.6
7.98
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of Treatment, FACT-LymS
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
224
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
225
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
48.7
9.17
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
48.2
8.71
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Baseline, FACT-Lymphoma TOI
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
307
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
309
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
88.7
16.40
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
89.0
15.72
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of Treatment, FACT-Lymphoma TOI
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
224
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
222
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
89.0
17.74
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
87.4
18.14
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Baseline, FACT-G Total Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
308
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
309
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
80.2
15.39
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
79.7
15.43
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of Treatment, FACT-G Total Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
223
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
220
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
79.2
16.65
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
77.1
16.80
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Baseline, FACT-Lymphoma Total Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
307
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
308
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
127.7
22.18
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
127.3
21.57
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of Treatment, FACT-Lymphoma Total Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
222
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
220
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
127.8
24.26
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
125.2
24.18
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
4.41
value
23.8
group Id
OG001
spread
4.20
value
24.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
308
group Id
OG001
value
311
units
Participants
title
Baseline, PWB subscale
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
4.71
value
23.6
group Id
OG001
spread
5.21
value
23.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
225
group Id
OG001
value
225
units
Participants
title
End of Treatment, PWB subscale
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
5.82
value
20.8
group Id
OG001
spread
6.06
value
20.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
310
group Id
OG001
value
312
units
Participants
title
Baseline, SWB subscale
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
5.89
value
20.2
group Id
OG001
spread
5.34
value
19.8
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
223
group Id
OG001
value
223
units
Participants
title
End of Treatment, SWB subscale
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
4.20
value
18.2
group Id
OG001
spread
4.12
value
18.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
311
group Id
OG001
value
313
units
Participants
title
Baseline, EWB subscale
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
4.31
value
18.7
group Id
OG001
spread
4.67
value
18.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
225
group Id
OG001
value
225
units
Participants
title
End of Treatment, EWB subscale
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
6.19
value
17.3
group Id
OG001
spread
6.08
value
17.3
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
311
group Id
OG001
value
312
units
Participants
title
Baseline, FWB subscale
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
6.29
value
16.8
group Id
OG001
spread
6.22
value
16.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
225
group Id
OG001
value
224
units
Participants
title
End of Treatment, FWB subscale
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
8.91
value
47.4
group Id
OG001
spread
7.98
value
47.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
310
group Id
OG001
value
312
units
Participants
title
Baseline, FACT-LymS
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
9.17
value
48.7
group Id
OG001
spread
8.71
value
48.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
224
group Id
OG001
value
225
units
Participants
title
End of Treatment, FACT-LymS
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.40
value
88.7
group Id
OG001
spread
15.72
value
89.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
307
group Id
OG001
value
309
units
Participants
title
Baseline, FACT-Lymphoma TOI
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
17.74
value
89.0
group Id
OG001
spread
18.14
value
87.4
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
224
group Id
OG001
value
222
units
Participants
title
End of Treatment, FACT-Lymphoma TOI
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
326
group Id
OG001
value
328
units
Participants
description
The FACT-Lymphoma (v4) is composed of 42 items with a 5-point Likert-type scale and 5 subscales. Physical well-being (PWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Social/family well-being (SWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Emotional well-being (EWB) subscale: 6 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-24. Functional well-being (FWB) subscale: 7 items measured on 0- to 4-point scale; total score = 0-28. Lymphoma (LymS) subscale includes 15 items; total score = 0-60. Three total scores can be derived by adding the subscales: FACT-Lymphoma Trial Outcome Index (TOI): (PWB score) + (FWB score) + (LymS score); total score = 0-116. FACT-G total score: (PWB score) + (SWB score) + (EWB score) + (FWB score); total score = 0-108. FACT-Lymphoma total score: (PWB score) + (SWB score) + (EWB score) + (FWB score) + (LymS score); total score = 0-168. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Participants with FL and MZL were randomized to receive tafasitamab 12 mg/kg IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycles 1 to 3 and on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 4 to 12. Participants also received oral lenalidomide (including generics) 20 mg QD, administered at approximately the same time every day on Days 1 to 21 of Cycles 1 to 12, and rituximab (including biosimilars) 375 mg/m\^2 IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 5. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 calendar days.
id
OG000
title
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
description
Participants with FL and MZL were randomized to receive placebo 0.9% saline solution IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycles 1 to 3 and on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 4 to 12. Participants also received oral lenalidomide (including generics) 20 mg QD, administered at approximately the same time every day on Days 1 to 21 of Cycles 1 to 12, and rituximab (including biosimilars) 375 mg/m\^2 IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 5. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 calendar days.
id
OG001
title
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
param Type
MEAN
population Description
Overall Full Analysis Set. As pre-specified in the Statistical Analysis Plan, the MZL population was considered as a subpopulation of interest, not a main analysis population. The FL and MZL populations were combined for analysis into the Overall population, which was a main analysis population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
up to approximately 34 months
title
Overall Population: FACT-Lym Scores at Baseline and End of Treatment