Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT04680052 · OUTCOME

FDG-avid Overall Population: PET-CR Rate by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria

A Phase 3 Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Tafasitamab Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab Compared to Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma or Marginal Zone Lymphoma. · Source last updated 2026-09-04

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
up to approximately 34 months

What was measured

CR was defined as a complete metabolic response at any time after the start of treatment. Per PET, CR criteria: (1) score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without a residual mass on a 5-point scale for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; (2) No evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; and (3) no new lesions. PET 5-point scale: 1 = no uptake above background; 2 = uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3 = uptake \> mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4 = uptake moderately \> liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; X = new areas of uptake unlikely to be related to lymphoma. The Overall FDG-avid Set included all randomized participants with a PET scan at Baseline with a resulting Deauville score of 4 or 5.

Analysis population: Overall FDG-avid Set. As pre-specified in the Statistical Analysis Plan, the MZL population was considered as a subpopulation of interest, not a main analysis population. The FL and MZL populations were combined for analysis into the Overall population, which was a main analysis population. Participants who did not have a post-baseline PET scan were considered to be "not assessed," but were included in the analysis. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.

Groups in this outcome

FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide

Participants with FL and MZL were randomized to receive tafasitamab 12 mg/kg IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycles 1 to 3 and on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 4 to 12. Participants also received oral lenalidomide (including generics) 20 mg QD, administered at approximately the same time every day on Days 1 to 21 of Cycles 1 to 12, and rituximab (including biosimilars) 375 mg/m\^2 IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 5. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 calendar days.

FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide

Participants with FL and MZL were randomized to receive placebo 0.9% saline solution IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycles 1 to 3 and on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 4 to 12. Participants also received oral lenalidomide (including generics) 20 mg QD, administered at approximately the same time every day on Days 1 to 21 of Cycles 1 to 12, and rituximab (including biosimilars) 375 mg/m\^2 IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 5. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 calendar days.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide290
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide293

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide50.7Not reported44.7856.58Not reported
FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide41.3Not reported35.6047.17Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    1.06
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    2.03
    estimate Comment
    The strata information was based on the data obtained from the interactive response technology that was used for randomization.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Comment
    Only primary and key secondary endpoints were formally tested; this endpoint was not formally tested.
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.0221
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    1.5
    statistical Method
    stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    1.06
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    2.03
    estimate Comment
    The strata information was based on the data obtained from the interactive response technology that was used for randomization.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Comment
    Only primary and key secondary endpoints were formally tested; this endpoint was not formally tested.
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.0221
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    1.5
    statistical Method
    stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        44.78
        upper Limit
        56.58
        value
        50.7
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        35.60
        upper Limit
        47.17
        value
        41.3
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      290
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      293
    units
    Participants
description
CR was defined as a complete metabolic response at any time after the start of treatment. Per PET, CR criteria: (1) score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without a residual mass on a 5-point scale for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; (2) No evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; and (3) no new lesions. PET 5-point scale: 1 = no uptake above background; 2 = uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3 = uptake \> mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4 = uptake moderately \> liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; X = new areas of uptake unlikely to be related to lymphoma. The Overall FDG-avid Set included all randomized participants with a PET scan at Baseline with a resulting Deauville score of 4 or 5.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants with FL and MZL were randomized to receive tafasitamab 12 mg/kg IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycles 1 to 3 and on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 4 to 12. Participants also received oral lenalidomide (including generics) 20 mg QD, administered at approximately the same time every day on Days 1 to 21 of Cycles 1 to 12, and rituximab (including biosimilars) 375 mg/m\^2 IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 5. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 calendar days.
    id
    OG000
    title
    FL and MZL: Tafasitamab + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
  2. description
    Participants with FL and MZL were randomized to receive placebo 0.9% saline solution IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycles 1 to 3 and on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 4 to 12. Participants also received oral lenalidomide (including generics) 20 mg QD, administered at approximately the same time every day on Days 1 to 21 of Cycles 1 to 12, and rituximab (including biosimilars) 375 mg/m\^2 IV, administered on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 5. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 calendar days.
    id
    OG001
    title
    FL and MZL: Placebo + Rituximab + Lenalidomide
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
Overall FDG-avid Set. As pre-specified in the Statistical Analysis Plan, the MZL population was considered as a subpopulation of interest, not a main analysis population. The FL and MZL populations were combined for analysis into the Overall population, which was a main analysis population. Participants who did not have a post-baseline PET scan were considered to be "not assessed," but were included in the analysis. The 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
up to approximately 34 months
title
FDG-avid Overall Population: PET-CR Rate by Investigator Assessment, Using the Lugano 2014 Criteria
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice