NCT04608773 · OUTCOME
Oral Dryness
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEAN
- Unit
- units on a scale
- Interval / dispersion
- Standard Deviation
- Time frame
- 2 week trial period
What was measured
at the end of each study period an online questionnaire was administered. The questionnaire included continuous variables derived from the 100mm visual analog scale (VAS); documented via questionnaire completion by participants administered via Qualtrics. Dryness was measured on a 0-100 point scale "During the last three days, overall, your mouth or tongue was: 'Very Dry' = 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 = 'Not at All Dry"
Groups in this outcome
Biotene Spray
Participants who received Biotene in either the first or last two week trial period of the study.
Refresh Spray
Participants who received Refresh spray in either the first or second two week period of the study.
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Biotene Spray | 96 |
| Refresh Spray | 96 |
Reported measurements
Oral dryness Dryness baseline
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biotene Spray | 45.5 | 20.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Refresh Spray | 46.6 | 22.7 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Dryness 2 weeks
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biotene Spray | 52.76 | 19.25 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Refresh Spray | 54.1 | 21.6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Source statistical analyses
- group Description
- Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of Dry mouth score between Refresh and Biotene. ANCOVA model was performed by regressing the difference in after-treatment measurement between Refresh and Biotene over the difference of baseline between Refresh and Biotene. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05 (two- sided)
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- <0.501
- statistical Method
- ANCOVA
Complete source fields
- analyses
- group Description
- Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in change of Dry mouth score between Refresh and Biotene. ANCOVA model was performed by regressing the difference in after-treatment measurement between Refresh and Biotene over the difference of baseline between Refresh and Biotene. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05 (two- sided)
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- <0.501
- statistical Method
- ANCOVA
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 20.3
- value
- 45.5
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 22.7
- value
- 46.6
- title
- Oral dryness Dryness baseline
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 19.25
- value
- 52.76
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 21.6
- value
- 54.1
- title
- Dryness 2 weeks
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 96
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 96
- units
- Participants
- description
- at the end of each study period an online questionnaire was administered. The questionnaire included continuous variables derived from the 100mm visual analog scale (VAS); documented via questionnaire completion by participants administered via Qualtrics. Dryness was measured on a 0-100 point scale "During the last three days, overall, your mouth or tongue was: 'Very Dry' = 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 = 'Not at All Dry"
- dispersion Type
- Standard Deviation
- groups
- description
- Participants who received Biotene in either the first or last two week trial period of the study.
- id
- OG000
- title
- Biotene Spray
- description
- Participants who received Refresh spray in either the first or second two week period of the study.
- id
- OG001
- title
- Refresh Spray
- param Type
- MEAN
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- 2 week trial period
- title
- Oral Dryness
- type
- PRIMARY
- unit Of Measure
- units on a scale
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle