Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT04608773 · MORE INFO

Limitations, agreements, and source contact

Blinded Dry Mouth Spray Crossover Study · Source last updated 2024-02-01

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

certain Agreement
pi Sponsor Employee
true
restrictive Agreement
false
limitations And Caveats
description
There may be a degree of attrition bias, our modified intention-to-treat design, in which 13 patients had to be reassigned to group 1 from group 2, may have also added bias; we found no evidence of a sequence effect. The treatment effect of each spray was calculated in reference to use of water, which is known to improve oral dryness so the magnitude of the treatment effect may be underestimated, however, we would expect both products to be affected equally.
point Of Contact
email
amf91@pitt.edu
organization
University of Pittsburgh
phone
4126479665
title
Anne Fisher
Complete source fields
certain Agreement
pi Sponsor Employee
true
restrictive Agreement
false
limitations And Caveats
description
There may be a degree of attrition bias, our modified intention-to-treat design, in which 13 patients had to be reassigned to group 1 from group 2, may have also added bias; we found no evidence of a sequence effect. The treatment effect of each spray was calculated in reference to use of water, which is known to improve oral dryness so the magnitude of the treatment effect may be underestimated, however, we would expect both products to be affected equally.
point Of Contact
email
amf91@pitt.edu
organization
University of Pittsburgh
phone
4126479665
title
Anne Fisher

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice