Time to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale Score
Study of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) vs Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in HER2-low, Hormone Receptor Positive, Metastatic Breast Cancer · Source last updated 2026-03-04
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From randomization until date of first symptom deterioration that is confirmed, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)
What was measured
Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that was confirmed at next available assessment, at least 14 days apart, regardless of whether the participant withdrew from study treatment or receives another anti-cancer therapy prior to deterioration.
Analysis population: The ITT population included all randomized participants.
Groups in this outcome
T-DXd
Participants received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg via IV infusion every 3 weeks until PD, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another criterion for discontinuation was met.
Chemotherapy
Participants received Investigator's choice single-agent chemotherapy (capecitabine 1000 or 1250 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period in 3-week cycles, paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion qw in 3-week cycles or nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion qw for 3 weeks followed by 1-week rest period in 4-week cycles) until PD, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another criterion for discontinuation was met.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
T-DXd
436
Chemotherapy
430
Reported measurements
Physical Functioning
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
18.0
Not reported
15.9
NA
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Chemotherapy
9.9
Not reported
6.9
15.2
Not reported
Role Functioning
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
10.3
Not reported
6.9
14.6
Not reported
Chemotherapy
5.5
Not reported
4.1
6.9
Not reported
Emotional Functioning
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
28.2
Not reported
18.6
NA
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Chemotherapy
17.3
Not reported
12.4
NA
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Cognitive Functioning
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
11.8
Not reported
8.3
16.6
Not reported
Chemotherapy
9.9
Not reported
7.8
13.8
Not reported
Social Functioning
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
11.7
Not reported
7.6
16.3
Not reported
Chemotherapy
7.7
Not reported
6.2
10.4
Not reported
Fatigue
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
4.3
Not reported
3.4
7.7
Not reported
Chemotherapy
2.9
Not reported
2.2
4.2
Not reported
Pain
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
22.0
Not reported
17.2
NA
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Chemotherapy
6.3
Not reported
4.8
9.6
Not reported
Nausea/Vomiting
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
3.5
Not reported
2.8
5.6
Not reported
Chemotherapy
13.8
Not reported
7.7
21.5
Not reported
Global Health Status/QoL
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
11.3
Not reported
8.3
14.7
Not reported
Chemotherapy
10.5
Not reported
7.7
13.3
Not reported
Dyspnea
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
20.0
Not reported
19.3
NA
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Chemotherapy
20.8
Not reported
13.1
NA
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Loss of Appetite
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
8.3
Not reported
5.0
11.7
Not reported
Chemotherapy
13.8
Not reported
9.6
16.1
Not reported
Insomnia
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
NA
Not reported
17.3
NA
NA indicated that the median and upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Chemotherapy
15.2
Not reported
12.4
NA
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Constipation
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
9.2
Not reported
5.5
12.5
Not reported
Chemotherapy
22.0
Not reported
15.9
NA
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Diarrhea
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
T-DXd
29.0
Not reported
17.2
NA
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Chemotherapy
16.5
Not reported
13.9
23.4
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
comment
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
15.9
upper Limit
NA
value
18.0
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
6.9
upper Limit
15.2
value
9.9
title
Physical Functioning
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
6.9
upper Limit
14.6
value
10.3
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
4.1
upper Limit
6.9
value
5.5
title
Role Functioning
categories
measurements
comment
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
18.6
upper Limit
NA
value
28.2
comment
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
12.4
upper Limit
NA
value
17.3
title
Emotional Functioning
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
8.3
upper Limit
16.6
value
11.8
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
7.8
upper Limit
13.8
value
9.9
title
Cognitive Functioning
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
7.6
upper Limit
16.3
value
11.7
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
6.2
upper Limit
10.4
value
7.7
title
Social Functioning
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
3.4
upper Limit
7.7
value
4.3
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
2.2
upper Limit
4.2
value
2.9
title
Fatigue
categories
measurements
comment
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
17.2
upper Limit
NA
value
22.0
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
4.8
upper Limit
9.6
value
6.3
title
Pain
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
2.8
upper Limit
5.6
value
3.5
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
7.7
upper Limit
21.5
value
13.8
title
Nausea/Vomiting
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
8.3
upper Limit
14.7
value
11.3
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
7.7
upper Limit
13.3
value
10.5
title
Global Health Status/QoL
categories
measurements
comment
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
19.3
upper Limit
NA
value
20.0
comment
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
13.1
upper Limit
NA
value
20.8
title
Dyspnea
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
5.0
upper Limit
11.7
value
8.3
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
9.6
upper Limit
16.1
value
13.8
title
Loss of Appetite
categories
measurements
comment
NA indicated that the median and upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
group Id
OG000
lower Limit
17.3
upper Limit
NA
value
NA
comment
NA indicated that the upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
group Id
OG001
lower Limit
12.4
upper Limit
NA
value
15.2
title
Insomnia
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
436
group Id
OG001
value
430
units
Participants
description
Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that was confirmed at next available assessment, at least 14 days apart, regardless of whether the participant withdrew from study treatment or receives another anti-cancer therapy prior to deterioration.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
description
Participants received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg via IV infusion every 3 weeks until PD, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another criterion for discontinuation was met.
id
OG000
title
T-DXd
description
Participants received Investigator's choice single-agent chemotherapy (capecitabine 1000 or 1250 mg/m\^2 orally twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period in 3-week cycles, paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion qw in 3-week cycles or nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion qw for 3 weeks followed by 1-week rest period in 4-week cycles) until PD, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another criterion for discontinuation was met.
id
OG001
title
Chemotherapy
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
The ITT population included all randomized participants.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From randomization until date of first symptom deterioration that is confirmed, up to PCD of 18 March 2024 (maximum of approximately 43.85 months)
title
Time to Deterioration in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Scale Score