Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT04269200 · OUTCOME

Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST 1.1, Based on Investigator Assessments

Durvalumab With or Without Olaparib as Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Treatment of Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer · Source last updated 2026-08-07

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
Months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
At baseline, every 9 weeks (wks) up to 18 wks, then every 12 wks until objective radiological disease progression. Assessed until 12 Apr 2023 DCO (08 Jul 2024 DCO for China cohort), up to 50 months

What was measured

To demonstrate the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy by assessment of PFS (using investigator assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 \[RECIST 1.1\]) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

Analysis population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisting of all patients randomised as part of global enrolment including patients from China who were randomised before the global recruitment was closed (up to and including 20 Apr 2022). China FAS includes all patients who were randomised at sites in China and Hong Kong.

Groups in this outcome

Global Cohort - SoC

Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with durvalumab placebo (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received durvalumab placebo (IV) Q4W and olaparib placebo (tablets) twice bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.

Global Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab

Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with 1120 mg durvalumab (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received 1500 mg durvalumab (IV) Q4W with olaparib placebo (tablets) bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.

Global Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib

Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with 1120 mg durvalumab (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received 1500 mg durvalumab (IV) Q4W with 300 mg olaparib (tablets) bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.

China Cohort - SoC

Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with durvalumab placebo (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received durvalumab placebo (IV) Q4W and olaparib placebo (tablets) twice bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.

China Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab

Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with 1120 mg durvalumab (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received 1500 mg durvalumab (IV) Q4W with olaparib placebo (tablets) bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.

China Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib

Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with 1120 mg durvalumab (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received 1500 mg durvalumab (IV) Q4W with 300 mg olaparib (tablets) bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Global Cohort - SoC241
Global Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab238
Global Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib239
China Cohort - SoC44
China Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab43
China Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib42

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Global Cohort - SoC9.6Not reported9.09.9Not reported
Global Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab10.2Not reported9.714.7Not reported
Global Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib15.1Not reported12.620.7Not reported
China Cohort - SoC9.7Not reported7.612.3Not reported
China Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab9.9Not reported8.220.6Not reported
China Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib9.9Not reported7.112.6Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.57
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.89
    estimate Comment
    A hazard ratio less than 1 favours SoC + Durvalumab.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.003
    p Value Comment
    Determined using a log-rank test stratified by mismatch repair (MMR) status (proficient versus deficient) and disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.71
    statistical Comment
    Model was stratified by MMR status (proficient versus deficient) and disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    statistical Method
    Regression, Cox
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.43
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.69
    estimate Comment
    A hazard ratio less than 1 favours SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <0.0001
    p Value Comment
    Determined using a log-rank test stratified by MMR status (proficient versus deficient) and disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.55
    statistical Comment
    Model was stratified by MMR status (proficient versus deficient) and disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    statistical Method
    Regression, Cox
  3. ci Lower Limit
    0.42
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.25
    estimate Comment
    A hazard ratio less than 1 favours SoC + Durvalumab.
    group Ids
    1. OG003
    2. OG004
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value Comment
    China cohort designed to provide descriptive analysis only.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.73
    statistical Comment
    Model was stratified by disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    statistical Method
    Regression, Cox
  4. ci Lower Limit
    0.57
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.61
    estimate Comment
    A hazard ratio less than 1 favours SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib.
    group Ids
    1. OG003
    2. OG005
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value Comment
    China cohort designed to provide descriptive analysis only.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.96
    statistical Comment
    Model was stratified by disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    statistical Method
    Regression, Cox
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.57
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.89
    estimate Comment
    A hazard ratio less than 1 favours SoC + Durvalumab.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.003
    p Value Comment
    Determined using a log-rank test stratified by mismatch repair (MMR) status (proficient versus deficient) and disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.71
    statistical Comment
    Model was stratified by MMR status (proficient versus deficient) and disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    statistical Method
    Regression, Cox
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.43
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.69
    estimate Comment
    A hazard ratio less than 1 favours SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <0.0001
    p Value Comment
    Determined using a log-rank test stratified by MMR status (proficient versus deficient) and disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.55
    statistical Comment
    Model was stratified by MMR status (proficient versus deficient) and disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    statistical Method
    Regression, Cox
  3. ci Lower Limit
    0.42
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.25
    estimate Comment
    A hazard ratio less than 1 favours SoC + Durvalumab.
    group Ids
    1. OG003
    2. OG004
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value Comment
    China cohort designed to provide descriptive analysis only.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.73
    statistical Comment
    Model was stratified by disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    statistical Method
    Regression, Cox
  4. ci Lower Limit
    0.57
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.61
    estimate Comment
    A hazard ratio less than 1 favours SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib.
    group Ids
    1. OG003
    2. OG005
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value Comment
    China cohort designed to provide descriptive analysis only.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.96
    statistical Comment
    Model was stratified by disease status (recurrent versus newly diagnosed).
    statistical Method
    Regression, Cox
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        9.0
        upper Limit
        9.9
        value
        9.6
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        9.7
        upper Limit
        14.7
        value
        10.2
      3. group Id
        OG002
        lower Limit
        12.6
        upper Limit
        20.7
        value
        15.1
      4. group Id
        OG003
        lower Limit
        7.6
        upper Limit
        12.3
        value
        9.7
      5. group Id
        OG004
        lower Limit
        8.2
        upper Limit
        20.6
        value
        9.9
      6. group Id
        OG005
        lower Limit
        7.1
        upper Limit
        12.6
        value
        9.9
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      241
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      238
    3. group Id
      OG002
      value
      239
    4. group Id
      OG003
      value
      44
    5. group Id
      OG004
      value
      43
    6. group Id
      OG005
      value
      42
    units
    Participants
description
To demonstrate the efficacy of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab or durvalumab with olaparib when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy by assessment of PFS (using investigator assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 \[RECIST 1.1\]) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with durvalumab placebo (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received durvalumab placebo (IV) Q4W and olaparib placebo (tablets) twice bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Global Cohort - SoC
  2. description
    Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with 1120 mg durvalumab (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received 1500 mg durvalumab (IV) Q4W with olaparib placebo (tablets) bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Global Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab
  3. description
    Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with 1120 mg durvalumab (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received 1500 mg durvalumab (IV) Q4W with 300 mg olaparib (tablets) bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.
    id
    OG002
    title
    Global Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib
  4. description
    Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with durvalumab placebo (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received durvalumab placebo (IV) Q4W and olaparib placebo (tablets) twice bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.
    id
    OG003
    title
    China Cohort - SoC
  5. description
    Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with 1120 mg durvalumab (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received 1500 mg durvalumab (IV) Q4W with olaparib placebo (tablets) bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.
    id
    OG004
    title
    China Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab
  6. description
    Platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) Q3W for a maximum of 6 cycles with 1120 mg durvalumab (IV) Q3W. Following completion of chemotherapy treatment, patients without objective disease progression received 1500 mg durvalumab (IV) Q4W with 300 mg olaparib (tablets) bd orally as maintenance treatment until disease progression.
    id
    OG005
    title
    China Cohort - SoC + Durvalumab + Olaparib
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisting of all patients randomised as part of global enrolment including patients from China who were randomised before the global recruitment was closed (up to and including 20 Apr 2022). China FAS includes all patients who were randomised at sites in China and Hong Kong.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
At baseline, every 9 weeks (wks) up to 18 wks, then every 12 wks until objective radiological disease progression. Assessed until 12 Apr 2023 DCO (08 Jul 2024 DCO for China cohort), up to 50 months
title
Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST 1.1, Based on Investigator Assessments
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice