Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT04154189 · OUTCOME

Change From Baseline in PedsQL Scale: Cancer Module Scale Score at Month 4

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Ifosfamide and Etoposide With or Without Lenvatinib in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Relapsed and Refractory Osteosarcoma · Source last updated 2024-07-22

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEAN
Unit
score on a scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Deviation
Time frame
Baseline and Month 4

What was measured

HRQoL: PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module Scale measured pediatric cancer-specific HRQoL. It included assessment of 8 dimensions: pain and hurt (2 items), nausea (5 items), procedural anxiety (3 items), treatment anxiety (3 items), worry (3 items), cognitive problems (3 items - toddlers \[aged 2-4\], 4 items - young children \[aged 5-7\]; 5 items for children aged \>=8 years, adults), perceived physical appearance (3 items), communication (3 items). Each item was reported using a 5-point Likert scale, items were then reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Cancer Module total score: sum of all items divided by the number of items answered on all the scales. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores=better HRQoL, lower scores=worse HRQoL.

Analysis population: HRQoL Analysis Set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug and had completed at least 1 postbaseline PRO assessment. Here "overall number of participants analyzed, N" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Groups in this outcome

Treatment Arm A: Lenvatinib + Ifosfamide + Etoposide

Participants received lenvatinib 14 mg/m\^2, capsules, orally, once daily, plus ifosfamide 3000 mg/m\^2/day, intravenously and etoposide 100 mg/m\^2/day, intravenously. Ifosfamide and etoposide were administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for up to 5 cycles. Lenvatinib was administered in continuous 21-day cycles. Treatment continued until PD, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant choice, withdrawal of consent or discontinuation of study by the sponsor, whichever occurred first.

Treatment Arm B: Ifosfamide + Etoposide

Participants received ifosfamide 3000 mg/m\^2/day, intravenously and etoposide 100 mg/m\^2/day, intravenously on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for up to 5 cycles. Participants who had PD per RECIST v1.1 were eligible for an optional lenvatinib treatment (14 mg/m\^2, capsules, orally, once daily in continuous 21-day cycles until next PD, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant choice, withdrawal of consent or discontinuation of study by the sponsor, whichever occurred first) plus any remaining cycles of chemotherapy if 5 cycles were not completed prior to PD.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Treatment Arm A: Lenvatinib + Ifosfamide + Etoposide16
Treatment Arm B: Ifosfamide + Etoposide4

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Treatment Arm A: Lenvatinib + Ifosfamide + Etoposide2.669.989Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Treatment Arm B: Ifosfamide + Etoposide2.086.736Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        spread
        9.989
        value
        2.66
      2. group Id
        OG001
        spread
        6.736
        value
        2.08
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      16
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      4
    units
    Participants
description
HRQoL: PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module Scale measured pediatric cancer-specific HRQoL. It included assessment of 8 dimensions: pain and hurt (2 items), nausea (5 items), procedural anxiety (3 items), treatment anxiety (3 items), worry (3 items), cognitive problems (3 items - toddlers \[aged 2-4\], 4 items - young children \[aged 5-7\]; 5 items for children aged \>=8 years, adults), perceived physical appearance (3 items), communication (3 items). Each item was reported using a 5-point Likert scale, items were then reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Cancer Module total score: sum of all items divided by the number of items answered on all the scales. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores=better HRQoL, lower scores=worse HRQoL.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
  1. description
    Participants received lenvatinib 14 mg/m\^2, capsules, orally, once daily, plus ifosfamide 3000 mg/m\^2/day, intravenously and etoposide 100 mg/m\^2/day, intravenously. Ifosfamide and etoposide were administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for up to 5 cycles. Lenvatinib was administered in continuous 21-day cycles. Treatment continued until PD, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant choice, withdrawal of consent or discontinuation of study by the sponsor, whichever occurred first.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Treatment Arm A: Lenvatinib + Ifosfamide + Etoposide
  2. description
    Participants received ifosfamide 3000 mg/m\^2/day, intravenously and etoposide 100 mg/m\^2/day, intravenously on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for up to 5 cycles. Participants who had PD per RECIST v1.1 were eligible for an optional lenvatinib treatment (14 mg/m\^2, capsules, orally, once daily in continuous 21-day cycles until next PD, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant choice, withdrawal of consent or discontinuation of study by the sponsor, whichever occurred first) plus any remaining cycles of chemotherapy if 5 cycles were not completed prior to PD.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Treatment Arm B: Ifosfamide + Etoposide
param Type
MEAN
population Description
HRQoL Analysis Set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug and had completed at least 1 postbaseline PRO assessment. Here "overall number of participants analyzed, N" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline and Month 4
title
Change From Baseline in PedsQL Scale: Cancer Module Scale Score at Month 4
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
score on a scale

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice