NCT03951220 · OUTCOME
Post-Hoc Analysis: Relationship Between Intercurrent Chemotherapy and Baseline Magnetic Resonance (MR) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Measurements
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEAN
- Unit
- s/mm^2 (ADC measurement unit)
- Interval / dispersion
- Standard Deviation
- Time frame
- At baseline
What was measured
We first addressed an important practical limitation of the study design. Patients with new myeloma usually commenced chemotherapy imminently after their diagnosis, typically a few months before they were able to consent for the present study. Therefore, most patients had already started chemotherapy at the point of baseline novel Magnetic Resonance (MR) scan, and had received variable durations of chemotherapy at baseline and follow-up scans. We hypothesised that this may be a potential confounding factor, as more recent chemotherapy may reduce tumour cellularity and therefore increase diffusion \[and therefore Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measurements\] at lytic bone lesions. In this particular section, we analysed the difference between baseline ADC measurements in patients with new and relapsed myeloma, grouped by time elapsed since chemotherapy (ongoing, recent or never chemotherapy).
Analysis population: Analysis included patients from Groups 1a and 1b who had a novel MR scan at baseline, with a lytic bone lesion identified amenable to ADC measurement.
Groups in this outcome
Group 1a: New Myeloma
All patients with new myeloma at recruitment.
Group 1b: Relapsed Myeloma
All patients with relapsed myeloma at recruitment.
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Group 1a: New Myeloma | 11 |
| Group 1b: Relapsed Myeloma | 6 |
Reported measurements
Baseline ADC: Ongoing Chemotherapy
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Group 1a: New Myeloma | 9 |
| Group 1b: Relapsed Myeloma | 3 |
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1a: New Myeloma | 1084.5 | 432.5 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Group 1b: Relapsed Myeloma | 1215.3 | 319.4 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Baseline ADC: Recent (<1yr) Chemotherapy
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Group 1a: New Myeloma | 0 |
| Group 1b: Relapsed Myeloma | 3 |
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1b: Relapsed Myeloma | 751.7 | 134.8 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Baseline ADC: Never Chemotherapy
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Group 1a: New Myeloma | 2 |
| Group 1b: Relapsed Myeloma | 0 |
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1a: New Myeloma | 547.5 | 74.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 432.5
- value
- 1084.5
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 319.4
- value
- 1215.3
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 9
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 3
- units
- Participants
- title
- Baseline ADC: Ongoing Chemotherapy
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 134.8
- value
- 751.7
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 0
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 3
- units
- Participants
- title
- Baseline ADC: Recent (<1yr) Chemotherapy
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 74.2
- value
- 547.5
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 2
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 0
- units
- Participants
- title
- Baseline ADC: Never Chemotherapy
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 11
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 6
- units
- Participants
- description
- We first addressed an important practical limitation of the study design. Patients with new myeloma usually commenced chemotherapy imminently after their diagnosis, typically a few months before they were able to consent for the present study. Therefore, most patients had already started chemotherapy at the point of baseline novel Magnetic Resonance (MR) scan, and had received variable durations of chemotherapy at baseline and follow-up scans. We hypothesised that this may be a potential confounding factor, as more recent chemotherapy may reduce tumour cellularity and therefore increase diffusion \[and therefore Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measurements\] at lytic bone lesions. In this particular section, we analysed the difference between baseline ADC measurements in patients with new and relapsed myeloma, grouped by time elapsed since chemotherapy (ongoing, recent or never chemotherapy).
- dispersion Type
- Standard Deviation
- groups
- description
- All patients with new myeloma at recruitment.
- id
- OG000
- title
- Group 1a: New Myeloma
- description
- All patients with relapsed myeloma at recruitment.
- id
- OG001
- title
- Group 1b: Relapsed Myeloma
- param Type
- MEAN
- population Description
- Analysis included patients from Groups 1a and 1b who had a novel MR scan at baseline, with a lytic bone lesion identified amenable to ADC measurement.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- At baseline
- title
- Post-Hoc Analysis: Relationship Between Intercurrent Chemotherapy and Baseline Magnetic Resonance (MR) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Measurements
- type
- POST_HOC
- unit Of Measure
- s/mm^2 (ADC measurement unit)
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle