NCT03951220 · OUTCOME
Secondary Outcome 2: Detect Longitudinal Changes in Bone Microarchitecture With Therapy (% Change in Bone Turnover Markers)
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEAN
- Unit
- Ratio (follow-up divided by baseline)
- Interval / dispersion
- Standard Deviation
- Time frame
- Comparison between baseline and follow-up at 6month
What was measured
Secondary Objective 2: To assess whether the novel Magnetic Resonance (MR) protocol and exploratory bone biomarkers can improve detection of longitudinal changes in bone loss in patients with myeloma (new, relapsed, smouldering) and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) during therapy, compared to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and established bone biomarkers alone. This section examined whether longitudinal change in bone turnover markers differed by chemotherapy responders vs non-responders. * The % change in bone biomarker measurements was expressed as a ratio of follow-up / baseline of paired measurements * Participants were classified by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Group classification, as responder (partial response, very good partial response or complete response) or non-responder (stable, progressive or relapse).
Analysis population: Pooled cohort of participants from Groups 1 and 2 who had a IMWG response classification (responder vs non-responder) and paired serum bone turnover markers measured at baseline and follow-up.
Groups in this outcome
% Change in P1NP
% Change in measurements of P1NP (Procollagen type 1 N-terminal Propeptide).
% Change in CTX-1
% Change in measurements of CTX-1 (Type I Collagen Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide).
% Change in ALP
% Change in measurements of ALP (Alkaline Phosphatase).
% Change in DKK1
% Change in measurements of DKK1 (Dickkopf WNT Signaling Pathway Inhibitor 1).
% Change in Sclerostin
% Change in measurements of sclerostin.
% Change in RANKL:OPG
% Change in measurements of the ratio between RANKL and OPG (osteoprotegerin).
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| % Change in P1NP | 30 |
| % Change in CTX-1 | 30 |
| % Change in ALP | 32 |
| % Change in DKK1 | 30 |
| % Change in Sclerostin | 31 |
| % Change in RANKL:OPG | 29 |
Reported measurements
IMWG Responder
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| % Change in P1NP | 15 |
| % Change in CTX-1 | 15 |
| % Change in ALP | 17 |
| % Change in DKK1 | 15 |
| % Change in Sclerostin | 16 |
| % Change in RANKL:OPG | 15 |
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change in P1NP | 0.94 | 0.75 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| % Change in CTX-1 | 0.89 | 0.73 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| % Change in ALP | 0.85 | 0.22 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| % Change in DKK1 | 0.63 | 0.40 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| % Change in Sclerostin | 1.22 | 0.64 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| % Change in RANKL:OPG | 1.09 | 0.81 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
IMWG Non-Responder
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| % Change in P1NP | 15 |
| % Change in CTX-1 | 15 |
| % Change in ALP | 15 |
| % Change in DKK1 | 15 |
| % Change in Sclerostin | 15 |
| % Change in RANKL:OPG | 14 |
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change in P1NP | 0.95 | 0.21 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| % Change in CTX-1 | 1.18 | 0.51 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| % Change in ALP | 0.98 | 0.23 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| % Change in DKK1 | 1.15 | 0.59 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| % Change in Sclerostin | 1.18 | 0.41 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| % Change in RANKL:OPG | 1.51 | 1.04 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Source statistical analyses
- group Ids
- OG003
- non Inferiority Type
- OTHER
- p Value
- 0.007
- statistical Method
- Mann-Whitney test
Complete source fields
- analyses
- group Ids
- OG003
- non Inferiority Type
- OTHER
- p Value
- 0.007
- statistical Method
- Mann-Whitney test
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 0.75
- value
- 0.94
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 0.73
- value
- 0.89
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 0.22
- value
- 0.85
- group Id
- OG003
- spread
- 0.40
- value
- 0.63
- group Id
- OG004
- spread
- 0.64
- value
- 1.22
- group Id
- OG005
- spread
- 0.81
- value
- 1.09
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 15
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 15
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 17
- group Id
- OG003
- value
- 15
- group Id
- OG004
- value
- 16
- group Id
- OG005
- value
- 15
- units
- Participants
- title
- IMWG Responder
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 0.21
- value
- 0.95
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 0.51
- value
- 1.18
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 0.23
- value
- 0.98
- group Id
- OG003
- spread
- 0.59
- value
- 1.15
- group Id
- OG004
- spread
- 0.41
- value
- 1.18
- group Id
- OG005
- spread
- 1.04
- value
- 1.51
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 15
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 15
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 15
- group Id
- OG003
- value
- 15
- group Id
- OG004
- value
- 15
- group Id
- OG005
- value
- 14
- units
- Participants
- title
- IMWG Non-Responder
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 30
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 30
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 32
- group Id
- OG003
- value
- 30
- group Id
- OG004
- value
- 31
- group Id
- OG005
- value
- 29
- units
- Participants
- description
- Secondary Objective 2: To assess whether the novel Magnetic Resonance (MR) protocol and exploratory bone biomarkers can improve detection of longitudinal changes in bone loss in patients with myeloma (new, relapsed, smouldering) and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) during therapy, compared to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and established bone biomarkers alone. This section examined whether longitudinal change in bone turnover markers differed by chemotherapy responders vs non-responders. * The % change in bone biomarker measurements was expressed as a ratio of follow-up / baseline of paired measurements * Participants were classified by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Group classification, as responder (partial response, very good partial response or complete response) or non-responder (stable, progressive or relapse).
- dispersion Type
- Standard Deviation
- groups
- description
- % Change in measurements of P1NP (Procollagen type 1 N-terminal Propeptide).
- id
- OG000
- title
- % Change in P1NP
- description
- % Change in measurements of CTX-1 (Type I Collagen Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide).
- id
- OG001
- title
- % Change in CTX-1
- description
- % Change in measurements of ALP (Alkaline Phosphatase).
- id
- OG002
- title
- % Change in ALP
- description
- % Change in measurements of DKK1 (Dickkopf WNT Signaling Pathway Inhibitor 1).
- id
- OG003
- title
- % Change in DKK1
- description
- % Change in measurements of sclerostin.
- id
- OG004
- title
- % Change in Sclerostin
- description
- % Change in measurements of the ratio between RANKL and OPG (osteoprotegerin).
- id
- OG005
- title
- % Change in RANKL:OPG
- param Type
- MEAN
- population Description
- Pooled cohort of participants from Groups 1 and 2 who had a IMWG response classification (responder vs non-responder) and paired serum bone turnover markers measured at baseline and follow-up.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Comparison between baseline and follow-up at 6month
- title
- Secondary Outcome 2: Detect Longitudinal Changes in Bone Microarchitecture With Therapy (% Change in Bone Turnover Markers)
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Ratio (follow-up divided by baseline)
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle