Skip to content
Triangle logo TriangleGet started
← Full study record

NCT03703297 · OUTCOME

Durvalumab Versus Placebo: Overall Survival (OS)

Study of Durvalumab + Tremelimumab, Durvalumab, and Placebo in Limited Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Patients Who Have Not Progressed Following Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy · Source last updated 2025-11-21

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to DCO date 15 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 1936 days)

What was measured

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Median OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Analysis population: The FAS included all randomized participants.

Groups in this outcome

Durvalumab

Participants received durvalumab monotherapy (1500 mg for participants \>30 kg in weight and a weight-based dosing equivalent to 20 mg/kg for participants \<=30 kg in weight) via IV infusion once q4w, until clinical/RECIST 1.1-defined radiological progression, intolerable toxicity, or for a maximum of 24 months, whichever occurred first.

Placebo

Participants received matching placebo via IV infusion once q4w for 4 doses/cycles each, until clinical/RECIST 1.1-defined radiological progression, intolerable toxicity, or for a maximum of 24 months, whichever occurred first.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Durvalumab264
Placebo266

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Durvalumab55.9Not reported37.3NANA indicates that upper limit of CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events at the DCO.
Placebo33.4Not reported25.539.9Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.569
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.928
    estimate Comment
    Hazard ratio and CI were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for receipt of PCI, with treatment as only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.01042
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.73
    statistical Comment
    The analysis was performed using the stratified log-rank test.
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.569
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.928
    estimate Comment
    Hazard ratio and CI were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for receipt of PCI, with treatment as only covariate and ties handled by Efron approach.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.01042
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.73
    statistical Comment
    The analysis was performed using the stratified log-rank test.
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. comment
        NA indicates that upper limit of CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events at the DCO.
        group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        37.3
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        55.9
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        25.5
        upper Limit
        39.9
        value
        33.4
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      264
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      266
    units
    Participants
description
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Median OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and its CI using Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received durvalumab monotherapy (1500 mg for participants \>30 kg in weight and a weight-based dosing equivalent to 20 mg/kg for participants \<=30 kg in weight) via IV infusion once q4w, until clinical/RECIST 1.1-defined radiological progression, intolerable toxicity, or for a maximum of 24 months, whichever occurred first.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Durvalumab
  2. description
    Participants received matching placebo via IV infusion once q4w for 4 doses/cycles each, until clinical/RECIST 1.1-defined radiological progression, intolerable toxicity, or for a maximum of 24 months, whichever occurred first.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Placebo
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
The FAS included all randomized participants.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to DCO date 15 January 2024 (a maximum of approximately 1936 days)
title
Durvalumab Versus Placebo: Overall Survival (OS)
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice