NCT03674112 · OUTCOME
Change From Baseline Over Time in the Financial Difficulties Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
A Study to Evaluate Patient Preference and Satisfaction of Subcutaneous Administration of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Participants With HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer · Source last updated 2024-01-02
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEAN
- Unit
- score on a scale
- Interval / dispersion
- Standard Deviation
- Time frame
- Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1); Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, and 15 (or last treatment cycle; each cycle is 21 days); 1.5, 2, and 3 years (up to 3 years)
What was measured
The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions covering treatment-related symptoms, functioning, and GHS/HRQoL. Questions were answered by participants on a scale from 1 to 4 or 1 to 7. Raw scores were transformed to scale scores that ranged from 0 to 100 where a higher scale score indicating a higher response (i.e., on the functioning and GHS/QoL scales a higher score meant better functioning/QoL, whereas on the symptom scales a higher score meant greater \[worse\] symptoms). The EORTC QLQ-C30 data was scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers 2001). In the event of incomplete data, for all questionnaire subscales, if more than 50% of the constituent items are completed, a pro-rated score was to be computed consistent with the scoring manuals and published validation reports. For subscales with less than 50% of the items completed, the subscale was to be considered as missing.
Analysis population: The Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Evaluable Population includes all participants in the ITT population with a baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment and at least one post-baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment. The number analyzed at a given timepoint indicates participants with non-missing data at that timepoint.
Groups in this outcome
All Participants
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, all participants received their first 6 cycles of treatment in accordance with the study arm to which they were randomized: Arm A) pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days); or Arm B) PH FDC SC for 3 treatment cycles followed by P+H IV for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm A first received pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm B first received the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles followed by pertuzumab intravenous (IV) and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 159 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 79 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 80 |
|---|
Reported measurements
Baseline (BL): Value at Visit
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 159 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 79 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 80 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 22.85 | 27.59 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 23.63 | 27.30 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 22.08 | 28.04 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at Cycle 3 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 158 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 78 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 80 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -2.95 | 22.38 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -2.99 | 20.23 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -2.92 | 24.42 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 155 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 76 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 79 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -2.15 | 22.69 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -4.39 | 20.61 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 0.00 | 24.46 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at Cycle 15 or Last Treatment Cycle
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 142 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 71 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 71 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -8.45 | 25.24 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -8.45 | 25.02 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -8.45 | 25.65 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at 1.5 Years
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 146 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 72 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 74 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -12.56 | 28.27 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -13.89 | 30.00 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -11.26 | 26.62 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at 2 Years
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 146 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 73 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 73 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -14.38 | 27.93 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -15.98 | 27.84 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -12.79 | 28.13 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at 3 Years
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 133 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 68 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 65 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -11.53 | 30.99 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -14.71 | 32.26 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -8.21 | 29.48 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 27.59
- value
- 22.85
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 27.30
- value
- 23.63
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 28.04
- value
- 22.08
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 159
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 79
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 80
- units
- Participants
- title
- Baseline (BL): Value at Visit
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 22.38
- value
- -2.95
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 20.23
- value
- -2.99
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 24.42
- value
- -2.92
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 158
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 78
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 80
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at Cycle 3 Day 1
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 22.69
- value
- -2.15
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 20.61
- value
- -4.39
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 24.46
- value
- 0.00
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 155
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 76
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 79
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at Cycle 6 Day 1
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 25.24
- value
- -8.45
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 25.02
- value
- -8.45
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 25.65
- value
- -8.45
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 142
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 71
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 71
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at Cycle 15 or Last Treatment Cycle
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 28.27
- value
- -12.56
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 30.00
- value
- -13.89
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 26.62
- value
- -11.26
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 146
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 72
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 74
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at 1.5 Years
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 27.93
- value
- -14.38
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 27.84
- value
- -15.98
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 28.13
- value
- -12.79
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 146
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 73
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 73
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at 2 Years
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 30.99
- value
- -11.53
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 32.26
- value
- -14.71
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 29.48
- value
- -8.21
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 133
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 68
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 65
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at 3 Years
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 159
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 79
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 80
- units
- Participants
- description
- The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions covering treatment-related symptoms, functioning, and GHS/HRQoL. Questions were answered by participants on a scale from 1 to 4 or 1 to 7. Raw scores were transformed to scale scores that ranged from 0 to 100 where a higher scale score indicating a higher response (i.e., on the functioning and GHS/QoL scales a higher score meant better functioning/QoL, whereas on the symptom scales a higher score meant greater \[worse\] symptoms). The EORTC QLQ-C30 data was scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers 2001). In the event of incomplete data, for all questionnaire subscales, if more than 50% of the constituent items are completed, a pro-rated score was to be computed consistent with the scoring manuals and published validation reports. For subscales with less than 50% of the items completed, the subscale was to be considered as missing.
- dispersion Type
- Standard Deviation
- groups
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, all participants received their first 6 cycles of treatment in accordance with the study arm to which they were randomized: Arm A) pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days); or Arm B) PH FDC SC for 3 treatment cycles followed by P+H IV for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG000
- title
- All Participants
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm A first received pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG001
- title
- A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm B first received the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles followed by pertuzumab intravenous (IV) and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG002
- title
- B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV
- param Type
- MEAN
- population Description
- The Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Evaluable Population includes all participants in the ITT population with a baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment and at least one post-baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment. The number analyzed at a given timepoint indicates participants with non-missing data at that timepoint.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1); Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, and 15 (or last treatment cycle; each cycle is 21 days); 1.5, 2, and 3 years (up to 3 years)
- title
- Change From Baseline Over Time in the Financial Difficulties Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- score on a scale
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice