NCT03674112 · OUTCOME
Change From Baseline Over Time in the Cognitive Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
A Study to Evaluate Patient Preference and Satisfaction of Subcutaneous Administration of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Participants With HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer · Source last updated 2024-01-02
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEAN
- Unit
- score on a scale
- Interval / dispersion
- Standard Deviation
- Time frame
- Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1); Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, and 15 (or last treatment cycle; each cycle is 21 days); 1.5, 2, and 3 years (up to 3 years)
What was measured
The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions covering treatment-related symptoms, functioning, and GHS/HRQoL. Questions were answered by participants on a scale from 1 to 4 or 1 to 7. Raw scores were transformed to scale scores that ranged from 0 to 100 where a higher scale score indicating a higher response (i.e., on the functioning and GHS/QoL scales a higher score meant better functioning/QoL, whereas on the symptom scales a higher score meant greater \[worse\] symptoms). The EORTC QLQ-C30 data was scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers 2001). In the event of incomplete data, for all questionnaire subscales, if more than 50% of the constituent items are completed, a pro-rated score was to be computed consistent with the scoring manuals and published validation reports. For subscales with less than 50% of the items completed, the subscale was to be considered as missing.
Analysis population: The Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Evaluable Population includes all participants in the ITT population with a baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment and at least one post-baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment. The number analyzed at a given timepoint indicates participants with non-missing data at that timepoint.
Groups in this outcome
All Participants
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, all participants received their first 6 cycles of treatment in accordance with the study arm to which they were randomized: Arm A) pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days); or Arm B) PH FDC SC for 3 treatment cycles followed by P+H IV for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm A first received pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm B first received the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles followed by pertuzumab intravenous (IV) and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 159 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 79 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 80 |
|---|
Reported measurements
Baseline (BL): Value at Visit
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 159 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 79 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 80 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 85.22 | 18.37 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 85.86 | 17.92 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 84.58 | 18.90 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at Cycle 3 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 158 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 78 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 80 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -0.95 | 19.21 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -0.64 | 17.08 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -1.25 | 21.18 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 155 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 76 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 79 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -2.47 | 20.44 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -3.29 | 18.86 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -1.69 | 21.94 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at Cycle 15 or Last Treatment Cycle
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 142 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 71 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 71 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -4.69 | 22.58 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -7.75 | 21.79 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -1.64 | 23.09 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at 1.5 Years
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 146 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 72 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 74 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -1.94 | 21.31 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -3.47 | 20.16 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -0.45 | 22.41 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at 2 Years
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 146 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 73 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 73 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -1.03 | 21.10 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -2.51 | 20.54 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 0.46 | 21.69 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at 3 Years
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 133 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 68 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 65 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | -3.01 | 23.64 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -2.45 | 20.42 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -3.59 | 26.76 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 18.37
- value
- 85.22
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 17.92
- value
- 85.86
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 18.90
- value
- 84.58
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 159
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 79
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 80
- units
- Participants
- title
- Baseline (BL): Value at Visit
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 19.21
- value
- -0.95
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 17.08
- value
- -0.64
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 21.18
- value
- -1.25
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 158
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 78
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 80
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at Cycle 3 Day 1
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 20.44
- value
- -2.47
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 18.86
- value
- -3.29
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 21.94
- value
- -1.69
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 155
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 76
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 79
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at Cycle 6 Day 1
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 22.58
- value
- -4.69
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 21.79
- value
- -7.75
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 23.09
- value
- -1.64
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 142
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 71
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 71
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at Cycle 15 or Last Treatment Cycle
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 21.31
- value
- -1.94
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 20.16
- value
- -3.47
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 22.41
- value
- -0.45
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 146
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 72
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 74
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at 1.5 Years
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 21.10
- value
- -1.03
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 20.54
- value
- -2.51
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 21.69
- value
- 0.46
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 146
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 73
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 73
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at 2 Years
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 23.64
- value
- -3.01
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 20.42
- value
- -2.45
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 26.76
- value
- -3.59
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 133
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 68
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 65
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at 3 Years
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 159
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 79
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 80
- units
- Participants
- description
- The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions covering treatment-related symptoms, functioning, and GHS/HRQoL. Questions were answered by participants on a scale from 1 to 4 or 1 to 7. Raw scores were transformed to scale scores that ranged from 0 to 100 where a higher scale score indicating a higher response (i.e., on the functioning and GHS/QoL scales a higher score meant better functioning/QoL, whereas on the symptom scales a higher score meant greater \[worse\] symptoms). The EORTC QLQ-C30 data was scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers 2001). In the event of incomplete data, for all questionnaire subscales, if more than 50% of the constituent items are completed, a pro-rated score was to be computed consistent with the scoring manuals and published validation reports. For subscales with less than 50% of the items completed, the subscale was to be considered as missing.
- dispersion Type
- Standard Deviation
- groups
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, all participants received their first 6 cycles of treatment in accordance with the study arm to which they were randomized: Arm A) pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days); or Arm B) PH FDC SC for 3 treatment cycles followed by P+H IV for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG000
- title
- All Participants
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm A first received pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG001
- title
- A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm B first received the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles followed by pertuzumab intravenous (IV) and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG002
- title
- B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV
- param Type
- MEAN
- population Description
- The Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Evaluable Population includes all participants in the ITT population with a baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment and at least one post-baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment. The number analyzed at a given timepoint indicates participants with non-missing data at that timepoint.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1); Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, and 15 (or last treatment cycle; each cycle is 21 days); 1.5, 2, and 3 years (up to 3 years)
- title
- Change From Baseline Over Time in the Cognitive Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- score on a scale
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice