NCT03674112 · OUTCOME
Change From Baseline Over Time in the Emotional Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
A Study to Evaluate Patient Preference and Satisfaction of Subcutaneous Administration of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Participants With HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer · Source last updated 2024-01-02
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEAN
- Unit
- score on a scale
- Interval / dispersion
- Standard Deviation
- Time frame
- Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1); Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, and 15 (or last treatment cycle; each cycle is 21 days); 1.5, 2, and 3 years (up to 3 years)
What was measured
The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions covering treatment-related symptoms, functioning, and GHS/HRQoL. Questions were answered by participants on a scale from 1 to 4 or 1 to 7. Raw scores were transformed to scale scores that ranged from 0 to 100 where a higher scale score indicating a higher response (i.e., on the functioning and GHS/QoL scales a higher score meant better functioning/QoL, whereas on the symptom scales a higher score meant greater \[worse\] symptoms). The EORTC QLQ-C30 data was scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers 2001). In the event of incomplete data, for all questionnaire subscales, if more than 50% of the constituent items are completed, a pro-rated score was to be computed consistent with the scoring manuals and published validation reports. For subscales with less than 50% of the items completed, the subscale was to be considered as missing.
Analysis population: The Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Evaluable Population includes all participants in the ITT population with a baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment and at least one post-baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment. The number analyzed at a given timepoint indicates participants with non-missing data at that timepoint.
Groups in this outcome
All Participants
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, all participants received their first 6 cycles of treatment in accordance with the study arm to which they were randomized: Arm A) pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days); or Arm B) PH FDC SC for 3 treatment cycles followed by P+H IV for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm A first received pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm B first received the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles followed by pertuzumab intravenous (IV) and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 159 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 79 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 80 |
|---|
Reported measurements
Baseline (BL): Value at Visit
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 159 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 79 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 80 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 82.08 | 17.72 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 82.07 | 16.99 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 82.08 | 18.52 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at Cycle 3 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 158 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 78 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 80 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 0.05 | 15.92 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -1.28 | 15.26 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 1.35 | 16.53 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 155 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 76 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 79 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 0.32 | 18.70 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 0.99 | 20.04 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | -0.32 | 17.42 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at Cycle 15 or Last Treatment Cycle
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 142 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 71 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 71 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 0.65 | 19.60 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | -1.17 | 15.77 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 2.46 | 22.77 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at 1.5 Years
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 146 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 72 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 74 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 2.45 | 22.47 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 0.93 | 23.05 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 3.94 | 21.95 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at 2 Years
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 146 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 73 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 73 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 1.86 | 23.78 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 2.74 | 21.61 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 0.99 | 25.89 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from BL at 3 Years
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 133 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 68 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 65 |
|---|
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 2.38 | 23.78 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 3.55 | 21.08 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 1.15 | 26.43 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 17.72
- value
- 82.08
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 16.99
- value
- 82.07
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 18.52
- value
- 82.08
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 159
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 79
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 80
- units
- Participants
- title
- Baseline (BL): Value at Visit
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 15.92
- value
- 0.05
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 15.26
- value
- -1.28
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 16.53
- value
- 1.35
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 158
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 78
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 80
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at Cycle 3 Day 1
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 18.70
- value
- 0.32
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 20.04
- value
- 0.99
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 17.42
- value
- -0.32
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 155
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 76
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 79
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at Cycle 6 Day 1
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 19.60
- value
- 0.65
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 15.77
- value
- -1.17
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 22.77
- value
- 2.46
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 142
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 71
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 71
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at Cycle 15 or Last Treatment Cycle
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 22.47
- value
- 2.45
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 23.05
- value
- 0.93
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 21.95
- value
- 3.94
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 146
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 72
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 74
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at 1.5 Years
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 23.78
- value
- 1.86
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 21.61
- value
- 2.74
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 25.89
- value
- 0.99
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 146
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 73
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 73
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at 2 Years
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 23.78
- value
- 2.38
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 21.08
- value
- 3.55
- group Id
- OG002
- spread
- 26.43
- value
- 1.15
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 133
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 68
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 65
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from BL at 3 Years
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 159
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 79
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 80
- units
- Participants
- description
- The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions covering treatment-related symptoms, functioning, and GHS/HRQoL. Questions were answered by participants on a scale from 1 to 4 or 1 to 7. Raw scores were transformed to scale scores that ranged from 0 to 100 where a higher scale score indicating a higher response (i.e., on the functioning and GHS/QoL scales a higher score meant better functioning/QoL, whereas on the symptom scales a higher score meant greater \[worse\] symptoms). The EORTC QLQ-C30 data was scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers 2001). In the event of incomplete data, for all questionnaire subscales, if more than 50% of the constituent items are completed, a pro-rated score was to be computed consistent with the scoring manuals and published validation reports. For subscales with less than 50% of the items completed, the subscale was to be considered as missing.
- dispersion Type
- Standard Deviation
- groups
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, all participants received their first 6 cycles of treatment in accordance with the study arm to which they were randomized: Arm A) pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days); or Arm B) PH FDC SC for 3 treatment cycles followed by P+H IV for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG000
- title
- All Participants
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm A first received pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG001
- title
- A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm B first received the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles followed by pertuzumab intravenous (IV) and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG002
- title
- B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV
- param Type
- MEAN
- population Description
- The Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Evaluable Population includes all participants in the ITT population with a baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment and at least one post-baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment. The number analyzed at a given timepoint indicates participants with non-missing data at that timepoint.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1); Day 1 of Cycles 3, 6, and 15 (or last treatment cycle; each cycle is 21 days); 1.5, 2, and 3 years (up to 3 years)
- title
- Change From Baseline Over Time in the Emotional Functioning Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- score on a scale
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice