NCT03674112 · OUTCOME
Percentage of Responses From Participants to the Two Main Reasons for Their Preferred Method of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab Administration, as Assessed in Question 3 of the Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ)
A Study to Evaluate Patient Preference and Satisfaction of Subcutaneous Administration of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Participants With HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer · Source last updated 2024-01-02
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- NUMBER
- Unit
- Percentage of responses
- Interval / dispersion
- Not reported
- Time frame
- Cycle 6 Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days)
What was measured
In Question 3 of the PPQ, participants who reported a preference for one of the two administration routes in Question 1 of the PPQ were asked to provide the two main reasons for their preference. The five available options for a participant's response were: Feels less emotionally distressing; Requires less time in the clinic; Lower level of injection-site pain; Feels more comfortable during administration; and Other reason.
Analysis population: Modified ITT (mITT) Population; for Question 3, the number analyzed for the two main reasons for SC or IV preference represents the participants who indicated in their responses to Question 1 of the PPQ that they preferred the SC or IV route of administration, respectively.
Groups in this outcome
All Participants
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, all participants received their first 6 cycles of treatment in accordance with the study arm to which they were randomized: Arm A) pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days); or Arm B) PH FDC SC for 3 treatment cycles followed by P+H IV for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm A first received pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV
In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm B first received the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles followed by pertuzumab intravenous (IV) and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 158 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 80 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 78 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 324 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 160 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 164 |
|---|
Reported measurements
SC Preference: Feels Less Emotionally Distressing
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 136 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 70 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 66 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 282 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 143 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 139 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of responses · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 16.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 14.7 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 18.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
SC Preference: Requires Less Time in the Clinic
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 136 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 70 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 66 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 282 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 143 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 139 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of responses · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 42.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 42.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 42.4 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
SC Preference: Lower Level of Injection-Site Pain
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 136 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 70 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 66 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 282 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 143 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 139 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of responses · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 11.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 9.8 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 12.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
SC Preference: Feels More Comfortable During Administration
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 136 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 70 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 66 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 282 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 143 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 139 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of responses · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 25.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 28.7 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 23.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
SC Preference: Other Reason
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 136 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 70 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 66 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 282 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 143 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 139 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of responses · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 4.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 4.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 3.6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
IV Preference: Feels Less Emotionally Distressing
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 22 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 10 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 12 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 42 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 17 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 25 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of responses · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 16.7 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 17.6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 16.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
IV Preference: Requires Less Time in the Clinic
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 22 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 10 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 12 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 42 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 17 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 25 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of responses · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 4.8 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 5.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 4.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
IV Preference: Lower Level of Injection-Site Pain
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 22 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 10 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 12 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 42 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 17 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 25 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of responses · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 26.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 23.5 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 28.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
IV Preference: Feels More Comfortable During Administration
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 22 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 10 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 12 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 42 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 17 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 25 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of responses · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 33.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 47.1 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 24.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
IV Preference: Other Reason
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 22 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 10 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 12 |
|---|
Analysis denominator · Responses
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| All Participants | 42 |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 17 |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 25 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of responses · Interval/dispersion: Not reported| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| All Participants | 19.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC | 5.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV | 28.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 16.3
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 14.7
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 18.0
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 136
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 70
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 66
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 282
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 143
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 139
- units
- Responses
- title
- SC Preference: Feels Less Emotionally Distressing
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 42.2
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 42.0
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 42.4
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 136
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 70
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 66
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 282
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 143
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 139
- units
- Responses
- title
- SC Preference: Requires Less Time in the Clinic
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 11.3
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 9.8
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 12.9
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 136
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 70
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 66
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 282
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 143
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 139
- units
- Responses
- title
- SC Preference: Lower Level of Injection-Site Pain
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 25.9
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 28.7
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 23.0
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 136
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 70
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 66
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 282
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 143
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 139
- units
- Responses
- title
- SC Preference: Feels More Comfortable During Administration
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 4.3
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 4.9
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 3.6
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 136
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 70
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 66
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 282
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 143
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 139
- units
- Responses
- title
- SC Preference: Other Reason
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 16.7
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 17.6
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 16.0
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 22
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 10
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 12
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 42
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 17
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 25
- units
- Responses
- title
- IV Preference: Feels Less Emotionally Distressing
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 4.8
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 5.9
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 4.0
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 22
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 10
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 12
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 42
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 17
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 25
- units
- Responses
- title
- IV Preference: Requires Less Time in the Clinic
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 26.2
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 23.5
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 28.0
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 22
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 10
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 12
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 42
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 17
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 25
- units
- Responses
- title
- IV Preference: Lower Level of Injection-Site Pain
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 33.3
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 47.1
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 24.0
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 22
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 10
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 12
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 42
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 17
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 25
- units
- Responses
- title
- IV Preference: Feels More Comfortable During Administration
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 19.0
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 5.9
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 28.0
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 22
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 10
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 12
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 42
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 17
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 25
- units
- Responses
- title
- IV Preference: Other Reason
- denom Units Selected
- Responses
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 158
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 80
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 78
- units
- Participants
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 324
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 160
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 164
- units
- Responses
- description
- In Question 3 of the PPQ, participants who reported a preference for one of the two administration routes in Question 1 of the PPQ were asked to provide the two main reasons for their preference. The five available options for a participant's response were: Feels less emotionally distressing; Requires less time in the clinic; Lower level of injection-site pain; Feels more comfortable during administration; and Other reason.
- groups
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, all participants received their first 6 cycles of treatment in accordance with the study arm to which they were randomized: Arm A) pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days); or Arm B) PH FDC SC for 3 treatment cycles followed by P+H IV for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG000
- title
- All Participants
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm A first received pertuzumab IV and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles followed by the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG001
- title
- A: P+H IV Followed by PH FDC SC
- description
- In the Treatment Cross-Over Period of the study, participants randomized to Arm B first received the pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous administration (PH FDC SC) for 3 treatment cycles followed by pertuzumab intravenous (IV) and trastuzumab IV (P+H IV) administration for 3 treatment cycles (1 cycle = 21 days). Following completion of this study period, participants chose one of the two study treatments to receive in the Treatment Continuation Period for the remaining anti-HER2 treatment cycles (18 planned cycles in total, including pre-study neoadjuvant treatment). After completing study treatment, participants entered the Follow-up Period wherein they were to be followed for 3 years from the date the last participant was randomized.
- id
- OG002
- title
- B: PH FDC SC Followed by P+H IV
- param Type
- NUMBER
- population Description
- Modified ITT (mITT) Population; for Question 3, the number analyzed for the two main reasons for SC or IV preference represents the participants who indicated in their responses to Question 1 of the PPQ that they preferred the SC or IV route of administration, respectively.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Cycle 6 Day 1 (each cycle is 21 days)
- title
- Percentage of Responses From Participants to the Two Main Reasons for Their Preferred Method of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab Administration, as Assessed in Question 3 of the Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ)
- type
- SECONDARY
- type Units Analyzed
- Responses
- unit Of Measure
- Percentage of responses
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice