Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT03606174 · OUTCOME

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

A Phase 2 Study of Sitravatinib in Combination With PD-(L)1 Checkpoint Inhibitor Regimens in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma · Source last updated 2023-08-24

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
Unit
Participants
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
Up to approximately 3 years

What was measured

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) was defined as the number of participants documented to have a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), per RECIST V1.1, documented during at least 1 on-study assessment. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must have decreased to normal size (short axis \< 10 mm). PR was defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. SD was defined as target lesions increasing by less than 20% from the nadir, but enough that a previously documented 30% decrease no longer holds.

Analysis population: Measured in the Full Analysis Set, which included participants who received ≥ 1 dose of each study treatment drug (ie, ≥ 1 dose of both sitravatinib and nivolumab for Cohorts 1 to 8, or ≥ 1 dose each of sitravatinib, pembrolizumab, and enfortumab vedotin for Cohort 9). Per the statistical analysis plan (SAP), Cohort 9 arms are grouped as pre-specified as there was never intent to compare efficacy endpoints across Cohort 9 dose levels.

Groups in this outcome

Cohort 1

Participants with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) with documented disease progression on or after previous anti-programmed cell death (PD)-ligand(L)-1 as most recent treatment, and who were previously treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 1. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules once daily (QD) in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an intravenous (IV) infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg once every 2 weeks (Q2W) or 480 mg once every 4 weeks (Q4W), at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab US Prescribing Information (USPI).

Cohort 2

Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented disease progression on or after previous anti-PD-L-1 as most recent treatment, and who were considered ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 2. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.

Cohort 3

Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented disease progression on or after a previous anti PD-(L)1 as the most recent treatment, who previously received (in combination or separately) other selected immunotherapies, and who were previously treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 3. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.

Cohort 4

Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented disease progression on or after a previous anti-PD-(L)1 as the most recent treatment, who previously received (in combination or separately) other selected immunotherapies, and who were considered ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 4. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.

Cohort 5

Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC who had not previously received an anti-PD-(L)1, and who were previously treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 5. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.

Cohort 6

Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC who had not previously received an anti-PD-(L)1, and who were considered ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 6. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.

Cohort 7

Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented disease progression on or after a previous anti PD-(L)1 and antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) (in combination or separately, and in any order), and who were previously treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 7. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 100 mg malate capsules, or 120 mg free base capsule formulation QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.

Cohort 8

Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented disease progression on or after a previous anti PD-(L)1 and ADC (in combination or separately, and in any order), and who were considered ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 8. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 100 mg malate capsules, or 120 mg free base capsule formulation QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.

Cohort 9

Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC who had previously received a PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) and a platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 9, which included a lead-in dose-escalation part. A dose-expansion part was planned, but was not enrolled. During the lead-in dose-escalation part, participants were enrolled to 3 dose levels of sitravatinib in combination with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin. Sitravatinib was received orally via capsules QD in 21-day cycles at doses 35 mg and 70 mg. Pembrolizumab was received as an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W), in accordance with the current pembrolizumab USPI. Enfortumab vedotin dosing was based on participant weight, starting at 1.25 mg/kg up to 125 mg/kg QD, with a dose de-escalation step to 1 mg/kg. Enfortumab vedotin was received as an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Cohort 149
Cohort 223
Cohort 318
Cohort 49
Cohort 553
Cohort 627
Cohort 756
Cohort 89
Cohort 916

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Cohort 132Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cohort 219Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cohort 312Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cohort 47Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cohort 535Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cohort 617Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cohort 733Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cohort 86Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cohort 910Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        32
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        19
      3. group Id
        OG002
        value
        12
      4. group Id
        OG003
        value
        7
      5. group Id
        OG004
        value
        35
      6. group Id
        OG005
        value
        17
      7. group Id
        OG006
        value
        33
      8. group Id
        OG007
        value
        6
      9. group Id
        OG008
        value
        10
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      49
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      23
    3. group Id
      OG002
      value
      18
    4. group Id
      OG003
      value
      9
    5. group Id
      OG004
      value
      53
    6. group Id
      OG005
      value
      27
    7. group Id
      OG006
      value
      56
    8. group Id
      OG007
      value
      9
    9. group Id
      OG008
      value
      16
    units
    Participants
description
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) was defined as the number of participants documented to have a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), per RECIST V1.1, documented during at least 1 on-study assessment. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must have decreased to normal size (short axis \< 10 mm). PR was defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. SD was defined as target lesions increasing by less than 20% from the nadir, but enough that a previously documented 30% decrease no longer holds.
groups
  1. description
    Participants with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) with documented disease progression on or after previous anti-programmed cell death (PD)-ligand(L)-1 as most recent treatment, and who were previously treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 1. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules once daily (QD) in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an intravenous (IV) infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg once every 2 weeks (Q2W) or 480 mg once every 4 weeks (Q4W), at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab US Prescribing Information (USPI).
    id
    OG000
    title
    Cohort 1
  2. description
    Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented disease progression on or after previous anti-PD-L-1 as most recent treatment, and who were considered ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 2. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Cohort 2
  3. description
    Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented disease progression on or after a previous anti PD-(L)1 as the most recent treatment, who previously received (in combination or separately) other selected immunotherapies, and who were previously treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 3. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.
    id
    OG002
    title
    Cohort 3
  4. description
    Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented disease progression on or after a previous anti-PD-(L)1 as the most recent treatment, who previously received (in combination or separately) other selected immunotherapies, and who were considered ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 4. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.
    id
    OG003
    title
    Cohort 4
  5. description
    Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC who had not previously received an anti-PD-(L)1, and who were previously treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 5. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.
    id
    OG004
    title
    Cohort 5
  6. description
    Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC who had not previously received an anti-PD-(L)1, and who were considered ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 6. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 120 mg capsules QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.
    id
    OG005
    title
    Cohort 6
  7. description
    Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented disease progression on or after a previous anti PD-(L)1 and antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) (in combination or separately, and in any order), and who were previously treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 7. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 100 mg malate capsules, or 120 mg free base capsule formulation QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.
    id
    OG006
    title
    Cohort 7
  8. description
    Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented disease progression on or after a previous anti PD-(L)1 and ADC (in combination or separately, and in any order), and who were considered ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 8. Participants received sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab. Sitravatinib was received orally via 100 mg malate capsules, or 120 mg free base capsule formulation QD in 28-day cycles. Nivolumab was received via an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, at the discretion of the Investigator and in accordance with the current nivolumab USPI.
    id
    OG007
    title
    Cohort 8
  9. description
    Participants with locally advanced or metastatic UC who had previously received a PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) and a platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled into Cohort 9, which included a lead-in dose-escalation part. A dose-expansion part was planned, but was not enrolled. During the lead-in dose-escalation part, participants were enrolled to 3 dose levels of sitravatinib in combination with pembrolizumab and enfortumab vedotin. Sitravatinib was received orally via capsules QD in 21-day cycles at doses 35 mg and 70 mg. Pembrolizumab was received as an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) at 200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W), in accordance with the current pembrolizumab USPI. Enfortumab vedotin dosing was based on participant weight, starting at 1.25 mg/kg up to 125 mg/kg QD, with a dose de-escalation step to 1 mg/kg. Enfortumab vedotin was received as an IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes (± 5 minutes) on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.
    id
    OG008
    title
    Cohort 9
param Type
COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
population Description
Measured in the Full Analysis Set, which included participants who received ≥ 1 dose of each study treatment drug (ie, ≥ 1 dose of both sitravatinib and nivolumab for Cohorts 1 to 8, or ≥ 1 dose each of sitravatinib, pembrolizumab, and enfortumab vedotin for Cohort 9). Per the statistical analysis plan (SAP), Cohort 9 arms are grouped as pre-specified as there was never intent to compare efficacy endpoints across Cohort 9 dose levels.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Up to approximately 3 years
title
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
Participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice