NCT03595657 · OUTCOME
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Investigators
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- NUMBER
- Unit
- Percentage of participants
- Interval / dispersion
- 95% Confidence Interval
- Time frame
- From enrollment to end of follow-up, a median of 29 months
What was measured
ORR assessed by investigators according to Criteria for Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Lugano 2014 Classification
Analysis population: One patient was excluded from the efficacy analysis set because the patient was not confirmed as ENKTL by central pathology.
Groups in this outcome
R/R ENKTL
Participants received sugemalimab (CS1001) 1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W)
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| R/R ENKTL | 79 |
Reported measurements
Source class 1
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R/R ENKTL | 45.6 | Not reported | 34.3 | 57.2 | Not reported |
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 34.3
- upper Limit
- 57.2
- value
- 45.6
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 79
- units
- Participants
- description
- ORR assessed by investigators according to Criteria for Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Lugano 2014 Classification
- dispersion Type
- 95% Confidence Interval
- groups
- description
- Participants received sugemalimab (CS1001) 1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W)
- id
- OG000
- title
- R/R ENKTL
- param Type
- NUMBER
- population Description
- One patient was excluded from the efficacy analysis set because the patient was not confirmed as ENKTL by central pathology.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- From enrollment to end of follow-up, a median of 29 months
- title
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Investigators
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Percentage of participants
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Independent clinical review pending · Not medical advice
Triangle