Skip to content
← Study library

NCT03552965 · REGISTRY CONDITION SEARCH

Margin-Based Vs. Robust Photon Radiotherapy Planning in IMRT of HN-SQCC

Found through the registry condition index, not selected as a treatment recommendation. This discovery collection was restricted to studies with posted results.

Phase
NA
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2025-09-02

This is a research study to evaluate the quality of life and amount of dry mouth experienced as a result of radiotherapy in subjects who have squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HN-SQCC). This study will compare the side effects experienced based on the method to plan radiotherapy, Margin Based or Robust.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Histological documentation of Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (HN-SQCC) * Older than 21 years of age * Subject is eligible for routine chemo-radiotherapy for treatment of HN-SQCC * Informed consent is obtained * Karnofsky performance of at least 70 points Exclusion Criteria: * Women with a positive urine pregnancy test are excluded from this study; women of childbearing potential must agree to refrain from breast feeding and practice adequate contraception * Unable to comply with study procedures * Use of saliva stimulating prescription drugs such as Evoxac or Salagen * Unable to receive standard chemotherapy
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
21 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    This arm will receive Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) that was calculated by introducing a margin to the target area.
    intervention Names
    1. Other: Margin-Based Radiotherapy planning
    label
    Margin-Based Radiotherapy Planning
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
  2. description
    This arm will receive Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) that was calculated to minimize the dose of radiation to normal tissue.
    intervention Names
    1. Other: Robust Radiotherapy planning
    label
    Robust Radiotherapy Planning
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Robust Radiotherapy Planning
    description
    Investigator will plan Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) using calculations that minimize the dose of radiation to normal tissue
    name
    Robust Radiotherapy planning
    type
    OTHER
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Margin-Based Radiotherapy Planning
    description
    Investigator will plan Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) using calculations that introduce a margin to the target area
    name
    Margin-Based Radiotherapy planning
    type
    OTHER
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Enrollment
count
23
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    Self reported dry mouth using Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force -Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENT/SOMA) scale. LENT/SOMA measures xerostomia in 4 stages. This ranges from Stage 1 "occasional dryness" through Stage 4 "complete dryness, debilitating". Lower stage values indicate a more favorable outcome than higher stage values.
    measure
    Grade of Xerostomia
    time Frame
    Baseline
  2. description
    Self reported dry mouth using Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force -Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENT/SOMA) scale. LENT/SOMA measures xerostomia in 4 stages. This ranges from Stage 1 "occasional dryness" through Stage 4 "complete dryness, debilitating". Lower stage values indicate a more favorable outcome than higher stage values.
    measure
    Grade of Xerostomia
    time Frame
    Month 3 (i.e., 3 months (+/- 30 days) after baseline visit)
  3. description
    Self reported dry mouth using Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force -Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENT/SOMA) scale. LENT/SOMA measures xerostomia in 4 stages. This ranges from Stage 1 "occasional dryness" through Stage 4 "complete dryness, debilitating". Lower stage values indicate a more favorable outcome than higher stage values.
    measure
    Grade of Xerostomia
    time Frame
    Month 6 (i.e., 6 months (+/- 30 days) after baseline visit)
  4. description
    Self reported dry mouth using Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force -Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENT/SOMA) scale. LENT/SOMA measures xerostomia in 4 stages. This ranges from Stage 1 "occasional dryness" through Stage 4 "complete dryness, debilitating". Lower stage values indicate a more favorable outcome than higher stage values.
    measure
    Grade of Xerostomia
    time Frame
    Month 9 (i.e., 9 months (+/- 30 days) after baseline visit)
  5. description
    Self reported dry mouth using Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force -Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENT/SOMA) scale. LENT/SOMA measures xerostomia in 4 stages. This ranges from Stage 1 "occasional dryness" through Stage 4 "complete dryness, debilitating". Lower stage values indicate a more favorable outcome than higher stage values.
    measure
    Grade of Xerostomia
    time Frame
    Month 12 (i.e., 12 months (+/- 30 days) after baseline visit)
  6. description
    Self reported dry mouth using University of Michigan's Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ). This questionnaire has 8 questions that measure the degree to which xerostomia is affecting quality of life. Patients rate each item on a scale from 0 to 10. Higher score denotes worse xerostomia. To analyze the XQ, scores on its 8 items will be summed for each subject at each time point to produce an overall XQ score whose values theoretically can range from 0 to 80; it will be treated as a continuous variable. Lower values indicate a more favorable outcome than higher values.
    measure
    Prevalence of Xerostomia
    time Frame
    Baseline
  7. description
    Self reported dry mouth using University of Michigan's Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ). This questionnaire has 8 questions that measure the degree to which xerostomia is affecting quality of life. Patients rate each item on a scale from 0 to 10. Higher score denotes worse xerostomia. To analyze the XQ, scores on its 8 items will be summed for each subject at each time point to produce an overall XQ score whose values theoretically can range from 0 to 80; it will be treated as a continuous variable. Lower values indicate a more favorable outcome than higher values.
    measure
    Prevalence of Xerostomia
    time Frame
    Month 3 (i.e., 3 months (+/- 30 days) after baseline visit)
  8. description
    Self reported dry mouth using University of Michigan's Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ). This questionnaire has 8 questions that measure the degree to which xerostomia is affecting quality of life. Patients rate each item on a scale from 0 to 10. Higher score denotes worse xerostomia. To analyze the XQ, scores on its 8 items will be summed for each subject at each time point to produce an overall XQ score whose values theoretically can range from 0 to 80; it will be treated as a continuous variable. Lower values indicate a more favorable outcome than higher values.
    measure
    Prevalence of Xerostomia
    time Frame
    Month 6 (i.e., 6 months (+/- 30 days) after baseline visit)
  9. description
    Self reported dry mouth using University of Michigan's Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ). This questionnaire has 8 questions that measure the degree to which xerostomia is affecting quality of life. Patients rate each item on a scale from 0 to 10. Higher score denotes worse xerostomia. To analyze the XQ, scores on its 8 items will be summed for each subject at each time point to produce an overall XQ score whose values theoretically can range from 0 to 80; it will be treated as a continuous variable. Lower values indicate a more favorable outcome than higher values.
    measure
    Prevalence of Xerostomia
    time Frame
    Month 9 (i.e., 9 months (+/- 30 days) after baseline visit)
  10. description
    Self reported dry mouth using University of Michigan's Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ). This questionnaire has 8 questions that measure the degree to which xerostomia is affecting quality of life. Patients rate each item on a scale from 0 to 10. Higher score denotes worse xerostomia. To analyze the XQ, scores on its 8 items will be summed for each subject at each time point to produce an overall XQ score whose values theoretically can range from 0 to 80; it will be treated as a continuous variable. Lower values indicate a more favorable outcome than higher values.
    measure
    Prevalence of Xerostomia
    time Frame
    Month 12 (i.e., 12 months (+/- 30 days) after baseline visit)
Full study description
brief Summary
This is a research study to evaluate the quality of life and amount of dry mouth experienced as a result of radiotherapy in subjects who have squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HN-SQCC). This study will compare the side effects experienced based on the method to plan radiotherapy, Margin Based or Robust.
detailed Description
This is a prospective randomized pilot clinical trial, stratified by primary tumor site, to evaluate the degree of xerostomia and quality of life (QOL) in subjects with HN-SQCC treated with radiation therapy under margin-based and robust radiotherapy treatment plans. Margin-based plans will use both biological (biological optimization) and physical objectives whereas robust planning will use physical objectives for sparing of the parotid glands. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and standard chemotherapy will be used. QOL (quality of life) will be measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 questionnaire and EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 (head and neck) module before radiotherapy (baseline) and then 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after radiotherapy. Xerostomia will be measured in study subjects using two patient-reported scoring systems completed by each subject before radiotherapy and then 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after radiotherapy: Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA) LENT/SOMA grading system and the University of Michigan's Xerostomia Questionnaire (XQ). The data collected by this randomized pilot clinical trial will be used to inform the design of, and decision-making for, future larger studies that seek to compare different methods of radiotherapy planning in the treatment of HN-SQCC.
Source references
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-1336d216cbd1bbff780dac70
      edge id
      nct-edge-78178829dd8badfe8e48
      requested nct id
      NCT03552965
      primary nct id
      NCT03552965
      source kind
      ctgov_condition_query
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      38e97f6c23d7b292911d062dea3fc0dffbdcbde03aae232fe8d067fdd28034c9
      payload sha256
      724969e766aee1feb56d50c0e15712a08c7718eff355f6466b70c8dc49611c85
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      condition_index_match_asserted_by_registry_not_reviewed
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-78178829dd8badfe8e48
      link basis
      returned_by_explicit_condition_and_posted_results_filter_query
      nct id
      NCT03552965
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        NCT03552965
        end
        11
        exact text
        NCT03552965
        start
        0
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      query cond
      Salivary Gland Cancer
      query disease state id
      ds-salivary-gland-cancer
      source file
      /Users/arunverma/Documents/ChatGPT/Cancer Statistics Website/research-data/2026-09-10/clinicaltrials-condition/round-0000/raw/cond-salivary-gland-cancer-000.json
      source file sha256
      38e97f6c23d7b292911d062dea3fc0dffbdcbde03aae232fe8d067fdd28034c9
      source json pointer
      /studies/23/protocolSection/identificationModule/nctId
      source kind
      ctgov_condition_query
      source record id
      Source null
      source string basis
      parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
      source string sha256
      711a129862696df4f6104959bba65cdeac389a00b692cd327ca7edd030115738

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice