Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Score at Days 7, 28, 56, 78, 100, 128, 156, 184, 212, 240, 268, 296, 324, 352, 380
A Study of JNJ-68284528, a Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy Directed Against B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma · Source last updated 2025-07-30
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
PGIS was a single item to assess severity of pain on a 5-point verbal rating scale ranged from 1 (no pain) to 5 (very severe pain), where 1: none; 2: mild; 3: moderate; 4: severe; 5: very severe. A higher score indicated a more severe pain.
Analysis population: mITT analysis Set included all participants who received a JNJ-68284528 infusion at the targeted RP2D dose level. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "n" (number analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified time points.
Groups in this outcome
Phase 2 (US Population)
Participants received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m\^2 IV infusion and fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2 IV infusion daily for 3 days from Day -5 to Day -3. On Day 1, participants received recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) dose of JNJ-68284528 0.75\*10\^6 CAR positive viable T cells/kg as IV infusion.
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
Participants received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m\^2 IV infusion and fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2 IV infusion daily for 3 days from Day -5 to Day -3. On Day 1, participants received RP2D dose of JNJ-68284528 0.75\*10\^6 CAR positive viable T cells/kg as IV infusion.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
54
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
8
Reported measurements
Change at Day 7
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
54
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.3
0.96
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.3
0.71
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 28
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
52
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.3
0.94
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
-0.1
0.64
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 56
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
52
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.3
0.79
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.3
0.46
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 78
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
46
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.3
0.87
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.0
0.53
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 100
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
49
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.3
0.93
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.0
0.53
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 128
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
40
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.3
1.06
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.0
0.53
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 156
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
36
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.4
0.90
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.0
0.93
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 184
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
39
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.3
1.06
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.3
0.46
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 212
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
33
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
6
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.2
0.97
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.0
0.63
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 240
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
31
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
3
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.3
0.86
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.0
0.00
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 268
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
34
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
1
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.5
0.93
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.0
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Here, 'NA' signifies that SD could not be calculated as only 1 participant was evaluated.
Change at Day 296
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
33
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
2
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.2
1.20
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.0
0.00
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 324
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
13
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
1
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.6
1.12
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0.0
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Here, 'NA' signifies that SD could not be calculated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
Change at Day 352
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
7
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.9
1.21
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 380
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
2
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
0
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.5
0.71
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.96
value
-0.3
group Id
OG001
spread
0.71
value
0.3
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
54
group Id
OG001
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 7
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.94
value
-0.3
group Id
OG001
spread
0.64
value
-0.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
52
group Id
OG001
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 28
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.79
value
-0.3
group Id
OG001
spread
0.46
value
0.3
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
52
group Id
OG001
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 56
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.87
value
-0.3
group Id
OG001
spread
0.53
value
0.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
46
group Id
OG001
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 78
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.93
value
-0.3
group Id
OG001
spread
0.53
value
0.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
49
group Id
OG001
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 100
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
1.06
value
-0.3
group Id
OG001
spread
0.53
value
0.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
40
group Id
OG001
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 128
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.90
value
-0.4
group Id
OG001
spread
0.93
value
0.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
36
group Id
OG001
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 156
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
1.06
value
-0.3
group Id
OG001
spread
0.46
value
0.3
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
39
group Id
OG001
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 184
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.97
value
-0.2
group Id
OG001
spread
0.63
value
0.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
33
group Id
OG001
value
6
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 212
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.86
value
-0.3
group Id
OG001
spread
0.00
value
0.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
31
group Id
OG001
value
3
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 240
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.93
value
-0.5
comment
Here, 'NA' signifies that SD could not be calculated as only 1 participant was evaluated.
group Id
OG001
spread
NA
value
0.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
34
group Id
OG001
value
1
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 268
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
1.20
value
-0.2
group Id
OG001
spread
0.00
value
0.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
33
group Id
OG001
value
2
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 296
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
54
group Id
OG001
value
8
units
Participants
description
PGIS was a single item to assess severity of pain on a 5-point verbal rating scale ranged from 1 (no pain) to 5 (very severe pain), where 1: none; 2: mild; 3: moderate; 4: severe; 5: very severe. A higher score indicated a more severe pain.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Participants received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m\^2 IV infusion and fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2 IV infusion daily for 3 days from Day -5 to Day -3. On Day 1, participants received recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) dose of JNJ-68284528 0.75\*10\^6 CAR positive viable T cells/kg as IV infusion.
id
OG000
title
Phase 2 (US Population)
description
Participants received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m\^2 IV infusion and fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2 IV infusion daily for 3 days from Day -5 to Day -3. On Day 1, participants received RP2D dose of JNJ-68284528 0.75\*10\^6 CAR positive viable T cells/kg as IV infusion.
id
OG001
title
Phase 2 (Japan Population)
param Type
MEAN
population Description
mITT analysis Set included all participants who received a JNJ-68284528 infusion at the targeted RP2D dose level. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "n" (number analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified time points.
Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Score at Days 7, 28, 56, 78, 100, 128, 156, 184, 212, 240, 268, 296, 324, 352, 380