Phase 2 (Japan Population): Change From Baseline in EuroQol Five Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score at Days 7, 28, 56, 78, 100, 128, 156, 184, 212, 240, 268, 296 and 324
A Study of JNJ-68284528, a Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy Directed Against B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma · Source last updated 2025-07-30
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEAN
Unit
Score on a scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Deviation
Time frame
Baseline, Days 7, 28, 56, 78, 100, 128, 156, 184, 212, 240, 268, 296 and 324
What was measured
EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire consisted of 2 components: a health state profile/a single utility index value and an optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile/a single utility index value had 5 dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels: 1 =no problems, 2 =slight problems, 3 =moderate problems, 4 =severe problems and 5 =extreme problems. The scores for the 5 dimensions were used to compute a single utility score ranging from 0 to 1 representing the general health status of the individual. Higher score indicated better health status. EQ-5D VAS was used to record participant's rating for his/her "health today" and ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.
Analysis population: mITT analysis Set included all participants who received a JNJ-68284528 infusion at the targeted RP2D dose level. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "n" (number analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified time points.
Groups in this outcome
Phase 2 (US Population)
Participants received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m\^2 IV infusion and fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2 IV infusion daily for 3 days from Day -5 to Day -3. On Day 1, participants received recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) dose of JNJ-68284528 0.75\*10\^6 CAR positive viable T cells/kg as IV infusion.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
8
Reported measurements
Change at Day 7
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.05
0.149
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 28
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.06
0.185
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 56
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.03
0.057
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 78
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
0.01
0.098
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 100
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.04
0.075
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 128
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
0.00
0.063
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 156
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.02
0.053
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 184
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
8
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
-0.01
0.079
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 212
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
6
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
0.04
0.109
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 240
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
3
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
0.05
0.079
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 268
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
2
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
0.07
0.096
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 296
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
2
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
0.04
0.061
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Change at Day 324
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Phase 2 (US Population)
1
Values in Score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Phase 2 (US Population)
0.14
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Here, 'NA' signifies that SD could not be calculated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.149
value
-0.05
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 7
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.185
value
-0.06
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 28
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.057
value
-0.03
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 56
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.098
value
0.01
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 78
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.075
value
-0.04
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 100
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.063
value
0.00
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 128
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.053
value
-0.02
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 156
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.079
value
-0.01
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
8
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 184
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.109
value
0.04
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
6
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 212
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.079
value
0.05
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
3
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 240
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.096
value
0.07
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
2
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 268
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.061
value
0.04
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
2
units
Participants
title
Change at Day 296
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
8
units
Participants
description
EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire consisted of 2 components: a health state profile/a single utility index value and an optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile/a single utility index value had 5 dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 5 response levels: 1 =no problems, 2 =slight problems, 3 =moderate problems, 4 =severe problems and 5 =extreme problems. The scores for the 5 dimensions were used to compute a single utility score ranging from 0 to 1 representing the general health status of the individual. Higher score indicated better health status. EQ-5D VAS was used to record participant's rating for his/her "health today" and ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Participants received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m\^2 IV infusion and fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2 IV infusion daily for 3 days from Day -5 to Day -3. On Day 1, participants received recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) dose of JNJ-68284528 0.75\*10\^6 CAR positive viable T cells/kg as IV infusion.
id
OG000
title
Phase 2 (US Population)
param Type
MEAN
population Description
mITT analysis Set included all participants who received a JNJ-68284528 infusion at the targeted RP2D dose level. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and "n" (number analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for specified time points.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline, Days 7, 28, 56, 78, 100, 128, 156, 184, 212, 240, 268, 296 and 324
title
Phase 2 (Japan Population): Change From Baseline in EuroQol Five Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score at Days 7, 28, 56, 78, 100, 128, 156, 184, 212, 240, 268, 296 and 324