NCT03391466 · OUTCOME
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Scores
Study of Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Compared to Standard of Care Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma · Source last updated 2025-12-01
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEAN
- Unit
- Score on scale
- Interval / dispersion
- Standard Deviation
- Time frame
- Baseline, Days 50, 100, and 150; Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
What was measured
Global health status was measured using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C-30. This health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire was comprised of 15 questions on functional scales, 13 questions on symptom scales and 2 on global health status scale. Global Health Status used a 7 point Likert-type scale of 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). All scores were transformed to 0-100. Higher scores for Global Health Status indicated better HRQoL.
Analysis population: Participants in Quality of Life (QoL) Analysis Set with data available at given timepoint were analyzed. The QoL Analysis Set was defined as the subset of participants in the Full Analysis Set who have a baseline and Day 150 post-randomization QoL assessment.
Groups in this outcome
Axicabtagene Ciloleucel
Participants received cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion and fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion conditioning chemotherapy for 3 days followed by axicabtagene ciloleucel administered as a single IV infusion at a target dose of 2 x 10\^6 anti-CD19 CAR transduced autologous T cells/kg on Day 0.
Standard of Care Therapy
Participants received 2 or 3, 21-day cycles of second-line chemotherapy regimen:
* R-ICE: rituximab 375mg/m\^2 before chemotherapy, ifosfamide 5g/m\^2 24 hours CI on Day 2 + mesna, carboplatin AUC 5 Day 2, maximum dose 800mg, etoposide 100mg/m\^2/day on Days 1-3;
* R-ESHAP: rituximab 375mg/m\^2 Day 1, etoposide 40mg/m\^2/day IV on Days 1-4, methylprednisolone 500mg/day IV on Days 1-4 or 5, cisplatin at 25mg/m\^2/day CI Days 1-4, cytarabine 2g/m\^2 on Day 5;
* R-GDP: rituximab 375mg/m\^2 Day 1 (or Day 8), gemcitabine 1g/m\^2 on Days 1 and 8, dexamethasone 40mg on Days 1-4, cisplatin 75mg/m\^2 Day 1 or carboplatin AUC=5; or
* R-DHAP: rituximab 375mg/m\^2 before chemotherapy, dexamethasone 40mg/day on Days 1-4, high dose cytarabine 2g/m\^2 every 12 hours for 2 doses on Day 2 following platinum, cisplatin 100mg/m\^2 24 hours CI on Day 1 or oxaliplatin 100mg/m\^2.
Participants who responded to second-line chemotherapy got high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 165 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 130 |
|---|
Reported measurements
Score at Baseline
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 165 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 130 |
|---|
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 68.6 | 19.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 70.1 | 23.1 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from Baseline at Study Day 50
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 163 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 124 |
|---|
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | -7.4 | 20.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | -8.5 | 22.7 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from Baseline at Study Day 100
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 146 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 62 |
|---|
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 1.3 | 19.6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | -15.3 | 22.7 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from Baseline at Study Day 150
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 110 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 56 |
|---|
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 5.9 | 24.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | -4.2 | 23.7 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from Baseline at Study Month 9
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 88 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 40 |
|---|
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 8.0 | 22.7 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 3.5 | 23.7 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from Baseline at Study Month 12
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 79 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 33 |
|---|
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 8.6 | 24.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 9.1 | 20.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from Baseline at Study Month 15
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 67 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 26 |
|---|
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 9.0 | 22.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 9.9 | 18.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from Baseline at Study Month 18
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 71 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 23 |
|---|
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 10.2 | 20.9 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 6.5 | 21.3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from Baseline at Study Month 21
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 45 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 20 |
|---|
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 10.0 | 21.5 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 15.0 | 19.6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Change from Baseline at Study Month 24
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 32 |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 12 |
|---|
Values in Score on scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Axicabtagene Ciloleucel | 8.6 | 21.0 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
| Standard of Care Therapy | 13.2 | 17.2 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
|---|
Source statistical analyses
Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.
- ci Lower Limit
- 12.3
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 23.9
- group Description
- Difference in mean change of scores from Baseline at Day 100.
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- <0.0001
- p Value Comment
- False Discovery Rate Methodology
- param Type
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- param Value
- 18.1
- statistical Method
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- ci Lower Limit
- 2.6
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 17.0
- group Description
- Difference in mean change of scores from Baseline at Day 150.
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.0124
- p Value Comment
- False Discovery Rate Methodology
- param Type
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- param Value
- 9.8
- statistical Method
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- ci Lower Limit
- -3.3
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 12.0
- group Description
- Difference in mean change of scores from Baseline at Month 9.
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.2655
- p Value Comment
- False Discovery Rate Methodology
- param Type
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- param Value
- 4.4
- statistical Method
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
Complete source fields
- analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 12.3
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 23.9
- group Description
- Difference in mean change of scores from Baseline at Day 100.
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- <0.0001
- p Value Comment
- False Discovery Rate Methodology
- param Type
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- param Value
- 18.1
- statistical Method
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- ci Lower Limit
- 2.6
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 17.0
- group Description
- Difference in mean change of scores from Baseline at Day 150.
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.0124
- p Value Comment
- False Discovery Rate Methodology
- param Type
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- param Value
- 9.8
- statistical Method
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- ci Lower Limit
- -3.3
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 12.0
- group Description
- Difference in mean change of scores from Baseline at Month 9.
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.2655
- p Value Comment
- False Discovery Rate Methodology
- param Type
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- param Value
- 4.4
- statistical Method
- Mixed Model with Repeated Measures
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 19.9
- value
- 68.6
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 23.1
- value
- 70.1
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 165
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 130
- units
- Participants
- title
- Score at Baseline
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 20.2
- value
- -7.4
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 22.7
- value
- -8.5
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 163
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 124
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from Baseline at Study Day 50
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 19.6
- value
- 1.3
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 22.7
- value
- -15.3
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 146
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 62
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from Baseline at Study Day 100
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 24.9
- value
- 5.9
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 23.7
- value
- -4.2
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 110
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 56
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from Baseline at Study Day 150
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 22.7
- value
- 8.0
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 23.7
- value
- 3.5
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 88
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 40
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from Baseline at Study Month 9
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 24.9
- value
- 8.6
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 20.2
- value
- 9.1
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 79
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 33
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from Baseline at Study Month 12
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 22.3
- value
- 9.0
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 18.9
- value
- 9.9
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 67
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 26
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from Baseline at Study Month 15
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 20.9
- value
- 10.2
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 21.3
- value
- 6.5
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 71
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 23
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from Baseline at Study Month 18
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 21.5
- value
- 10.0
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 19.6
- value
- 15.0
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 45
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 20
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from Baseline at Study Month 21
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- spread
- 21.0
- value
- 8.6
- group Id
- OG001
- spread
- 17.2
- value
- 13.2
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 32
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 12
- units
- Participants
- title
- Change from Baseline at Study Month 24
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 165
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 130
- units
- Participants
- description
- Global health status was measured using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C-30. This health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire was comprised of 15 questions on functional scales, 13 questions on symptom scales and 2 on global health status scale. Global Health Status used a 7 point Likert-type scale of 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). All scores were transformed to 0-100. Higher scores for Global Health Status indicated better HRQoL.
- dispersion Type
- Standard Deviation
- groups
- description
- Participants received cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion and fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2/day IV infusion conditioning chemotherapy for 3 days followed by axicabtagene ciloleucel administered as a single IV infusion at a target dose of 2 x 10\^6 anti-CD19 CAR transduced autologous T cells/kg on Day 0.
- id
- OG000
- title
- Axicabtagene Ciloleucel
- description
- Participants received 2 or 3, 21-day cycles of second-line chemotherapy regimen:
* R-ICE: rituximab 375mg/m\^2 before chemotherapy, ifosfamide 5g/m\^2 24 hours CI on Day 2 + mesna, carboplatin AUC 5 Day 2, maximum dose 800mg, etoposide 100mg/m\^2/day on Days 1-3;
* R-ESHAP: rituximab 375mg/m\^2 Day 1, etoposide 40mg/m\^2/day IV on Days 1-4, methylprednisolone 500mg/day IV on Days 1-4 or 5, cisplatin at 25mg/m\^2/day CI Days 1-4, cytarabine 2g/m\^2 on Day 5;
* R-GDP: rituximab 375mg/m\^2 Day 1 (or Day 8), gemcitabine 1g/m\^2 on Days 1 and 8, dexamethasone 40mg on Days 1-4, cisplatin 75mg/m\^2 Day 1 or carboplatin AUC=5; or
* R-DHAP: rituximab 375mg/m\^2 before chemotherapy, dexamethasone 40mg/day on Days 1-4, high dose cytarabine 2g/m\^2 every 12 hours for 2 doses on Day 2 following platinum, cisplatin 100mg/m\^2 24 hours CI on Day 1 or oxaliplatin 100mg/m\^2.
Participants who responded to second-line chemotherapy got high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant.
- id
- OG001
- title
- Standard of Care Therapy
- param Type
- MEAN
- population Description
- Participants in Quality of Life (QoL) Analysis Set with data available at given timepoint were analyzed. The QoL Analysis Set was defined as the subset of participants in the Full Analysis Set who have a baseline and Day 150 post-randomization QoL assessment.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Baseline, Days 50, 100, and 150; Months 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
- title
- Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Scores
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Score on scale
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice