Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT03268954 · OUTCOME

Time to Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Transformation in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR MDS), Higher-Risk Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemias (HR CMML) and HR MDS/CMML Participants

Pevonedistat Plus Azacitidine Versus Single-Agent Azacitidine as First-Line Treatment for Participants With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), or Low-Blast Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) · Source last updated 2025-10-29

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From randomization until transformation to AML (up to approximately 42 months)

What was measured

Time to AML transformation in HR MDS and CMML participants was defined as time from randomization to documented AML transformation as determined by the independent review committee (IRC) assessment. Participants who died before progression to AML were censored. Transformation to AML was defined, according to WHO classification, as a participant having 20% blasts in the blood or marrow and increase of blast count by 50%.

Analysis population: ITT Population included all participants who were randomized. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis for the given category.

Groups in this outcome

Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2

Participants were administered azacitidine 75 mg/m\^2 IV or SC injection on Days 1 to 5, Days 8 and 9, in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or up to a maximum of 63 cycles.

Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2

Participants were administered azacitidine 75 mg/m\^2 IV or SC injection on Days 1 to 5, Days 8 and 9 and pevonedistat 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion, on Days 1, 3, and 5 in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or up to a maximum of 63 cycles.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2174
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2177

Reported measurements

HR MDS Participants

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2163
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2161
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^235.6Not reported26.51NAThe upper limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) was not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NANot reported23.29NAThe median, and upper limit of 95% CI were not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
HR CMML Participants

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^211
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^216
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NANot reportedNANAThe median, lower limit, and upper limit of 95% CI were not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NANot reportedNANAThe median, lower limit, and upper limit of 95% CI were not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
HR MDS/CMML Participants

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2174
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2177
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^235.6Not reported29.04NAThe upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NANot reported24.28NAThe median, and upper limit of 95% CI were not estimable due to low number of participants with event.

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.660
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.630
    estimate Comment
    HR:unadjusted stratified Cox proportional HazardRegression with stratification(IPSS-R risk groups=very high,high,or intermediate for HRMDS/CMML),treatment as factor.HR\<1:better prevention of AML transformation in combination arm than azacitidine arm.
    group Description
    Time to AML Transformation in HR MDS Participants
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.562
    p Value Comment
    P-value comparing time to AML Transformation between treatment groups was based on 1-sided stratified log-rank test stratified by IPSS-R risk groups of very high, high, or intermediate for HR MDS.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.037
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.068
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    33.773
    estimate Comment
    HR:unadjusted stratified Cox proportional HazardRegression with stratification(IPSS-R risk groups=very high,high,or intermediate for HRMDS/CMML),treatment as factor.HR\<1:better prevention of AML transformation in combination arm than azacitidine arm.
    group Description
    Time to AML Transformation in HR CMML Participants
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.603
    p Value Comment
    P-value comparing time to AML Transformation between treatment groups was based on 1-sided stratified log-rank test stratified by IPSS-R risk groups of very high, high, or intermediate for HR CMML.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.512
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  3. ci Lower Limit
    0.663
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.610
    estimate Comment
    HR:unadjusted stratified Cox proportional HazardRegression with stratification(IPSS-R risk groups=very high,high,or intermediate for HRMDS/CMML),treatment as factor.HR\<1:better prevention of AML transformation in combination arm than azacitidine arm.
    group Description
    Time to AML Transformation in HR MDS/CMML Participants
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.558
    p Value Comment
    P-value comparing time to AML Transformation between treatment groups was based on 1-sided stratified log-rank test stratified by IPSS-R risk groups of very high, high, or intermediate for HR CMML/MDS.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.034
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.660
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.630
    estimate Comment
    HR:unadjusted stratified Cox proportional HazardRegression with stratification(IPSS-R risk groups=very high,high,or intermediate for HRMDS/CMML),treatment as factor.HR\<1:better prevention of AML transformation in combination arm than azacitidine arm.
    group Description
    Time to AML Transformation in HR MDS Participants
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.562
    p Value Comment
    P-value comparing time to AML Transformation between treatment groups was based on 1-sided stratified log-rank test stratified by IPSS-R risk groups of very high, high, or intermediate for HR MDS.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.037
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.068
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    33.773
    estimate Comment
    HR:unadjusted stratified Cox proportional HazardRegression with stratification(IPSS-R risk groups=very high,high,or intermediate for HRMDS/CMML),treatment as factor.HR\<1:better prevention of AML transformation in combination arm than azacitidine arm.
    group Description
    Time to AML Transformation in HR CMML Participants
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.603
    p Value Comment
    P-value comparing time to AML Transformation between treatment groups was based on 1-sided stratified log-rank test stratified by IPSS-R risk groups of very high, high, or intermediate for HR CMML.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.512
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  3. ci Lower Limit
    0.663
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.610
    estimate Comment
    HR:unadjusted stratified Cox proportional HazardRegression with stratification(IPSS-R risk groups=very high,high,or intermediate for HRMDS/CMML),treatment as factor.HR\<1:better prevention of AML transformation in combination arm than azacitidine arm.
    group Description
    Time to AML Transformation in HR MDS/CMML Participants
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    =0.558
    p Value Comment
    P-value comparing time to AML Transformation between treatment groups was based on 1-sided stratified log-rank test stratified by IPSS-R risk groups of very high, high, or intermediate for HR CMML/MDS.
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.034
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. comment
        The upper limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) was not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
        group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        26.51
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        35.6
      2. comment
        The median, and upper limit of 95% CI were not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
        group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        23.29
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        163
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        161
      units
      Participants
    title
    HR MDS Participants
  2. categories
    1. measurements
      1. comment
        The median, lower limit, and upper limit of 95% CI were not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
        group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        NA
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
      2. comment
        The median, lower limit, and upper limit of 95% CI were not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
        group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        NA
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        11
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        16
      units
      Participants
    title
    HR CMML Participants
  3. categories
    1. measurements
      1. comment
        The upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
        group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        29.04
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        35.6
      2. comment
        The median, and upper limit of 95% CI were not estimable due to low number of participants with event.
        group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        24.28
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        174
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        177
      units
      Participants
    title
    HR MDS/CMML Participants
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      174
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      177
    units
    Participants
description
Time to AML transformation in HR MDS and CMML participants was defined as time from randomization to documented AML transformation as determined by the independent review committee (IRC) assessment. Participants who died before progression to AML were censored. Transformation to AML was defined, according to WHO classification, as a participant having 20% blasts in the blood or marrow and increase of blast count by 50%.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants were administered azacitidine 75 mg/m\^2 IV or SC injection on Days 1 to 5, Days 8 and 9, in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or up to a maximum of 63 cycles.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2
  2. description
    Participants were administered azacitidine 75 mg/m\^2 IV or SC injection on Days 1 to 5, Days 8 and 9 and pevonedistat 20 mg/m\^2 IV infusion, on Days 1, 3, and 5 in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or up to a maximum of 63 cycles.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
ITT Population included all participants who were randomized. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis for the given category.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From randomization until transformation to AML (up to approximately 42 months)
title
Time to Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Transformation in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR MDS), Higher-Risk Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemias (HR CMML) and HR MDS/CMML Participants
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-25a395029948b04d52b1253f

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice