NCT03164616 · OUTCOME
Overall Survival (OS); D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEDIAN
- Unit
- months
- Interval / dispersion
- 95% Confidence Interval
- Time frame
- From baseline until death due to any cause. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021 (maximum of approximately 45 months).
What was measured
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. The final analysis of OS in the global cohort was pre-specified after approximately 532 OS events occurred across the D + SoC and SoC alone treatment arms (80% maturity).
Analysis population: Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients. Analysis of OS was assessed as a primary outcome measure for comparison of the D + SoC vs SoC alone treatment arms only. The alternative treatment arm comparisons were assessed as a secondary outcome measure.
Groups in this outcome
D + SoC
During chemotherapy (combination) stage: Patients received durvalumab 1500 mg monotherapy + SoC chemotherapy via IV infusion Q3W for 4 doses/cycles (Weeks 0, 3, 6 and 9). The SoC chemotherapy was the Investigator's choice of one of the following regimens: abraxane + carboplatin (squamous and non-squamous patients), pemetrexed + cisplatin or carboplatin (non-squamous patients only), or gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin (squamous patients only). Post-chemotherapy (maintenance) stage: Patients then continued to receive durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg IV infusion Q4W from Week 12 until PD, unless there was unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another discontinuation criterion was met. Non-squamous patients who received pemetrexed + carboplatin/cisplatin during chemotherapy stage could receive pemetrexed maintenance therapy, given Q4W from Week 12 until PD, unless contraindicated per the Investigator.
SoC Alone
During chemotherapy (combination) stage: Patients received SoC chemotherapy alone via IV infusion Q3W for 4 doses/cycles (Weeks 0, 3, 6 and 9). Patients could also receive SoC chemotherapy for an additional 2 cycles Q3W on Weeks 12 and 15 if clinically indicated and at the Investigator's discretion before the patient entered follow-up. The SoC chemotherapy was the Investigator's choice of one of the following regimens: abraxane + carboplatin (squamous and non-squamous patients), pemetrexed + cisplatin or carboplatin (non-squamous patients only), or gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin (squamous patients only). Post-chemotherapy (maintenance) stage: Non-squamous patients who received pemetrexed + carboplatin/cisplatin during chemotherapy stage could receive pemetrexed maintenance therapy, given Q3W or Q4W (dependent on Investigator decision and local standards) from Week 12 until PD, unless contraindicated per the Investigator.
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| D + SoC | 338 |
| SoC Alone | 337 |
Reported measurements
Source class 1
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D + SoC | 13.3 | Not reported | 11.4 | 14.7 | Not reported |
| SoC Alone | 11.7 | Not reported | 10.5 | 13.1 | Not reported |
Source statistical analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.724
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 1.016
- estimate Comment
- The HR and CI were estimated from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for PD-L1 (TC ≥50% vs \<50%), histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and disease stage (IVA vs IVB) and using Efron method to control for ties.
- group Description
- D + SoC vs SoC alone. An HR \<1 favors D + SoC to be associated with a longer OS than SoC alone.
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.07581
- p Value Comment
- Analysis was performed using a stratified log-rank test adjusting for PD-L1 tumor expression (TC ≥50% vs \<50%), histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and disease stage (IVA vs IVB) and using the Breslow approach for handling ties.
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.86
- statistical Method
- Log Rank
Complete source fields
- analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.724
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 1.016
- estimate Comment
- The HR and CI were estimated from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for PD-L1 (TC ≥50% vs \<50%), histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and disease stage (IVA vs IVB) and using Efron method to control for ties.
- group Description
- D + SoC vs SoC alone. An HR \<1 favors D + SoC to be associated with a longer OS than SoC alone.
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.07581
- p Value Comment
- Analysis was performed using a stratified log-rank test adjusting for PD-L1 tumor expression (TC ≥50% vs \<50%), histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and disease stage (IVA vs IVB) and using the Breslow approach for handling ties.
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.86
- statistical Method
- Log Rank
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 11.4
- upper Limit
- 14.7
- value
- 13.3
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 10.5
- upper Limit
- 13.1
- value
- 11.7
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 338
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 337
- units
- Participants
- description
- OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Median OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. The final analysis of OS in the global cohort was pre-specified after approximately 532 OS events occurred across the D + SoC and SoC alone treatment arms (80% maturity).
- dispersion Type
- 95% Confidence Interval
- groups
- description
- During chemotherapy (combination) stage: Patients received durvalumab 1500 mg monotherapy + SoC chemotherapy via IV infusion Q3W for 4 doses/cycles (Weeks 0, 3, 6 and 9). The SoC chemotherapy was the Investigator's choice of one of the following regimens: abraxane + carboplatin (squamous and non-squamous patients), pemetrexed + cisplatin or carboplatin (non-squamous patients only), or gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin (squamous patients only). Post-chemotherapy (maintenance) stage: Patients then continued to receive durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg IV infusion Q4W from Week 12 until PD, unless there was unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another discontinuation criterion was met. Non-squamous patients who received pemetrexed + carboplatin/cisplatin during chemotherapy stage could receive pemetrexed maintenance therapy, given Q4W from Week 12 until PD, unless contraindicated per the Investigator.
- id
- OG000
- title
- D + SoC
- description
- During chemotherapy (combination) stage: Patients received SoC chemotherapy alone via IV infusion Q3W for 4 doses/cycles (Weeks 0, 3, 6 and 9). Patients could also receive SoC chemotherapy for an additional 2 cycles Q3W on Weeks 12 and 15 if clinically indicated and at the Investigator's discretion before the patient entered follow-up. The SoC chemotherapy was the Investigator's choice of one of the following regimens: abraxane + carboplatin (squamous and non-squamous patients), pemetrexed + cisplatin or carboplatin (non-squamous patients only), or gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin (squamous patients only). Post-chemotherapy (maintenance) stage: Non-squamous patients who received pemetrexed + carboplatin/cisplatin during chemotherapy stage could receive pemetrexed maintenance therapy, given Q3W or Q4W (dependent on Investigator decision and local standards) from Week 12 until PD, unless contraindicated per the Investigator.
- id
- OG001
- title
- SoC Alone
- param Type
- MEDIAN
- population Description
- Global cohort: The FAS included all randomized patients. Analysis of OS was assessed as a primary outcome measure for comparison of the D + SoC vs SoC alone treatment arms only. The alternative treatment arm comparisons were assessed as a secondary outcome measure.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- From baseline until death due to any cause. Assessed until global cohort DCO of 12 March 2021 (maximum of approximately 45 months).
- title
- Overall Survival (OS); D + SoC Compared With SoC Alone
- type
- PRIMARY
- unit Of Measure
- months
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle