A Study of Ruxolitinib vs Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Patients With Steroid-refractory Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease (GvHD) After Bone Marrow Transplantation (REACH3) · Source last updated 2025-08-12
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEAN
Unit
scores on a scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Deviation
Time frame
Baseline; up to Cycle 39 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)
What was measured
The EQ-5D-5L is a descriptive classification consisting of five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, anxiety/depression, and pain/discomfort. The five-level version (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) uses a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being no problems and 5 being extreme problems.
Analysis population: FAS. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
Groups in this outcome
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice per day at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg).
Best Available Therapy
Participants received best available therapies (BATs), including, but not limited to, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), low-dose methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus or sirolimus), infliximab, rituximab, pentostatin, imatinib, and ibrutinib based on the investigator's decision.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
165
Best Available Therapy
164
Reported measurements
Cycle 2 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
118
Best Available Therapy
98
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.03
0.214
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-0.01
0.163
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 3 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
113
Best Available Therapy
103
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.03
0.221
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-0.04
0.259
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 4 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
108
Best Available Therapy
97
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.04
0.196
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-0.01
0.192
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 5 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
105
Best Available Therapy
88
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.02
0.210
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-0.03
0.243
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
96
Best Available Therapy
81
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.05
0.230
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.01
0.186
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 7 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
89
Best Available Therapy
86
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.07
0.234
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-0.00
0.225
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 9 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
86
Best Available Therapy
42
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.07
0.228
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-0.02
0.166
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
68
Best Available Therapy
34
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.07
0.187
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.02
0.158
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 15 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
60
Best Available Therapy
30
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.07
0.250
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.03
0.140
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 18 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
56
Best Available Therapy
25
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.07
0.299
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.02
0.110
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 21 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
57
Best Available Therapy
24
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.08
0.268
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-0.00
0.222
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 24 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
51
Best Available Therapy
22
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.07
0.272
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.01
0.164
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 27 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
49
Best Available Therapy
21
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.06
0.299
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.03
0.182
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 30 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
48
Best Available Therapy
19
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.05
0.261
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.01
0.159
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 33 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
50
Best Available Therapy
19
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.00
0.282
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.05
0.186
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 36 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
47
Best Available Therapy
18
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.06
0.231
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.04
0.216
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 39 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
50
Best Available Therapy
18
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.06
0.255
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.01
0.214
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.214
value
0.03
group Id
OG001
spread
0.163
value
-0.01
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
118
group Id
OG001
value
98
units
Participants
title
Cycle 2 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.221
value
0.03
group Id
OG001
spread
0.259
value
-0.04
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
113
group Id
OG001
value
103
units
Participants
title
Cycle 3 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.196
value
0.04
group Id
OG001
spread
0.192
value
-0.01
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
108
group Id
OG001
value
97
units
Participants
title
Cycle 4 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.210
value
0.02
group Id
OG001
spread
0.243
value
-0.03
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
105
group Id
OG001
value
88
units
Participants
title
Cycle 5 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.230
value
0.05
group Id
OG001
spread
0.186
value
0.01
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
96
group Id
OG001
value
81
units
Participants
title
Cycle 6 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.234
value
0.07
group Id
OG001
spread
0.225
value
-0.00
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
89
group Id
OG001
value
86
units
Participants
title
Cycle 7 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.228
value
0.07
group Id
OG001
spread
0.166
value
-0.02
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
86
group Id
OG001
value
42
units
Participants
title
Cycle 9 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.187
value
0.07
group Id
OG001
spread
0.158
value
0.02
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
68
group Id
OG001
value
34
units
Participants
title
Cycle 12 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.250
value
0.07
group Id
OG001
spread
0.140
value
0.03
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
60
group Id
OG001
value
30
units
Participants
title
Cycle 15 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.299
value
0.07
group Id
OG001
spread
0.110
value
0.02
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
56
group Id
OG001
value
25
units
Participants
title
Cycle 18 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.268
value
0.08
group Id
OG001
spread
0.222
value
-0.00
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
57
group Id
OG001
value
24
units
Participants
title
Cycle 21 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.272
value
0.07
group Id
OG001
spread
0.164
value
0.01
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
51
group Id
OG001
value
22
units
Participants
title
Cycle 24 Day 1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
165
group Id
OG001
value
164
units
Participants
description
The EQ-5D-5L is a descriptive classification consisting of five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, anxiety/depression, and pain/discomfort. The five-level version (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) uses a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being no problems and 5 being extreme problems.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice per day at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg).
id
OG000
title
Ruxolitinib
description
Participants received best available therapies (BATs), including, but not limited to, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), low-dose methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus or sirolimus), infliximab, rituximab, pentostatin, imatinib, and ibrutinib based on the investigator's decision.
id
OG001
title
Best Available Therapy
param Type
MEAN
population Description
FAS. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline; up to Cycle 39 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)