Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplantation (FACT-BMT)
A Study of Ruxolitinib vs Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Patients With Steroid-refractory Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease (GvHD) After Bone Marrow Transplantation (REACH3) · Source last updated 2025-08-12
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEAN
Unit
scores on a scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Deviation
Time frame
Baseline; up to Cycle 39 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)
What was measured
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The FACT-BMT is a 50-item self-report questionnaire that measures the effect of a therapy on domains including physical, functional, social/family, and emotional well-being, together with additional concerns relevant for bone marrow transplantation participants. The questions were based on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0 corresponds to "not at all" and 4 corresponds to "very much." The higher the final score, the better the quality of life. The FACT-BMT total score ranges from 0 to 148.
Analysis population: FAS. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
Groups in this outcome
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice per day at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg).
Best Available Therapy
Participants received best available therapies (BATs), including, but not limited to, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), low-dose methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus or sirolimus), infliximab, rituximab, pentostatin, imatinib, and ibrutinib based on the investigator's decision.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
165
Best Available Therapy
164
Reported measurements
Cycle 2 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
122
Best Available Therapy
102
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
2.32
12.191
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-0.22
14.949
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 3 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
115
Best Available Therapy
106
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
0.62
14.452
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-1.82
15.849
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 4 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
110
Best Available Therapy
100
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
1.98
15.888
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-1.05
16.147
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 5 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
107
Best Available Therapy
91
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
1.25
14.577
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
-0.23
18.903
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
96
Best Available Therapy
85
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
2.91
14.562
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
2.41
14.766
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 7 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
90
Best Available Therapy
88
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
4.14
14.669
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
0.85
16.811
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 9 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
88
Best Available Therapy
46
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
5.32
16.815
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
1.20
17.635
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
68
Best Available Therapy
35
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
7.26
19.296
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
3.74
18.059
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 15 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
59
Best Available Therapy
31
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
5.07
18.220
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
7.58
17.063
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 18 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
55
Best Available Therapy
27
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
4.10
19.440
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
8.19
17.993
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 21 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
56
Best Available Therapy
24
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
5.24
19.485
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
3.68
17.378
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 24 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
50
Best Available Therapy
23
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
5.90
19.662
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
7.84
18.561
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 27 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
50
Best Available Therapy
21
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
6.23
18.880
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
5.10
18.885
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 30 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
48
Best Available Therapy
19
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
7.53
20.314
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
5.75
21.037
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 33 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
49
Best Available Therapy
19
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
5.17
20.330
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
5.67
22.573
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 36 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
47
Best Available Therapy
18
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
8.72
18.710
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
4.77
24.186
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 39 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Ruxolitinib
50
Best Available Therapy
18
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Ruxolitinib
8.65
21.669
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Best Available Therapy
6.64
22.384
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
12.191
value
2.32
group Id
OG001
spread
14.949
value
-0.22
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
122
group Id
OG001
value
102
units
Participants
title
Cycle 2 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.452
value
0.62
group Id
OG001
spread
15.849
value
-1.82
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
115
group Id
OG001
value
106
units
Participants
title
Cycle 3 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
15.888
value
1.98
group Id
OG001
spread
16.147
value
-1.05
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
110
group Id
OG001
value
100
units
Participants
title
Cycle 4 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.577
value
1.25
group Id
OG001
spread
18.903
value
-0.23
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
107
group Id
OG001
value
91
units
Participants
title
Cycle 5 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.562
value
2.91
group Id
OG001
spread
14.766
value
2.41
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
96
group Id
OG001
value
85
units
Participants
title
Cycle 6 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.669
value
4.14
group Id
OG001
spread
16.811
value
0.85
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
90
group Id
OG001
value
88
units
Participants
title
Cycle 7 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.815
value
5.32
group Id
OG001
spread
17.635
value
1.20
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
88
group Id
OG001
value
46
units
Participants
title
Cycle 9 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
19.296
value
7.26
group Id
OG001
spread
18.059
value
3.74
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
68
group Id
OG001
value
35
units
Participants
title
Cycle 12 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.220
value
5.07
group Id
OG001
spread
17.063
value
7.58
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
59
group Id
OG001
value
31
units
Participants
title
Cycle 15 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
19.440
value
4.10
group Id
OG001
spread
17.993
value
8.19
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
55
group Id
OG001
value
27
units
Participants
title
Cycle 18 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
19.485
value
5.24
group Id
OG001
spread
17.378
value
3.68
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
56
group Id
OG001
value
24
units
Participants
title
Cycle 21 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
19.662
value
5.90
group Id
OG001
spread
18.561
value
7.84
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
50
group Id
OG001
value
23
units
Participants
title
Cycle 24 Day 1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
165
group Id
OG001
value
164
units
Participants
description
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The FACT-BMT is a 50-item self-report questionnaire that measures the effect of a therapy on domains including physical, functional, social/family, and emotional well-being, together with additional concerns relevant for bone marrow transplantation participants. The questions were based on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0 corresponds to "not at all" and 4 corresponds to "very much." The higher the final score, the better the quality of life. The FACT-BMT total score ranges from 0 to 148.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice per day at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg).
id
OG000
title
Ruxolitinib
description
Participants received best available therapies (BATs), including, but not limited to, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), low-dose methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus or sirolimus), infliximab, rituximab, pentostatin, imatinib, and ibrutinib based on the investigator's decision.
id
OG001
title
Best Available Therapy
param Type
MEAN
population Description
FAS. Only participants with available data were analyzed.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline; up to Cycle 39 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)
title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplantation (FACT-BMT)