Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT03112603 · OUTCOME

Duration of Response Through Study Completion

A Study of Ruxolitinib vs Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Patients With Steroid-refractory Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease (GvHD) After Bone Marrow Transplantation (REACH3) · Source last updated 2025-08-12

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
Months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
from first response to LPLV (approximately 5 years)

What was measured

DOR was defined as the time from first response until cGvHD progression, death, or the date of change/addition of systemic therapies for cGvHD and as assessed for responders only. Response was based on cGvHD disease assessments (National Institutes of Health consensus criteria). Duration of response was evaluated in participants who achieved a CR or PR at or before Cycle 7 Day 1. The analysis included a larger number of participants than the number of participants who achieved CR or PR at Cycle 7 Day 1 (82 ruxolitinib and 42 BAT) because the analysis took into account not only those participants who achieved CR or PR at Cycle 7 Day 1, but also participants who achieved CR or PR before Cycle 7 Day 1 but who may have lost their response at Cycle 7 Day 1. For this reason, the number of participants in this analysis does not align with the best overall response (BOR) at Cycle 7 Day 1. This analysis was based on the cutoff date upon study completion (December 2022).

Analysis population: FAS. Duration of response was evaluated in participants who achieved a CR or PR at or before Cycle 7 Day 1.

Groups in this outcome

Ruxolitinib

Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice per day at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg).

Best Available Therapy

Participants received best available therapies (BATs), including, but not limited to, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), low-dose methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus or sirolimus), infliximab, rituximab, pentostatin, imatinib, and ibrutinib based on the investigator's decision.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Ruxolitinib126
Best Available Therapy103

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
RuxolitinibNANot reportedNANAMedian duration of response was not reached due to an insufficient number of participants with events.
Best Available Therapy6.4Not reported4.911.4Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. comment
        Median duration of response was not reached due to an insufficient number of participants with events.
        group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        NA
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        4.9
        upper Limit
        11.4
        value
        6.4
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      126
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      103
    units
    Participants
description
DOR was defined as the time from first response until cGvHD progression, death, or the date of change/addition of systemic therapies for cGvHD and as assessed for responders only. Response was based on cGvHD disease assessments (National Institutes of Health consensus criteria). Duration of response was evaluated in participants who achieved a CR or PR at or before Cycle 7 Day 1. The analysis included a larger number of participants than the number of participants who achieved CR or PR at Cycle 7 Day 1 (82 ruxolitinib and 42 BAT) because the analysis took into account not only those participants who achieved CR or PR at Cycle 7 Day 1, but also participants who achieved CR or PR before Cycle 7 Day 1 but who may have lost their response at Cycle 7 Day 1. For this reason, the number of participants in this analysis does not align with the best overall response (BOR) at Cycle 7 Day 1. This analysis was based on the cutoff date upon study completion (December 2022).
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice per day at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg).
    id
    OG000
    title
    Ruxolitinib
  2. description
    Participants received best available therapies (BATs), including, but not limited to, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), low-dose methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus or sirolimus), infliximab, rituximab, pentostatin, imatinib, and ibrutinib based on the investigator's decision.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Best Available Therapy
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
FAS. Duration of response was evaluated in participants who achieved a CR or PR at or before Cycle 7 Day 1.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
from first response to LPLV (approximately 5 years)
title
Duration of Response Through Study Completion
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
Months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice