Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT03112603 · OUTCOME

ORR at the End of Cycle 3

A Study of Ruxolitinib vs Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Patients With Steroid-refractory Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease (GvHD) After Bone Marrow Transplantation (REACH3) · Source last updated 2025-08-12

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)

What was measured

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in each arm demonstrating a CR or PR based on cGvHD disease assessments (National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria) without the requirement of additional systemic therapies for an earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response. Scoring of response was relative to the organ score at the time of randomization. CR: complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGVHD in all evaluable organs without the initiation or addition of new systemic therapy. PR: improvement in at least one organ (e.g., improvement of 1 or more points on a 4- to 7-point scale, or an improvement of 2 or more points on a 10- to 12-point scale) without progression in other organs or sites, initiation, or addition of new systemic therapies.

Analysis population: FAS

Groups in this outcome

Ruxolitinib

Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice per day at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg).

Best Available Therapy

Participants received best available therapies (BATs), including, but not limited to, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), low-dose methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus or sirolimus), infliximab, rituximab, pentostatin, imatinib, and ibrutinib based on the investigator's decision.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Ruxolitinib165
Best Available Therapy164

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Ruxolitinib54.5Not reported46.662.3Not reported
Best Available Therapy31.1Not reported24.138.8Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    1.75
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.39
    estimate Comment
    The odds ratio and 95% CI were calculated using a stratified CMH test.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    p Value
    <0.0001
    p Value Comment
    The one-sided p-value was calculated using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test.
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    2.77
    statistical Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    1.75
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    4.39
    estimate Comment
    The odds ratio and 95% CI were calculated using a stratified CMH test.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    p Value
    <0.0001
    p Value Comment
    The one-sided p-value was calculated using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test.
    param Type
    Odds Ratio (OR)
    param Value
    2.77
    statistical Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        46.6
        upper Limit
        62.3
        value
        54.5
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        24.1
        upper Limit
        38.8
        value
        31.1
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      165
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      164
    units
    Participants
description
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in each arm demonstrating a CR or PR based on cGvHD disease assessments (National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria) without the requirement of additional systemic therapies for an earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response. Scoring of response was relative to the organ score at the time of randomization. CR: complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGVHD in all evaluable organs without the initiation or addition of new systemic therapy. PR: improvement in at least one organ (e.g., improvement of 1 or more points on a 4- to 7-point scale, or an improvement of 2 or more points on a 10- to 12-point scale) without progression in other organs or sites, initiation, or addition of new systemic therapies.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Ruxolitinib was administered orally twice per day at a dose of 10 milligrams (mg).
    id
    OG000
    title
    Ruxolitinib
  2. description
    Participants received best available therapies (BATs), including, but not limited to, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), low-dose methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mTOR inhibitors (everolimus or sirolimus), infliximab, rituximab, pentostatin, imatinib, and ibrutinib based on the investigator's decision.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Best Available Therapy
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
FAS
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)
title
ORR at the End of Cycle 3
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
percentage of participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice