Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT03069352 · OUTCOME

Overall Survival After an Additional 6-Months Follow-up

A Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Low Dose Cytarabine Versus Low Dose Cytarabine Alone in Treatment Naive Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy · Source last updated 2025-09-30

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
From randomization until the 6-month follow-up analysis cut-off date of August 15, 2019; the median follow-up time was 17.7 months (range: 0.2-20.8) in the placebo arm and 17.5 months (range: 0.1-23.5) in the venetoclax arm.

What was measured

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants who had not died were censored at the date they were last known to be alive on or before the cutoff date. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Analysis population: Full analysis set

Groups in this outcome

Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)

Participants received matching placebo to venetoclax orally once a day (QD) plus cytarabine 20 mg/m² subcutaneously on Days 1 to 10 of each 28-day cycle.

Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)

Participants received venetoclax 600 mg orally once a day plus cytarabine 20 mg/m² subcutaneously on Days 1 to 10 of each 28-day cycle.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)68
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)143

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)4.1Not reported3.18.1Not reported
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)8.4Not reported5.910.1Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.503
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.985
    estimate Comment
    The hazard ratio was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model, stratified by AML status (de novo, secondary) and age (18 - \< 75, ≥ 75).
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    p Value
    0.040
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.704
    statistical Comment
    Log-rank test stratified by AML status (de novo, secondary) and age (18 - \< 75, ≥ 75).
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.514
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.000
    estimate Comment
    The hazard ratio was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    p Value
    0.049
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.717
    statistical Comment
    Unstratified analysis
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.503
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.985
    estimate Comment
    The hazard ratio was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model, stratified by AML status (de novo, secondary) and age (18 - \< 75, ≥ 75).
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    p Value
    0.040
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.704
    statistical Comment
    Log-rank test stratified by AML status (de novo, secondary) and age (18 - \< 75, ≥ 75).
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.514
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.000
    estimate Comment
    The hazard ratio was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    p Value
    0.049
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.717
    statistical Comment
    Unstratified analysis
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        3.1
        upper Limit
        8.1
        value
        4.1
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        5.9
        upper Limit
        10.1
        value
        8.4
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      68
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      143
    units
    Participants
description
Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants who had not died were censored at the date they were last known to be alive on or before the cutoff date. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received matching placebo to venetoclax orally once a day (QD) plus cytarabine 20 mg/m² subcutaneously on Days 1 to 10 of each 28-day cycle.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)
  2. description
    Participants received venetoclax 600 mg orally once a day plus cytarabine 20 mg/m² subcutaneously on Days 1 to 10 of each 28-day cycle.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
Full analysis set
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From randomization until the 6-month follow-up analysis cut-off date of August 15, 2019; the median follow-up time was 17.7 months (range: 0.2-20.8) in the placebo arm and 17.5 months (range: 0.1-23.5) in the venetoclax arm.
title
Overall Survival After an Additional 6-Months Follow-up
type
POST_HOC
unit Of Measure
months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice