Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT03069352 · OUTCOME

Change From Baseline in Global Health Status / Quality of Life

A Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Low Dose Cytarabine Versus Low Dose Cytarabine Alone in Treatment Naive Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy · Source last updated 2025-09-30

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
Unit
scores on a scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Error
Time frame
Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7, and 9

What was measured

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core (EORTC QLQ-C30) consists of a Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale, a Financial Difficulties scale, 5 functional scales (Cognitive, Social, Physical, Emotional, and Role Functioning), and 8 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Insomnia, Appetite Loss, Pain, Constipation, Diarrhea, Dyspnea, and Nausea and Vomiting). The GHS/QoL scale includes 2 questions in which participants were asked to rate their overall health and overall quality of life during the past week on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). The 2 scores were averaged and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, where a high score represents a high QoL. A positive change from baseline indicates better quality of life.

Analysis population: Full analysis set with available data at Baseline and each time point

Groups in this outcome

Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)

Participants received matching placebo to venetoclax orally once a day (QD) plus cytarabine 20 mg/m² subcutaneously on Days 1 to 10 of each 28-day cycle.

Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)

Participants received venetoclax 600 mg orally once a day plus cytarabine 20 mg/m² subcutaneously on Days 1 to 10 of each 28-day cycle.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)59
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)127

Reported measurements

Cycle 3 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)22
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)69
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Error
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)1.9414.126Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)4.8572.413Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cycle 5 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)12
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)40
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Error
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)2.6275.047Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)16.0152.853Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cycle 7 Day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)12
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)36
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Error
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)3.4815.337Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)10.5993.092Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Cycle 9 day 1

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)7
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)22
Values in scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Error
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)6.9186.642Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)13.2993.772Not reportedNot reportedNot reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    -6.23
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    12.06
    dispersion Type
    STANDARD_ERROR_OF_MEAN
    dispersion Value
    4.617
    estimate Comment
    A linear mixed-effects regression model with a covariance structure including baseline score, stratification factors (age and AML status) treatment arm, visit, and treatment arm by visit interaction.
    group Description
    Cycle 3 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    param Type
    LS Mean Difference
    param Value
    2.917
  2. ci Lower Limit
    2.18
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    24.59
    dispersion Type
    STANDARD_ERROR_OF_MEAN
    dispersion Value
    5.659
    estimate Comment
    A linear mixed-effects regression model with a covariance structure including baseline score, stratification factors (age and AML status) treatment arm, visit, and treatment arm by visit interaction.
    group Description
    Cycle 5 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    param Type
    LS Mean Difference
    param Value
    13.388
  3. ci Lower Limit
    -4.83
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    19.06
    dispersion Type
    STANDARD_ERROR_OF_MEAN
    dispersion Value
    6.031
    estimate Comment
    A linear mixed-effects regression model with a covariance structure including baseline score, stratification factors (age and AML status) treatment arm, visit, and treatment arm by visit interaction.
    group Description
    Cycle 7 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    param Type
    LS Mean Difference
    param Value
    7.119
  4. ci Lower Limit
    -8.49
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    21.26
    dispersion Type
    STANDARD_ERROR_OF_MEAN
    dispersion Value
    7.511
    estimate Comment
    A linear mixed-effects regression model with a covariance structure including baseline score, stratification factors (age and AML status) treatment arm, visit, and treatment arm by visit interaction.
    group Description
    Cycle 9 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    param Type
    LS Mean Difference
    param Value
    6.381
  5. group Description
    A linear mixed effects regression model with a variable covariance structure was fitted to the longitudinal data (considering all time points) to test for differences between treatment arms.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.085
    statistical Comment
    Model included AML status (de novo vs. secondary), age (18-\< 75 vs. ≥ 75), treatment arm, time, and treatment arm by time interaction as fixed factors
    statistical Method
    Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    -6.23
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    12.06
    dispersion Type
    STANDARD_ERROR_OF_MEAN
    dispersion Value
    4.617
    estimate Comment
    A linear mixed-effects regression model with a covariance structure including baseline score, stratification factors (age and AML status) treatment arm, visit, and treatment arm by visit interaction.
    group Description
    Cycle 3 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    param Type
    LS Mean Difference
    param Value
    2.917
  2. ci Lower Limit
    2.18
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    24.59
    dispersion Type
    STANDARD_ERROR_OF_MEAN
    dispersion Value
    5.659
    estimate Comment
    A linear mixed-effects regression model with a covariance structure including baseline score, stratification factors (age and AML status) treatment arm, visit, and treatment arm by visit interaction.
    group Description
    Cycle 5 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    param Type
    LS Mean Difference
    param Value
    13.388
  3. ci Lower Limit
    -4.83
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    19.06
    dispersion Type
    STANDARD_ERROR_OF_MEAN
    dispersion Value
    6.031
    estimate Comment
    A linear mixed-effects regression model with a covariance structure including baseline score, stratification factors (age and AML status) treatment arm, visit, and treatment arm by visit interaction.
    group Description
    Cycle 7 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    param Type
    LS Mean Difference
    param Value
    7.119
  4. ci Lower Limit
    -8.49
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    21.26
    dispersion Type
    STANDARD_ERROR_OF_MEAN
    dispersion Value
    7.511
    estimate Comment
    A linear mixed-effects regression model with a covariance structure including baseline score, stratification factors (age and AML status) treatment arm, visit, and treatment arm by visit interaction.
    group Description
    Cycle 9 Day 1
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    OTHER
    param Type
    LS Mean Difference
    param Value
    6.381
  5. group Description
    A linear mixed effects regression model with a variable covariance structure was fitted to the longitudinal data (considering all time points) to test for differences between treatment arms.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.085
    statistical Comment
    Model included AML status (de novo vs. secondary), age (18-\< 75 vs. ≥ 75), treatment arm, time, and treatment arm by time interaction as fixed factors
    statistical Method
    Linear Mixed Effects Regression Model
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        spread
        4.126
        value
        1.941
      2. group Id
        OG001
        spread
        2.413
        value
        4.857
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        22
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        69
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 3 Day 1
  2. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        spread
        5.047
        value
        2.627
      2. group Id
        OG001
        spread
        2.853
        value
        16.015
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        12
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        40
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 5 Day 1
  3. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        spread
        5.337
        value
        3.481
      2. group Id
        OG001
        spread
        3.092
        value
        10.599
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        12
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        36
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 7 Day 1
  4. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        spread
        6.642
        value
        6.918
      2. group Id
        OG001
        spread
        3.772
        value
        13.299
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        7
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        22
      units
      Participants
    title
    Cycle 9 day 1
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      59
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      127
    units
    Participants
description
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core (EORTC QLQ-C30) consists of a Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale, a Financial Difficulties scale, 5 functional scales (Cognitive, Social, Physical, Emotional, and Role Functioning), and 8 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Insomnia, Appetite Loss, Pain, Constipation, Diarrhea, Dyspnea, and Nausea and Vomiting). The GHS/QoL scale includes 2 questions in which participants were asked to rate their overall health and overall quality of life during the past week on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). The 2 scores were averaged and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, where a high score represents a high QoL. A positive change from baseline indicates better quality of life.
dispersion Type
Standard Error
groups
  1. description
    Participants received matching placebo to venetoclax orally once a day (QD) plus cytarabine 20 mg/m² subcutaneously on Days 1 to 10 of each 28-day cycle.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Placebo + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)
  2. description
    Participants received venetoclax 600 mg orally once a day plus cytarabine 20 mg/m² subcutaneously on Days 1 to 10 of each 28-day cycle.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Venetoclax + Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC)
param Type
LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
population Description
Full analysis set with available data at Baseline and each time point
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7, and 9
title
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status / Quality of Life
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
scores on a scale

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice