Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT03066778 · OUTCOME

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)

A Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With Etoposide/Platinum (Cisplatin or Carboplatin) for Participants With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475-604/KEYNOTE-604) · Source last updated 2022-10-03

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
NUMBER
Unit
Percentage of Participants
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Up to approximately 30.5 months

What was measured

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a best objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. In this study, RECIST 1.1 was modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. The ORR was calculated using the Miettinen \& Nurminen method stratified by type of platinum therapy (carboplatin or cisplatin), baseline ECOG performance status (0 or 1), and baseline LDH (≤ or \> upper limit of normal) and presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.

Analysis population: The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized.

Groups in this outcome

Pembrolizumab+EP

During each 21-day cycle, participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 PLUS etoposide 100 mg/m\^2 IV on Days 1, 2 and 3 PLUS investigator's choice of platinum therapy (carboplatin titrated to an area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve \[AUC\] 5 IV on Day 1 OR cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1). Participants who stopped pembrolizumab as a result of obtaining a response of stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), complete response (CR) or those who stopped after receiving pembrolizumab for 24 months for reasons other than disease progression or intolerability, were eligible for up to an additional 1 year of treatment after progressive disease if they met the criteria for retreatment.

Placebo+EP

During each 21-day cycle, participants received placebo (normal saline solution) IV on Day 1 PLUS etoposide 100 mg/m\^2 IV on Days 1, 2 and 3 PLUS investigator's choice of platinum therapy (carboplatin titrated to an AUC 5 IV on Day 1 OR cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1).

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Pembrolizumab+EP228
Placebo+EP225

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Percentage of Participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Pembrolizumab+EP70.6Not reported64.276.4Not reported
Placebo+EP61.8Not reported55.168.2Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.2
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    17.4
    estimate Comment
    Based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method stratified by platinum chemotherapy, ECOG, and LDH. Cisplatin, ECOG 0, LDH ≤ULN and Cisplatin, ECOG 0, LDH \>ULN were combined into one stratum because of small sample size
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.02270
    param Type
    Percent Difference
    param Value
    8.9
    statistical Comment
    One-sided p-value for testing. H0: difference in percent = 0 versus H1: difference in percent \> 0.
    statistical Method
    Miettinen & Nurminen
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.2
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    17.4
    estimate Comment
    Based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method stratified by platinum chemotherapy, ECOG, and LDH. Cisplatin, ECOG 0, LDH ≤ULN and Cisplatin, ECOG 0, LDH \>ULN were combined into one stratum because of small sample size
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.02270
    param Type
    Percent Difference
    param Value
    8.9
    statistical Comment
    One-sided p-value for testing. H0: difference in percent = 0 versus H1: difference in percent \> 0.
    statistical Method
    Miettinen & Nurminen
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        64.2
        upper Limit
        76.4
        value
        70.6
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        55.1
        upper Limit
        68.2
        value
        61.8
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      228
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      225
    units
    Participants
description
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a best objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters. In this study, RECIST 1.1 was modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. The ORR was calculated using the Miettinen \& Nurminen method stratified by type of platinum therapy (carboplatin or cisplatin), baseline ECOG performance status (0 or 1), and baseline LDH (≤ or \> upper limit of normal) and presented for the first course of study treatment per protocol.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    During each 21-day cycle, participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 PLUS etoposide 100 mg/m\^2 IV on Days 1, 2 and 3 PLUS investigator's choice of platinum therapy (carboplatin titrated to an area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve \[AUC\] 5 IV on Day 1 OR cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1). Participants who stopped pembrolizumab as a result of obtaining a response of stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), complete response (CR) or those who stopped after receiving pembrolizumab for 24 months for reasons other than disease progression or intolerability, were eligible for up to an additional 1 year of treatment after progressive disease if they met the criteria for retreatment.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Pembrolizumab+EP
  2. description
    During each 21-day cycle, participants received placebo (normal saline solution) IV on Day 1 PLUS etoposide 100 mg/m\^2 IV on Days 1, 2 and 3 PLUS investigator's choice of platinum therapy (carboplatin titrated to an AUC 5 IV on Day 1 OR cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1).
    id
    OG001
    title
    Placebo+EP
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
The analysis population consisted of all randomized participants who were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Up to approximately 30.5 months
title
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
Percentage of Participants

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice