NCT03041311 · OUTCOME
Number of Participants With Any Cycle Delays and the Number of Cycles Delayed (Maintenance Period)
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
- Unit
- Participants
- Interval / dispersion
- Not reported
- Time frame
- Maintenance Period. From date of first maintenance dose, 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 1160 days.
What was measured
After Cycle 1, patients need to meet pre-specified laboratory parameter criteria before initiating Cycle 2 and each subsequent cycle of chemotherapy. A "Cycle Day Status" page asks if the cycle was delayed. If the start of the current cycle was delayed (the site answers "Yes"), this will be counted as a delay. Cycle delays could occur for management of toxicity (hematologic or non-hematologic) or for administrative/logistic reasons. The reason for each cycle delay was captured in the eCRF if it was related to AEs. Reasons other than AEs were not captured.
Analysis population: Safety analysis
Groups in this outcome
Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab
Induction: Patients received trilaciclib 240 mg/m² administered IV once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target AUC = 5 mg/mL/min to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.
Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab
Induction: Patients received placebo administered IV once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was be administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target AUC = 5 mg/mL/min to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 52 |
| Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 53 |
Reported measurements
Number of patients with any cycle delays
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 21 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 26 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
0 cycles
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 20 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 21 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
1 cycle
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 10 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 12 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
2 cycles
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
3 or more cycles
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 5 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab | 8 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 21
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 26
- title
- Number of patients with any cycle delays
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 20
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 21
- title
- 0 cycles
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 10
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 12
- title
- 1 cycle
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 6
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 6
- title
- 2 cycles
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 5
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 8
- title
- 3 or more cycles
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 52
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 53
- units
- Participants
- description
- After Cycle 1, patients need to meet pre-specified laboratory parameter criteria before initiating Cycle 2 and each subsequent cycle of chemotherapy. A "Cycle Day Status" page asks if the cycle was delayed. If the start of the current cycle was delayed (the site answers "Yes"), this will be counted as a delay. Cycle delays could occur for management of toxicity (hematologic or non-hematologic) or for administrative/logistic reasons. The reason for each cycle delay was captured in the eCRF if it was related to AEs. Reasons other than AEs were not captured.
- groups
- description
- Induction: Patients received trilaciclib 240 mg/m² administered IV once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target AUC = 5 mg/mL/min to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.
- id
- OG000
- title
- Trilaciclib+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab
- description
- Induction: Patients received placebo administered IV once daily prior to E/P/A on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day E/P/A therapy cycle (up to 4 cycles in total). Etoposide 100 mg/m² was be administered IV daily on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle. Carboplatin was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle using the Calvert formula with a target AUC = 5 mg/mL/min to calculate the dose. Atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Maintenance: Following the induction phase, patients received maintenance atezolizumab at a dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator.
- id
- OG001
- title
- Placebo+Etoposide/Carboplatin/Atezolizumab
- param Type
- COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
- population Description
- Safety analysis
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Maintenance Period. From date of first maintenance dose, 21 day cycles of Maintenance therapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to 1160 days.
- title
- Number of Participants With Any Cycle Delays and the Number of Cycles Delayed (Maintenance Period)
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Participants
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle