Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinically-Meaningful Improvement in Patient-Reported Function and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) - Neoadjuvant Group
A Study of Atezolizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab in Participants With Newly-Diagnosed Stage III or Stage IV Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer · Source last updated 2023-02-17
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
NUMBER
Unit
Percentage of participants
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 66 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 55 months). Cycle length=21 days.
What was measured
Clinically-meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL during the treatment period, defined as a \>=10-point increase from the baseline score on each of the functional (social, emotional, physical, role) and GHS/QoLscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaires Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
Analysis population: PRO-evaluable population is defined as patients in the ITT population with a baseline and \>=1 post-baseline PRO assessment.
Groups in this outcome
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
Participants in the primary tumor-reductive surgery group received paclitaxel, carboplatin, atezolizumab placebo IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 6 cycles, and bevacizumab IV infusion starting with Cycle 2 for a total of 5 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy bevacizumab with atezolizumab placebo for a total of 22 cycles of atezolizumab placebo and 21 cycles of bevacizumab. Participants in the neoadjuvant therapy group received paclitaxel, carboplatin and placebo for 6 cycles and bevacizumab for 4 cycles. Interval surgery will occur between cycles 3 and 4. Each cycle is 21 days long. After 6 cycles, participants started maintenance therapy of bevacizumab and placebo for additional 16 cycles.
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
Participants in the primary tumor-reductive surgery group received paclitaxel, carboplatin, atezolizumab intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 6 cycles, and bevacizumab IV infusion starting with Cycle 2 for a total of 5 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy bevacizumab with atezolizumab for a total of 22 cycles of atezolizumab and 21 cycles of bevacizumab. Participants in the neoadjuvant therapy group received paclitaxel, carboplatin and atezolizumab for 6 cycles and bevacizumab for 4 cycles. Interval surgery will occur between cycles 3 and 4. Each cycle is 21 days long. After 6 cycles, participants started maintenance therapy of bevacizumab and atezolizumab for additional 16 cycles.
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
157
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
152
Reported measurements
Physical Functioning, Presurgical/Surgery
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
142
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
137
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
35.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
33.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Cycle 4 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
141
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
133
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
28.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
18.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
132
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
133
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
35.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
25.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Cycle 8 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
129
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
123
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
37.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
36.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
111
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
102
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
45.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
43.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Cycle 16 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
96
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
88
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
42.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
42.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Cycle 20 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
83
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
63
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
41.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
31.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Completion of Treatment/Early Termination Visit
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
144
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
131
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
38.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
34.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 3 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
97
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
97
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
37.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
39.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 6 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
76
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
74
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
40.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
39.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 9 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
43
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
38
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
32.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 12 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
17
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
24
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
23.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
37.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 18 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
6
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
4
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
33.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Physical Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 24 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
1
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
2
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
100
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Presurgical/Surgery
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
142
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
137
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
48.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
40.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Cycle 4 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
141
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
133
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
38.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
22.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
133
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
134
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
45.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
33.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Cycle 8 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
129
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
123
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
39.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
111
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
102
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
55.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
47.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Cycle 16 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
96
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
88
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
53.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
46.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Cycle 20 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
83
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
63
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
56.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
52.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Completion of Treatment/ Early Termination Visit
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
145
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
131
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
46.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
39.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 3 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
97
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
97
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
49.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
40.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 6 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
76
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
74
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
51.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
48.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 9 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
43
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
38
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
53.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
52.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 12 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
17
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
24
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
23.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
54.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 18 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
6
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
4
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 24 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
1
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
2
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Presurgical/Surgery
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
142
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
137
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
32.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
33.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Cycle 4 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
141
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
133
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
31.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
25.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
133
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
132
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
36.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
33.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Cycle 8 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
129
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
122
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
40.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
39.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
111
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
101
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
39.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
44.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Cycle 16 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
95
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
88
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
40.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
44.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Cycle 20 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
83
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
62
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
45.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
43.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Completion of Treatment/Early Termination
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
144
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
130
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
40.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
41.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 3 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
96
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
96
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
42.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
44.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 6 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
76
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
74
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
46.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
35.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 9 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
43
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
38
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
46.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
47.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 12 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
17
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
24
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
29.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
54.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 18 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
6
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
4
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
66.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
75.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 24 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
1
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
2
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Presurgical/Surgery
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
142
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
137
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
31.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
30.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 4 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
141
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
132
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
31.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
35.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
133
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
131
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
42.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
38.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 8 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
129
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
123
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
39.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
44.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
111
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
101
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
41.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
41.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 16 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
96
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
88
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
44.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
42.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 20 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
83
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
62
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
44.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
32.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Completion of Treatment/Early Termination Visit
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
145
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
130
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
33.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
33.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 3 months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
96
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
96
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
35.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
33.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 6 months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
76
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
74
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
30.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
33.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 9 months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
43
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
38
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
39.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
34.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 12 months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
17
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
24
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
29.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
29.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 18 months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
6
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
4
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
16.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 24 months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
1
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
2
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, PresurgicalSurgery
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
142
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
137
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
44.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
46.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Cycle 4 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
141
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
132
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
43.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
37.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Cycle 6 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
133
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
132
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
51.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
47.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Cycle 8 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
129
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
122
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
55.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
59.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Cycle 12 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
111
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
101
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
60.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
61.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Cycle 16 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
96
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
88
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
53.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
58.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Cycle 20 Day 1
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
83
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
62
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
59.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
61.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Completion of Treatment/ Early Termination Visit
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
145
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
130
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
46.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
53.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Post-Treatment Follow Up 3 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
95
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
96
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
53.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
53.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Post-Treatment Follow Up 6 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
76
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
74
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
48.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
41.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Post-Treatment Follow Up 9 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
43
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
38
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
39.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Post-Treatment Follow Up 12 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
17
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
24
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
17.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
41.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Post-Treatment Follow Up 18 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
6
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
4
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
16.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
GHS/HRQoL, Post-Treatment Follow Up 24 Months
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
1
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
2
Values in Percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
50.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Source statistical analyses
Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.
ci Lower Limit
0.58
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.62
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Presurgical/Surgery
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.9096
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.97
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.73
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
2.01
group Description
Emotional functioning, Cycle 4 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.4662
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
1.21
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.51
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.40
group Description
Emotional functioning, Cycle 6 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.5237
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.85
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.76
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
2.07
group Description
Emotional functioning, Cycle 8 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.3826
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
1.25
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.56
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.76
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 12 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.9893
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
1.00
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.49
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.61
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 16 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.6892
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.89
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.30
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.17
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 20 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.1324
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.59
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.62
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.70
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Completion of Treatment/Early Termination Visit
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.9176
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
1.03
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.50
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.68
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 3 Months
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.7861
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.92
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.65
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
2.65
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 6 Months
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.4539
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
1.31
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.27
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.86
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 9 Months
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.4849
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.71
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.19
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
3.34
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 12 Months
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.7470
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.79
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Complete source fields
analyses
ci Lower Limit
0.58
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.62
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Presurgical/Surgery
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.9096
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.97
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.73
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
2.01
group Description
Emotional functioning, Cycle 4 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.4662
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
1.21
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.51
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.40
group Description
Emotional functioning, Cycle 6 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.5237
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.85
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.76
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
2.07
group Description
Emotional functioning, Cycle 8 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.3826
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
1.25
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.56
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.76
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 12 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.9893
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
1.00
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.49
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.61
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 16 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.6892
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.89
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.30
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.17
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Cycle 20 Day 1
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.1324
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.59
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.62
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.70
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Completion of Treatment/Early Termination Visit
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.9176
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
1.03
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.50
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.68
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 3 Months
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.7861
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.92
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.65
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
2.65
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 6 Months
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.4539
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
1.31
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.27
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
1.86
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 9 Months
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.4849
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.71
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
ci Lower Limit
0.19
ci Num Sides
TWO_SIDED
ci Pct Value
95
ci Upper Limit
3.34
group Description
Emotional Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 12 Months
group Ids
OG000
OG001
non Inferiority Comment
Stratified Analysis
non Inferiority Type
SUPERIORITY
p Value
0.7470
param Type
Odds Ratio (OR)
param Value
0.79
statistical Method
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
35.9
group Id
OG001
value
33.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
142
group Id
OG001
value
137
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Presurgical/Surgery
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
28.4
group Id
OG001
value
18.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
141
group Id
OG001
value
133
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Cycle 4 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
35.6
group Id
OG001
value
25.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
132
group Id
OG001
value
133
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Cycle 6 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
37.2
group Id
OG001
value
36.6
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
129
group Id
OG001
value
123
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Cycle 8 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
45.9
group Id
OG001
value
43.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
111
group Id
OG001
value
102
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Cycle 12 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
42.7
group Id
OG001
value
42.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
96
group Id
OG001
value
88
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Cycle 16 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
41.0
group Id
OG001
value
31.7
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
83
group Id
OG001
value
63
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Cycle 20 Day 1
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
38.9
group Id
OG001
value
34.4
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
144
group Id
OG001
value
131
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Completion of Treatment/Early Termination Visit
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
37.1
group Id
OG001
value
39.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
97
group Id
OG001
value
97
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 3 Months
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
40.8
group Id
OG001
value
39.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
76
group Id
OG001
value
74
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 6 Months
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
32.6
group Id
OG001
value
50.0
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
43
group Id
OG001
value
38
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 9 Months
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
23.5
group Id
OG001
value
37.5
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
17
group Id
OG001
value
24
units
Participants
title
Physical Functioning, Post-Treatment Follow Up 12 Months
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
157
group Id
OG001
value
152
units
Participants
description
Clinically-meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL during the treatment period, defined as a \>=10-point increase from the baseline score on each of the functional (social, emotional, physical, role) and GHS/QoLscales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaires Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
groups
description
Participants in the primary tumor-reductive surgery group received paclitaxel, carboplatin, atezolizumab placebo IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 6 cycles, and bevacizumab IV infusion starting with Cycle 2 for a total of 5 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy bevacizumab with atezolizumab placebo for a total of 22 cycles of atezolizumab placebo and 21 cycles of bevacizumab. Participants in the neoadjuvant therapy group received paclitaxel, carboplatin and placebo for 6 cycles and bevacizumab for 4 cycles. Interval surgery will occur between cycles 3 and 4. Each cycle is 21 days long. After 6 cycles, participants started maintenance therapy of bevacizumab and placebo for additional 16 cycles.
id
OG000
title
Placebo With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
description
Participants in the primary tumor-reductive surgery group received paclitaxel, carboplatin, atezolizumab intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 6 cycles, and bevacizumab IV infusion starting with Cycle 2 for a total of 5 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy bevacizumab with atezolizumab for a total of 22 cycles of atezolizumab and 21 cycles of bevacizumab. Participants in the neoadjuvant therapy group received paclitaxel, carboplatin and atezolizumab for 6 cycles and bevacizumab for 4 cycles. Interval surgery will occur between cycles 3 and 4. Each cycle is 21 days long. After 6 cycles, participants started maintenance therapy of bevacizumab and atezolizumab for additional 16 cycles.
id
OG001
title
Atezolizumab With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Bevacizumab
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
PRO-evaluable population is defined as patients in the ITT population with a baseline and \>=1 post-baseline PRO assessment.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 66 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 55 months). Cycle length=21 days.
title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinically-Meaningful Improvement in Patient-Reported Function and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) - Neoadjuvant Group