Skip to content
← Study library

NCT03036098 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab or Standard of Care Chemotherapy Compared to the Standard of Care Chemotherapy Alone in Treatment of Participants With Untreated Inoperable or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
PHASE3
Status at capture
ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING
Registry last update
2026-03-06

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an investigational immunotherapy nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab or in combination with standard of care chemotherapy is more effective than standard of care chemotherapy alone in treating participants with previously untreated inoperable or metastatic urothelial cancer.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

flow

Participant flow

→

baseline

Baseline characteristics

→

outcome · POSTED

Overall Survival (OS) in Cisplatin-ineligible Randomized Participants for Primary Study

→

outcome · POSTED

Overall Survival (OS) in Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive (≥ 1%) Randomized Participants by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Primary Study

→

outcome · POSTED

Overall Survival (OS) in All Randomized Participants for Primary Study

→

outcome · POSTED

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] in Cisplatin-ineligible Randomized Participants for Primary Study

→

outcome · POSTED

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] in Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive (≥ 1%) Participants for Primary Study

→

outcome · POSTED

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] in All Randomized Participants for Primary Study

→

outcome · POSTED

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Care Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Score in All Randomized Participants for Primary Study

→

outcome · POSTED

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] in Cisplatin-eligible Participants for Sub-study

→

outcome · POSTED

Overall Survival (OS) in Cisplatin-eligible Participants for Sub-study

→

outcome · POSTED

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Care Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Score for Sub-study

→

outcome · POSTED

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression at ≥1% Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Sub-study

→

outcome · POSTED

Overall Survival (OS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression at ≥1% Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Sub-study

→

adverse events

Adverse events

→

more info

Limitations, agreements, and source contact

→
Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Histological or cytological evidence of metastatic or surgically inoperable transitional cell cancer (TCC) of the urothelium involving the renal pelvis, ureter, bladder or urethra * No prior systemic chemotherapy for metastatic or surgically inoperable urothelial cancer (UC) * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1 * Women and men must agree to follow specific methods of contraception, if applicable Exclusion Criteria: * Disease that is suitable for local therapy administered with curative intent * Any serious or uncontrolled medical disorder in the opinion of the investigator that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration or interfere with the interpretation of study results * Prior treatment with an anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-CD137, or anti-CTLA-4 antibody, or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathways Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
healthy Volunteers
false
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. intervention Names
    1. Biological: Nivolumab
    2. Biological: Ipilimumab
    label
    Arm A: Investigational immunotherapy
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. intervention Names
    1. Drug: Gemcitabine
    2. Drug: Cisplatin
    3. Drug: Carboplatin
    label
    Arm B: Standard of care chemotherapy
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
  3. intervention Names
    1. Biological: Nivolumab
    2. Drug: Gemcitabine
    3. Drug: Cisplatin
    label
    Arm C: Investigational immunotherapy
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  4. intervention Names
    1. Drug: Gemcitabine
    2. Drug: Cisplatin
    label
    Arm D: Standard of care chemotherapy
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Arm A: Investigational immunotherapy
    2. Arm C: Investigational immunotherapy
    description
    Specified Dose on Specified Days
    name
    Nivolumab
    other Names
    1. BMS-936558
    2. Opdivo
    type
    BIOLOGICAL
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Arm A: Investigational immunotherapy
    description
    Specified Dose on Specified Days
    name
    Ipilimumab
    other Names
    1. BMS-734016
    2. Yervoy
    type
    BIOLOGICAL
  3. arm Group Labels
    1. Arm B: Standard of care chemotherapy
    2. Arm C: Investigational immunotherapy
    3. Arm D: Standard of care chemotherapy
    description
    Specified Dose on Specified Days
    name
    Gemcitabine
    type
    DRUG
  4. arm Group Labels
    1. Arm B: Standard of care chemotherapy
    2. Arm C: Investigational immunotherapy
    3. Arm D: Standard of care chemotherapy
    description
    Specified Dose on Specified Days
    name
    Cisplatin
    type
    DRUG
  5. arm Group Labels
    1. Arm B: Standard of care chemotherapy
    description
    Specified Dose on Specified Days
    name
    Carboplatin
    type
    DRUG
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
1314
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    This measure looks at how long participants who cannot receive cisplatin (a type of chemotherapy) live after being placed into a treatment group in the primary study. Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the date a participant is randomized (assigned to a treatment group) and the date of death from any cause. For participants without documentation of death, OS will be measured up to the last date the participant was known to be alive. If a participant was randomized but had no follow-up information, OS will be counted from the date of randomization. This helps to understand if the treatment can help people who are unable to receive cisplatin chemotherapy live longer.
    measure
    Overall Survival (OS) in Cisplatin-ineligible Randomized Participants for Primary Study
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause, or data cut-off date, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 89 months)
  2. description
    This measure looks at how long participants with PD-L1 positive tumors (meaning their tumor cells have at least 1% PD-L1, as determined by a laboratory test called immunohistochemistry or IHC) live after being placed into a treatment group in the primary study. Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the date a participant is randomized (assigned to a treatment group) and the date of death from any cause. For participants without documentation of death, OS will be measured up to the last date the participant was known to be alive. If a participant was randomized but had no follow-up information, OS will be counted from the date of randomization. This helps to understand whether the treatment can help people with PD-L1 positive tumors live longer.
    measure
    Overall Survival (OS) in Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive (≥ 1%) Randomized Participants by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Primary Study
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause, or data cut-off date, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 89 months)
  3. description
    This measure looks at how long people who can receive cisplatin chemotherapy live without their cancer getting worse after being assigned to a treatment group in the sub-study. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is the time from when a participant is assigned to a group (randomization) until their cancer is first shown to get worse (progress), based on reviews by independent experts who do not know which treatment was given. These experts use standard rules (RECIST 1.1) to decide if the cancer has progressed. If a participant dies before their cancer is shown to get worse, the date of death will be used as the time their disease progressed. If a participant's cancer does not get worse and they do not die during the study, their PFS will be measured up to the date of their last tumor check. This helps to understand if the treatment helps people eligible for cisplatin live longer without their cancer progressing.
    measure
    Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] in Cisplatin-eligible Participants for Sub-study
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 89 months)
  4. description
    This measure looks at how long people who are able to receive cisplatin (a type of chemotherapy) live after being placed into a treatment group in the sub-study. Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the date a participant is randomized (assigned to a treatment group) and the date of death from any cause. For participants without documentation of death, OS will be measured up to the last date the participant was known to be alive. If a participant was randomized but had no follow-up information, OS will be counted from the date of randomization. This helps to understand if the treatment can help people who are eligible for cisplatin chemotherapy live longer.
    measure
    Overall Survival (OS) in Cisplatin-eligible Participants for Sub-study
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause, or data cut-off date, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 89 months)
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    This measure looks at how long all participants live after being placed into a treatment group in the primary study. Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the date a participant is randomized (assigned to a treatment group) and the date of death from any cause. For participants without documentation of death, OS will be measured up to the last date the participant was known to be alive. If a participant was randomized but had no follow-up information, OS will be counted from the date of randomization. This helps to understand whether the treatment can help all participants in the study live longer.
    measure
    Overall Survival (OS) in All Randomized Participants for Primary Study
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause, or data cut-off date, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 89 months)
  2. description
    This measure looks at how long people who cannot receive cisplatin chemotherapy live without their cancer getting worse after being assigned to a treatment group in the primary study. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is the time from when a participant is assigned to a group (randomization) until their cancer is first shown to get worse (progress), based on reviews by independent experts who do not know which treatment was given. These experts use standard rules (RECIST 1.1) to decide if the cancer has progressed. If a participant dies before their cancer is shown to get worse, the date of death will be used as the time their disease progressed. If a participant's cancer does not get worse and they do not die during the study, their PFS will be measured up to the date of their last tumor check. This helps to understand if the treatment helps people unable to receive cisplatin live longer without their cancer progressing.
    measure
    Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] in Cisplatin-ineligible Randomized Participants for Primary Study
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 89 months)
  3. description
    This measure looks at how long people with PD-L1 positive tumors (meaning their tumor cells have at least 1% PD-L1, as determined by a lab test) live without their cancer getting worse after being assigned to a treatment group in the primary study. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is the time from when a participant is assigned to a group (randomization) until their cancer is first shown to get worse (progress), based on reviews by independent experts who do not know which treatment was given. These experts use standard rules (RECIST 1.1) to decide if the cancer has progressed. If a participant dies before their cancer is shown to get worse, the date of death will be used as the time their disease progressed. If a participant's cancer does not get worse and they do not die during the study, their PFS will be measured up to the date of their last tumor check. This helps to understand if the treatment helps people with PD-L1 positive tumors live longer without their cancer progressing.
    measure
    Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] in Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive (≥ 1%) Participants for Primary Study
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 89 months)
  4. description
    This measure looks at how long all participants in the primary study live without their cancer getting worse after being assigned to a treatment group. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from when a participant is assigned to a treatment group (randomization) until their cancer is first shown to get worse (progress), based on reviews by independent experts who do not know which treatment the participant received. These experts use standard rules (called RECIST 1.1) to decide if the cancer has progressed. If a participant dies before their cancer is shown to get worse, the date of death will be used as the time their disease progressed. If a participant's cancer does not get worse and they do not die during the study, their PFS will be measured up to the date of their last tumor check. This helps to understand whether the treatment can help participants live longer without their cancer progressing.
    measure
    Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] in All Randomized Participants for Primary Study
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 89 months)
  5. description
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire used to assess the quality of life in cancer patients. It includes a global health status score, which is measured on a 4-point Likert scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, and 4 = very much. Responses are combined and converted to scores ranging from 0 to 100. A high score for global health status or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicates a high overall HRQoL.
    measure
    Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Care Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Score in All Randomized Participants for Primary Study
    time Frame
    At Baseline, Week 4, Week 10, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96, Week 108, Week 120, Week 144, Week 156, Week 168, Week 180 and Week 192
  6. description
    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire used to assess the quality of life in cancer patients. It includes a global health status score, which is measured on a 4-point Likert scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, and 4 = very much. Responses are combined and converted to scores ranging from 0 to 100. A high score for global health status or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicates a high overall HRQoL.
    measure
    Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Care Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Score for Sub-study
    time Frame
    At Baseline, Week 4, Week 10, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96, Week 108, and Week 120
  7. description
    This measure looks at how long participants with PD-L1 positive tumors (meaning their tumor cells have at least 1% PD-L1, as determined by a lab test called immunohistochemistry or IHC) live without their cancer getting worse after being assigned to a treatment group in the sub-study. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is the time from when a participant is assigned to a group (randomization) until their cancer is first shown to get worse (progress), based on reviews by independent experts who do not know which treatment was given. These experts use standard rules (RECIST 1.1) to decide if the cancer has progressed. If a participant dies before their cancer is shown to get worse, the date of death will be used as the time their disease progressed. If a participant's cancer does not get worse and they do not die during the study, their PFS will be measured up to the date of their last tumor check.
    measure
    Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression at ≥1% Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Sub-study
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 89 months)
  8. description
    This measure looks at how long participants with PD-L1 positive tumors (meaning their tumor cells have at least 1% PD-L1, as determined by a laboratory test called immunohistochemistry or IHC) live after being placed into a treatment group in the sub-study. Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the date a participant is randomized (assigned to a treatment group) and the date of death from any cause. For participants without documentation of death, OS will be measured up to the last date the participant was known to be alive. If a participant was randomized but had no follow-up information, OS will be counted from the date of randomization. This helps to understand whether the treatment can help people with PD-L1 positive tumors live longer. The results are reviewed by independent experts who do not know which treatment each participant received, using standard criteria for measuring tumor response.
    measure
    Overall Survival (OS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) [Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1] by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression at ≥1% Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Sub-study
    time Frame
    From the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause, or data cut-off date, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 89 months)
Full study description
brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an investigational immunotherapy nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab or in combination with standard of care chemotherapy is more effective than standard of care chemotherapy alone in treating participants with previously untreated inoperable or metastatic urothelial cancer.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Tomita Y, Ye DW, Fujii A, Takeuchi N. Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin for previously untreated unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: an Asian subgroup analysis from the global phase 3 CheckMate 901 trial. Urol Oncol. 2025 Dec;43(12):696.e9-696.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.022. Epub 2025 Sep 26.
    pmid
    41015742
    type
    DERIVED
  2. citation
    van der Heijden MS, Sonpavde G, Powles T, Necchi A, Burotto M, Schenker M, Sade JP, Bamias A, Beuzeboc P, Bedke J, Oldenburg J, Chatta G, Urun Y, Ye D, He Z, Valderrama BP, Ku JH, Tomita Y, Filian J, Wang L, Purcea D, Patel MY, Nasroulah F, Galsky MD; CheckMate 901 Trial Investigators. Nivolumab plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 9;389(19):1778-1789. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2309863. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
    pmid
    37870949
    type
    DERIVED
see Also Links
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-9f3558099e40c1a6e5df
      requested nct id
      NCT03036098
      primary nct id
      NCT03036098
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      d004d1a25713f3939b8366f7d7de3ae4886ddfdf4f08d0515fd1af8b653dd64d
      payload sha256
      7bc50aedf8b1d2e7b10f542cde2fab28d103561ee3accf8c3c10449f299c74e3
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-9f3558099e40c1a6e5df
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT03036098
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        motherapy plus immunotherapy):</p> <div class="pdq-content-list"><ol id="_732"><li>A phase III, randomized controlled trial (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT03036098">CheckMate901</a> [NCT03036098]) included 608 patients (304 to each arm). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisp
        end
        232508
        exact text
        NCT03036098
        start
        232497
      2. context exact
        /p> <div class="pdq-content-list"><ol id="_732"><li>A phase III, randomized controlled trial (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT03036098">CheckMate901</a> [NCT03036098]) included 608 patients (304 to each arm). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin or gemcitabine and cispla
        end
        232539
        exact text
        NCT03036098
        start
        232528
      3. context exact
        motherapy plus immunotherapy):</p> <div class="pdq-content-list"><ol id="_748"><li>A phase III, randomized controlled trial (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT03036098">CheckMate901</a> [NCT03036098]) included 608 patients (304 to each arm). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisp
        end
        246410
        exact text
        NCT03036098
        start
        246399
      4. context exact
        /p> <div class="pdq-content-list"><ol id="_748"><li>A phase III, randomized controlled trial (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT03036098">CheckMate901</a> [NCT03036098]) included 608 patients (304 to each arm). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin or gemcitabine and cispla
        end
        246441
        exact text
        NCT03036098
        start
        246430
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/bfe4093c3353740f43.html
      source file sha256
      d004d1a25713f3939b8366f7d7de3ae4886ddfdf4f08d0515fd1af8b653dd64d
      source json pointer
      Source null
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source retrieved at
      2026-09-09T23:21:29.452854+00:00
      source string basis
      UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
      source string sha256
      b3ae3d481d6c021159ccf142888af179236377780edb2abdecc7ed7b5ce43789
      source title
      Bladder Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
      source update dates
      1. context
        Updated: May 2, 2025
        datetime
        2025-05-02T12:00:00Z
        display
        May 2, 2025

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice