NCT02927938 · REGISTRY CONDITION SEARCH
Leukemia Stem Cell Detection in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Found through the registry condition index, not selected as a treatment recommendation. This discovery collection was restricted to studies with posted results.
- Phase
- PHASE3
- Status at capture
- TERMINATED
- Registry last update
- 2022-04-21
Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) achieve complete remission (CR) following induction chemotherapy. However, a large majority subsequently relapse and succumb to the disease. Currently, cytogenetics and molecular aberrations are the best prognostic indicators; however, these factors cannot prognosticate accurately for individual patients. Overall, the majority of patients with favorable or intermediate-risk AML will experience relapse. Prognosis after relapse is dismal with a five-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. A leukemia stem cell (LSC) paradigm may explain this failure of CR to reliably translate into cure. This study is undertaken to determine whether the presence of LSCs has prognostic value as well as to determine whether the presence of LSCs has predictive value. This study has an observational component, whereby we intent evaluate whether the presence or absence of LSCs is prognostic. This study also has an interventional component in which it uses LSC status to determine whether favorable and intermediate risk AML patients in CR receive consolidation with chemotherapy or allogeneic HCT.
Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record
What did the study report?
Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.
Who could take part
- eligibility Criteria
- Inclusion Criteria: 1. Must have previously signed the specimen procurement protocol consent associated with the leukemia stem cell assay ("Step 1 informed consent") prior to starting AML therapy. 2. Age 18 years and older 3. New diagnosis of AML, other than APL, confirmed by bone marrow aspirate/biopsy and reviewed by an institutional hematopathologist 4. Completion of induction therapy, as defined by the Investigator and post-induction bone marrow biopsy. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Any debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude ability to follow study procedures. 2. Indeterminate leukemia stem cell assay results at diagnosis.
- healthy Volunteers
- false
- minimum Age
- 18 Years
- sex
- ALL
- std Ages
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
- arm Groups
- description
- Other - Standard of Care Consolidation (HCT) Enrolled subjects that will contribute to the population of subjects who are evaluable for the primary and secondary objectives. This will not include any subjects who end up in either observational cohort. To be included in the evaluable cohort, the subject must meet the following requirements: 1. Complete remission (CR1) from standard cytarabine or HMA-based induction therapy per standard clinical criteria (Cheson Criteria) 2. Have confirmed presence of CD34+CD38-ALDHint population by flow cytometry at the diagnostic LSC assay (LSC0) 3. Cytarabine-based induction subjects: Are candidates for (as determined by the investigator) and receive consolidation therapy (cytarabine-based chemotherapy or HCT); HMA-based induction subjects: Are candidates for (as determined by the investigator) and receive HCT
- intervention Names
- Procedure: Allogeneic HCT
- label
- Evaluable Cohort - Transplant Arm
- type
- OTHER
- description
- Other - Standard of Care Consolidation (cytarabine-based chemo) Enrolled subjects that will contribute to the population of subjects who are evaluable for the primary and secondary objectives. This will not include any subjects who end up in either observational cohort. To be included in the evaluable cohort, the subject must meet the following requirements: 1. Complete remission (CR1) from standard cytarabine or HMA-based induction therapy per standard clinical criteria (Cheson Criteria) 2. Have confirmed presence of CD34+CD38-ALDHint population by flow cytometry at the diagnostic LSC assay (LSC0) 3. Cytarabine-based induction subjects: Are candidates for (as determined by the investigator) and receive consolidation therapy (cytarabine-based chemotherapy or HCT)
- intervention Names
- Drug: Consolidation chemotherapy
- label
- Evaluable Cohort - Consolidation Chemo Arm
- type
- OTHER
- description
- Enrolled subjects who do not achieve a CR to induction therapy, regardless of diagnostic phenotype. Following completion of induction therapy and remission bone marrow aspirate, if a subject is determined to not have achieved a complete remission to induction therapy, he or she would be included in observational cohort 1.
- label
- Observational Cohort 1
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- description
- Enrolled subjects who achieve a CR to induction therapy but meet one or more of the following criteria: * Lack the immunophenotype of interest, * Cytarabine based induction subjects: Are not candidates for \[as determined by the investigator (e.g. unfit or refusal)\] and do not receive consolidation therapy (cytarabine-based chemotherapy or HCT) * HMA-based induction subjects: Are not candidates for \[as determined by the investigator (e.g. unfit, lack of donor, refusal)\] and do not receive HCT Final investigator determination of fit-ness can occur at any time until the start of consolidation therapy. HMA-based induction subjects will not receive consolidation cytarabine-based chemotherapy as part of the evaluable cohort if they do not receive HCT.
- label
- Observational Cohort 2
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- interventions
- arm Group Labels
- Evaluable Cohort - Transplant Arm
- description
- Allogeneic HCT
- name
- Allogeneic HCT
- other Names
- transplant, allo HCT, PBSCT, SCT, BMT
- type
- PROCEDURE
- arm Group Labels
- Evaluable Cohort - Consolidation Chemo Arm
- description
- Cytarabine-based consolidation chemotherapy
- name
- Consolidation chemotherapy
- other Names
- cytarabine, HiDAc, high dose cytarabine
- type
- DRUG
Study design
- allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- masking Info
- masking
- NONE
- primary Purpose
- TREATMENT
Enrollment
- count
- 18
- type
- ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
- primary Outcomes
- description
- Comparison of 2 year RFS in patient with detectable LSCs in the marrow at the end of consolidation to the 2 year RFS of patients without detectable LSCs. IWG Criteria (Cheson 2003) was utilized to classify relapse, with relapse defined as ≥ 5% blasts in the marrow or peripheral blood, extramedullary disease, or disease presence determined by a physician upon clinical assessment.
- measure
- 2 Year Relapse Free Survival (RFS)
- time Frame
- 2 years
Full study description
- brief Summary
- Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) achieve complete remission (CR) following induction chemotherapy. However, a large majority subsequently relapse and succumb to the disease. Currently, cytogenetics and molecular aberrations are the best prognostic indicators; however, these factors cannot prognosticate accurately for individual patients. Overall, the majority of patients with favorable or intermediate-risk AML will experience relapse. Prognosis after relapse is dismal with a five-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. A leukemia stem cell (LSC) paradigm may explain this failure of CR to reliably translate into cure. This study is undertaken to determine whether the presence of LSCs has prognostic value as well as to determine whether the presence of LSCs has predictive value. This study has an observational component, whereby we intent evaluate whether the presence or absence of LSCs is prognostic. This study also has an interventional component in which it uses LSC status to determine whether favorable and intermediate risk AML patients in CR receive consolidation with chemotherapy or allogeneic HCT.
Source references
Source notices and limitations
Discovery and provenance
- release id
- ctgov-registry-1336d216cbd1bbff780dac70
- edge id
- nct-edge-84f6c7d3bed81fd94056
- requested nct id
- NCT02927938
- primary nct id
- NCT02927938
- source kind
- ctgov_condition_query
- source record id
- Source null
- source file sha256
- a6089e8b15d43633ec778b2a5c464ada1207289beea2ae90de3e4bbe04b32186
- payload sha256
- b267548d5b265e3ee271839bd295eedb1c5eb39584635b2bae2fa347e066fbe6
- payload
- clinical indication matching status
- condition_index_match_asserted_by_registry_not_reviewed
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-84f6c7d3bed81fd94056
- link basis
- returned_by_explicit_condition_and_posted_results_filter_query
- nct id
- NCT02927938
- occurrences
- context exact
- NCT02927938
- end
- 11
- exact text
- NCT02927938
- start
- 0
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- query cond
- Acute Undifferentiated Leukemia
- query disease state id
- ds-acute-undifferentiated-leukemia
- source file
- /Users/arunverma/Documents/ChatGPT/Cancer Statistics Website/research-data/2026-09-10/clinicaltrials-condition/round-0000/raw/cond-acute-undifferentiated-leukemia-000.json
- source file sha256
- a6089e8b15d43633ec778b2a5c464ada1207289beea2ae90de3e4bbe04b32186
- source json pointer
- /studies/39/protocolSection/identificationModule/nctId
- source kind
- ctgov_condition_query
- source record id
- Source null
- source string basis
- parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
- source string sha256
- 3e74e7d6edbd895a8275838dafac57d9d350f378871a249a0907f47eb5dcfff3
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle