Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT02853305 · OUTCOME

Pembro Combo vs Chemo: Overall Survival (OS)

Study of Pembrolizumab With or Without Platinum-based Combination Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Urothelial Carcinoma (MK-3475-361/KEYNOTE-361) · Source last updated 2023-09-08

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
Months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Up to approximately 42 months

What was measured

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. Per protocol, OS in the pembro combo arm was compared to the chemo arm as a pre-specified primary analysis of the ITT population (all randomized participants). OS is reported here for all participants in the pembro combo arm and chemo arm. Per protocol, OS was compared separately between all participants of the pembro arm and chemo arm and is presented later in the record.

Analysis population: All participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro combo arm and chemo arm were included in the analysis. Per protocol, the pembro arm was compared to the chemo arm separately and not included in this analysis.

Groups in this outcome

Pembrolizumab + ST Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)

Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for a maximum of 35 doses PLUS standard therapy (ST) chemotherapy with EITHER cisplatin 70 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 (or Day 2 if required per local guidelines) of each 3-week cycle plus gemcitabine IV infusion 1,000 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 3-week cycle, OR carboplatin at an area under the curve 5 (AUC 5) (or AUC 4.5 if required per local guidelines) IV on Day 1 (or Day 2 if required per local guidelines) of each 3-week cycle plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 3-week cycle.

Pembrolizumab (Pembro)

Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for a maximum of 35 doses.

ST Chemotherapy (Chemo)

Participants received ST chemotherapy with EITHER cisplatin 70 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 (or Day 2 if required per local guidelines) of each 3-week cycle plus gemcitabine IV infusion 1,000 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 3-week cycle OR carboplatin at AUC 5 (or AUC 4.5 if required per local guidelines) IV on Day 1 (or Day 2 if required per local guidelines) of each 3-week cycle plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 3-week cycle.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Pembrolizumab + ST Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)351
Pembrolizumab (Pembro)0
ST Chemotherapy (Chemo)352

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Pembrolizumab + ST Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)17.0Not reported14.519.5Not reported
ST Chemotherapy (Chemo)14.3Not reported12.316.7Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.72
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.02
    group Description
    OS in all participants of the pembro combo arm was compared to OS in all participants of the chemo arm to address the second primary hypothesis (superiority to chemo). The HR and its 95% CI were estimated using a stratified Cox regression model with Efron's method of tie handling with treatment as a covariate stratified by investigator's choice of chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin) and PD-L1 status (CPS\<10 vs. CPS≥10) at baseline.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.0407
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.86
    statistical Comment
    The treatment difference in OS was assessed by the stratified log-rank test.
    statistical Method
    Stratified Log-Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.72
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.02
    group Description
    OS in all participants of the pembro combo arm was compared to OS in all participants of the chemo arm to address the second primary hypothesis (superiority to chemo). The HR and its 95% CI were estimated using a stratified Cox regression model with Efron's method of tie handling with treatment as a covariate stratified by investigator's choice of chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin) and PD-L1 status (CPS\<10 vs. CPS≥10) at baseline.
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.0407
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.86
    statistical Comment
    The treatment difference in OS was assessed by the stratified log-rank test.
    statistical Method
    Stratified Log-Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        14.5
        upper Limit
        19.5
        value
        17.0
      2. group Id
        OG002
        lower Limit
        12.3
        upper Limit
        16.7
        value
        14.3
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      351
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      0
    3. group Id
      OG002
      value
      352
    units
    Participants
description
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. Per protocol, OS in the pembro combo arm was compared to the chemo arm as a pre-specified primary analysis of the ITT population (all randomized participants). OS is reported here for all participants in the pembro combo arm and chemo arm. Per protocol, OS was compared separately between all participants of the pembro arm and chemo arm and is presented later in the record.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for a maximum of 35 doses PLUS standard therapy (ST) chemotherapy with EITHER cisplatin 70 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 (or Day 2 if required per local guidelines) of each 3-week cycle plus gemcitabine IV infusion 1,000 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 3-week cycle, OR carboplatin at an area under the curve 5 (AUC 5) (or AUC 4.5 if required per local guidelines) IV on Day 1 (or Day 2 if required per local guidelines) of each 3-week cycle plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 3-week cycle.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Pembrolizumab + ST Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)
  2. description
    Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for a maximum of 35 doses.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Pembrolizumab (Pembro)
  3. description
    Participants received ST chemotherapy with EITHER cisplatin 70 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 (or Day 2 if required per local guidelines) of each 3-week cycle plus gemcitabine IV infusion 1,000 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 3-week cycle OR carboplatin at AUC 5 (or AUC 4.5 if required per local guidelines) IV on Day 1 (or Day 2 if required per local guidelines) of each 3-week cycle plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 3-week cycle.
    id
    OG002
    title
    ST Chemotherapy (Chemo)
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
All participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro combo arm and chemo arm were included in the analysis. Per protocol, the pembro arm was compared to the chemo arm separately and not included in this analysis.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Up to approximately 42 months
title
Pembro Combo vs Chemo: Overall Survival (OS)
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice