NCT02823574 · OUTCOME
Progression Free Survival (PFS) - Platinum Eligible Subgroup Based on PD-L1 Status
Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Placebo in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck · Source last updated 2023-05-03
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEDIAN
- Unit
- Months
- Interval / dispersion
- 95% Confidence Interval
- Time frame
- From randomization to disease progression or death. Approximately 63 Months
What was measured
The time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Tumor PD-L1 expression was defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per validated Dako PD-L1 IHC assay
Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Analysis population: Platinum eligible subgroup
Groups in this outcome
Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup
Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) who are platinum naive or have recurred 6 months or more after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W
Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup
Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) who are platinum naive or have recurred 6 months or more after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab-Placebo Q6W
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 123 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 61 |
|---|
Reported measurements
<1%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 51 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 23 |
|---|
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 2.61 | Not reported | 1.38 | 5.78 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 2.73 | Not reported | 1.41 | 9.82 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: ≥ 1%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 65 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 33 |
|---|
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 2.89 | Not reported | 1.51 | 4.21 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 2.99 | Not reported | 1.38 | 5.65 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: < 25%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 87 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 37 |
|---|
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 2.37 | Not reported | 1.41 | 2.76 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 2.76 | Not reported | 1.41 | 5.65 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: ≥ 25%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 29 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 19 |
|---|
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 5.75 | Not reported | 3.71 | 16.59 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 2.99 | Not reported | 1.38 | NA | Insufficient number of events to calculate upper limit number. |
|---|
PD-L1: <50%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 96 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 41 |
|---|
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 2.55 | Not reported | 1.45 | 2.89 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 2.76 | Not reported | 1.41 | 5.65 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: > 50%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 20 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 15 |
|---|
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 4.21 | Not reported | 2.79 | NA | Insufficient number of events to calculate upper limit number. |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 2.99 | Not reported | 1.38 | NA | Insufficient number of events to calculate upper limit number. |
|---|
PD-L1: 1 - < 25%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 36 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 14 |
|---|
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 1.51 | Not reported | 1.41 | 2.86 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 3.10 | Not reported | 1.28 | 8.28 | Not reported |
|---|
Without quantifiable PD-L1 expression at baseline
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 7 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 5 |
|---|
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 6.47 | Not reported | 1.51 | NA | Insufficient number of events to calculate upper limit number. |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 13.73 | Not reported | 1.28 | 49.84 | Not reported |
|---|
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 1.38
- upper Limit
- 5.78
- value
- 2.61
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 1.41
- upper Limit
- 9.82
- value
- 2.73
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 51
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 23
- units
- Participants
- title
- <1%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 1.51
- upper Limit
- 4.21
- value
- 2.89
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 1.38
- upper Limit
- 5.65
- value
- 2.99
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 65
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 33
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: ≥ 1%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 1.41
- upper Limit
- 2.76
- value
- 2.37
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 1.41
- upper Limit
- 5.65
- value
- 2.76
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 87
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 37
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: < 25%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 3.71
- upper Limit
- 16.59
- value
- 5.75
- comment
- Insufficient number of events to calculate upper limit number.
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 1.38
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- 2.99
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 29
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 19
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: ≥ 25%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 1.45
- upper Limit
- 2.89
- value
- 2.55
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 1.41
- upper Limit
- 5.65
- value
- 2.76
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 96
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 41
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: <50%
- categories
- measurements
- comment
- Insufficient number of events to calculate upper limit number.
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 2.79
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- 4.21
- comment
- Insufficient number of events to calculate upper limit number.
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 1.38
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- 2.99
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 20
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 15
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: > 50%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 1.41
- upper Limit
- 2.86
- value
- 1.51
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 1.28
- upper Limit
- 8.28
- value
- 3.10
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 36
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 14
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: 1 - < 25%
- categories
- measurements
- comment
- Insufficient number of events to calculate upper limit number.
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 1.51
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- 6.47
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 1.28
- upper Limit
- 49.84
- value
- 13.73
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 7
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 5
- units
- Participants
- title
- Without quantifiable PD-L1 expression at baseline
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 123
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 61
- units
- Participants
- description
- The time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Tumor PD-L1 expression was defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per validated Dako PD-L1 IHC assay
Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
- dispersion Type
- 95% Confidence Interval
- groups
- description
- Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) who are platinum naive or have recurred 6 months or more after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W
- id
- OG000
- title
- Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup
- description
- Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) who are platinum naive or have recurred 6 months or more after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab-Placebo Q6W
- id
- OG001
- title
- Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup
- param Type
- MEDIAN
- population Description
- Platinum eligible subgroup
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- From randomization to disease progression or death. Approximately 63 Months
- title
- Progression Free Survival (PFS) - Platinum Eligible Subgroup Based on PD-L1 Status
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Months
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice