NCT02823574 · OUTCOME
ORR - Platinum Eligible Subgroup Based on PD-L1 Expression
Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Placebo in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck · Source last updated 2023-05-03
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- NUMBER
- Unit
- percentage of participants
- Interval / dispersion
- 95% Confidence Interval
- Time frame
- From randomization to end of study. Approximately 63 Months
What was measured
ORR is defined as the best overall response (BOR) of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the number of randomized participants for each treatment group.
Tumor PD-L1 expression was defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per validated Dako PD-L1 IHC assay Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes(whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.
Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Analysis population: Platinum Eligible Subgroup
Groups in this outcome
Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup
Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) who are platinum naive or have recurred 6 months or more after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W
Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup
Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) who are platinum naive or have recurred 6 months or more after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab-Placebo Q6W
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 123 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 61 |
|---|
Reported measurements
<1%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 51 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 23 |
|---|
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 15.7 | Not reported | 7.0 | 28.6 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 21.7 | Not reported | 7.5 | 43.7 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: ≥ 1%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 65 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 33 |
|---|
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 21.5 | Not reported | 12.3 | 33.5 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 30.3 | Not reported | 15.6 | 48.7 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: < 25%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 87 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 37 |
|---|
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 14.9 | Not reported | 8.2 | 24.2 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 24.3 | Not reported | 11.8 | 41.2 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: ≥ 25%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 29 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 19 |
|---|
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 31.0 | Not reported | 15.3 | 50.8 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 31.6 | Not reported | 12.6 | 56.6 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: <50%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 96 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 41 |
|---|
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 16.7 | Not reported | 9.8 | 25.6 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 24.4 | Not reported | 12.4 | 40.3 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: > 50%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 20 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 15 |
|---|
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 30.0 | Not reported | 11.9 | 54.3 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 33.3 | Not reported | 11.8 | 61.6 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: 1 - < 25%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 36 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 14 |
|---|
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 13.9 | Not reported | 4.7 | 29.5 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 28.6 | Not reported | 8.4 | 58.1 | Not reported |
|---|
Without quantifiable PD-L1 expression at baseline
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 7 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | 5 |
|---|
Values in percentage of participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | NA | Not reported | NA | NA | Not reported when sample size is less than 10 subjects for the subgroup category,CI not calculable |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup | NA | Not reported | NA | NA | Not reported when sample size is less than 10 subjects for the subgroup category, CI not calculable |
|---|
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 7.0
- upper Limit
- 28.6
- value
- 15.7
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 7.5
- upper Limit
- 43.7
- value
- 21.7
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 51
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 23
- units
- Participants
- title
- <1%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 12.3
- upper Limit
- 33.5
- value
- 21.5
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 15.6
- upper Limit
- 48.7
- value
- 30.3
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 65
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 33
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: ≥ 1%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 8.2
- upper Limit
- 24.2
- value
- 14.9
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 11.8
- upper Limit
- 41.2
- value
- 24.3
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 87
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 37
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: < 25%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 15.3
- upper Limit
- 50.8
- value
- 31.0
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 12.6
- upper Limit
- 56.6
- value
- 31.6
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 29
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 19
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: ≥ 25%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 9.8
- upper Limit
- 25.6
- value
- 16.7
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 12.4
- upper Limit
- 40.3
- value
- 24.4
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 96
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 41
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: <50%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 11.9
- upper Limit
- 54.3
- value
- 30.0
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 11.8
- upper Limit
- 61.6
- value
- 33.3
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 20
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 15
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: > 50%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 4.7
- upper Limit
- 29.5
- value
- 13.9
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 8.4
- upper Limit
- 58.1
- value
- 28.6
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 36
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 14
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: 1 - < 25%
- categories
- measurements
- comment
- Not reported when sample size is less than 10 subjects for the subgroup category,CI not calculable
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- NA
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- NA
- comment
- Not reported when sample size is less than 10 subjects for the subgroup category, CI not calculable
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- NA
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- NA
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 7
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 5
- units
- Participants
- title
- Without quantifiable PD-L1 expression at baseline
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 123
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 61
- units
- Participants
- description
- ORR is defined as the best overall response (BOR) of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the number of randomized participants for each treatment group.
Tumor PD-L1 expression was defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per validated Dako PD-L1 IHC assay Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes(whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.
Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
- dispersion Type
- 95% Confidence Interval
- groups
- description
- Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) who are platinum naive or have recurred 6 months or more after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W
- id
- OG000
- title
- Treatment A - Platinum Eligible Subgroup
- description
- Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) who are platinum naive or have recurred 6 months or more after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab-Placebo Q6W
- id
- OG001
- title
- Treatment B - Platinum Eligible Subgroup
- param Type
- NUMBER
- population Description
- Platinum Eligible Subgroup
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- From randomization to end of study. Approximately 63 Months
- title
- ORR - Platinum Eligible Subgroup Based on PD-L1 Expression
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- percentage of participants
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice