NCT02823574 · OUTCOME
ORR - Platinum Refractory Subgroup Based on PD-L1 Expression
Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Placebo in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck · Source last updated 2023-05-03
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- NUMBER
- Unit
- Percentage of Participants
- Interval / dispersion
- 95% Confidence Interval
- Time frame
- From randomization to end of study. Approximately 63 Months
What was measured
ORR is defined as the best overall response (BOR) of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the number of randomized participants for each treatment group.
Tumor PD-L1 expression was defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per validated Dako PD-L1 IHC assay
Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes(whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.
Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Analysis population: Platinum Refractory subgroup
Groups in this outcome
Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup
Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) that has recurred during or less than 6 months after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W
Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup
Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) that has recurred during or less than 6 months after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab-Placebo Q6W
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 159 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 82 |
|---|
Reported measurements
<1%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 52 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 31 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of Participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 7.7 | Not reported | 2.1 | 18.5 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 25.8 | Not reported | 11.9 | 44.6 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: ≥ 1%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 92 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 46 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of Participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 19.6 | Not reported | 12.0 | 29.1 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 19.6 | Not reported | 9.4 | 33.9 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: < 25%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 117 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 57 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of Participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 11.1 | Not reported | 6.1 | 18.3 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 21.1 | Not reported | 11.4 | 33.9 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: ≥ 25%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 27 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 20 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of Participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 33.3 | Not reported | 16.5 | 54.0 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 25.0 | Not reported | 8.7 | 49.1 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: <50%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 129 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 66 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of Participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 13.2 | Not reported | 7.9 | 20.3 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 22.7 | Not reported | 13.3 | 34.7 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: > 50%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 15 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 11 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of Participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 33.3 | Not reported | 11.8 | 61.6 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 18.2 | Not reported | 2.3 | 51.8 | Not reported |
|---|
PD-L1: 1 - < 25%
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 65 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 26 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of Participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 13.8 | Not reported | 6.5 | 24.7 | Not reported |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 15.4 | Not reported | 4.4 | 34.9 | Not reported |
|---|
without quantifiable PD-L1 expression at baseline
Analysis denominator · Participants
| Group | Source count |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 15 |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | 5 |
|---|
Values in Percentage of Participants · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|
| Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | NA | Not reported | NA | NA | Not reported when sample size is less than 10 subjects for the subgroup category |
|---|
| Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup | NA | Not reported | NA | NA | Not reported when sample size is less than 10 subjects for the subgroup category |
|---|
Complete source fields
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 2.1
- upper Limit
- 18.5
- value
- 7.7
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 11.9
- upper Limit
- 44.6
- value
- 25.8
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 52
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 31
- units
- Participants
- title
- <1%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 12.0
- upper Limit
- 29.1
- value
- 19.6
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 9.4
- upper Limit
- 33.9
- value
- 19.6
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 92
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 46
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: ≥ 1%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 6.1
- upper Limit
- 18.3
- value
- 11.1
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 11.4
- upper Limit
- 33.9
- value
- 21.1
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 117
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 57
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: < 25%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 16.5
- upper Limit
- 54.0
- value
- 33.3
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 8.7
- upper Limit
- 49.1
- value
- 25.0
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 27
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 20
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: ≥ 25%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 7.9
- upper Limit
- 20.3
- value
- 13.2
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 13.3
- upper Limit
- 34.7
- value
- 22.7
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 129
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 66
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: <50%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 11.8
- upper Limit
- 61.6
- value
- 33.3
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 2.3
- upper Limit
- 51.8
- value
- 18.2
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 15
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 11
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: > 50%
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 6.5
- upper Limit
- 24.7
- value
- 13.8
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 4.4
- upper Limit
- 34.9
- value
- 15.4
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 65
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 26
- units
- Participants
- title
- PD-L1: 1 - < 25%
- categories
- measurements
- comment
- Not reported when sample size is less than 10 subjects for the subgroup category
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- NA
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- NA
- comment
- Not reported when sample size is less than 10 subjects for the subgroup category
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- NA
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- NA
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 15
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 5
- units
- Participants
- title
- without quantifiable PD-L1 expression at baseline
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 159
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 82
- units
- Participants
- description
- ORR is defined as the best overall response (BOR) of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the number of randomized participants for each treatment group.
Tumor PD-L1 expression was defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per validated Dako PD-L1 IHC assay
Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes(whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.
Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
- dispersion Type
- 95% Confidence Interval
- groups
- description
- Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) that has recurred during or less than 6 months after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W
- id
- OG000
- title
- Treatment A - Platinum Refractory Subgroup
- description
- Participants with histologically confirmed Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) that has recurred during or less than 6 months after completion of previous platinum-based chemotherapy.
Treated with Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + Ipilimumab-Placebo Q6W
- id
- OG001
- title
- Treatment B - Platinum Refractory Subgroup
- param Type
- NUMBER
- population Description
- Platinum Refractory subgroup
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- From randomization to end of study. Approximately 63 Months
- title
- ORR - Platinum Refractory Subgroup Based on PD-L1 Expression
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Percentage of Participants
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice