TriangleNCT02811861 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS
Lenvatinib/Everolimus or Lenvatinib/Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib Alone as Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.
- Phase
- PHASE3
- Status at capture
- ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING
- Registry last update
- 2026-02-23
The primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate that lenvatinib in combination with everolimus (Arm A) or pembrolizumab (Arm B) is superior compared to sunitinib alone (Arm C) in improving progression-free survival (PFS) (by independent imaging review \[IIR\] using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST 1.1\]) as first-line treatment in participants with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record
What did the study report?
Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.
Participant flow
Baseline characteristics
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Imaging Review (IIR)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Overall Survival (OS)
Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Toxicity
Time to Treatment Failure Due to Toxicity
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Syndrome Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Scores
HRQoL Assessed by European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) Score
HRQoL Assessed by European Quality of Life (EuroQol) Five-Dimensional, 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Score
PFS on Next-line of Therapy (PFS2)
PFS by Investigator Assessment
Model-predicted Clearance for Lenvatinib and Everolimus
Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lenvatinib and Everolimus
Adverse events
Limitations, agreements, and source contact
Who could take part
- eligibility Criteria
- Inclusion Criteria: 1. Histological or cytological confirmation of RCC with a clear-cell component (original tissue diagnosis of RCC is acceptable). 2. Documented evidence of advanced RCC. 3. At least 1 measurable target lesion according to RECIST 1.1 meeting the following criteria: * Lymph node (LN) lesion that measures at least 1 dimension as greater than or equal to (\>=) 1.5 cm in the short axis * Lymph node (LN) lesion that measures at least 1 dimension as greater than or equal to (\>=) 1.5 centimeter (cm) in the short axis * Non-nodal lesion that measures greater than or equal to (\>=) 1.0 cm in the longest diameter * The lesion is suitable for repeat measurement using computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Lesions that have had external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or locoregional therapy must show radiographic evidence of disease progression based on RECIST 1.1 to be deemed a target lesion. 3.Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of \>=70 4.Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with or without antihypertensive medications, defined as BP less than or equal (\<=) 150/90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) at Screening and no change in antihypertensive medications within 1 week prior to Cycle 1/Day 1 (C1/D1) 5.Adequate renal function defined as creatinine \<=1.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN); or for participants with creatinine greater than (\>) 1.5\*ULN, the calculated creatinine clearance \>=30 milliliters per minute (mL/min) (per the Cockcroft-Gault formula) is acceptable. 6.Adequate bone marrow function defined by: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>=1500/cubic millimeter (mm\^3) * Platelets \>=100,000/mm\^3 * Hemoglobin \>=9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) NOTE: Criteria must be met without erythropoietin dependency and without packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion within the previous 2 weeks. 7.Adequate blood coagulation function defined by International Normalized ratio (INR) \<=1.5 unless participant is receiving anticoagulant therapy, as long as INR is within therapeutic range of intended use of anticoagulants. 8.Adequate liver function defined by: * Total bilirubin \<=1.5\*ULN except for unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia of Gilbert's syndrome. * Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<=3\*ULN (in the case of liver metastases \<=5\*ULN), unless there are bone metastases. Participants with ALP values \>3\*ULN and known to have bone metastases can be included. 9.Provide written informed consent. 10.Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Participants who have received any systemic anticancer therapy for RCC, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, or any systemic investigational anticancer agent. Prior adjuvant treatment with an investigational anticancer agent is not allowed unless the investigator can provide evidence of participant's randomization to placebo arm. 2. Participants with central nervous system (CNS) metastases are not eligible, unless they have completed local therapy (example, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgery or radiosurgery) and have discontinued the use of corticosteroids for this indication for at least 4 weeks before starting treatment in this study. Any signs (example, radiologic) or symptoms of CNS metastases must be stable for at least 4 weeks before starting study treatment 3. Active malignancy (except for RCC, definitively treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, and carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or bladder) within the past 24 months. Participants with history of localized \& low risk prostate cancer are allowed in the study if they were treated with curative intent and there is no prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence within the past 5 years 4. Prior radiation therapy within 21 days prior to start of study treatment with the exception of palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions, which is allowed if completed 2 weeks prior to study treatment start 5. Participants who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs \<=4 weeks prior to study treatment start. 6. Received a live vaccine within 30 days of planned start of study treatment (Cycle 1/Day 1). Examples of live vaccines include, but are not limited to, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella/zoster (chicken pox), yellow fever, rabies, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and typhoid vaccine. Seasonal influenza vaccines for injection are generally killed virus vaccines and are allowed; however, intranasal influenza vaccines (example, FluMist®) are live attenuated vaccines and are not allowed. 7. Participants with proteinuria \>1+ on urine dipstick testing will undergo 24-h urine collection for quantitative assessment of proteinuria. Participants with urine protein \>=1 g/24 h will be ineligible 8. Fasting total cholesterol \>300 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (or ˃7.75 millimole per liter (mmol/L)) and/or fasting triglycerides level ˃2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN). Note: these participants can be included after initiation or adjustment of lipid-lowering medication 9. Uncontrolled diabetes as defined by fasting glucose \>1.5 times the ULN. Note: these participants can be included after initiation or adjustment of glucose-lowering medication 10. Prolongation of corrected QT (QTc) interval to \>480 milliseconds (ms) 11. Participants who have not recovered adequately from any toxicity and/or complications from major surgery prior to starting therapy. 12. Gastrointestinal malabsorption, gastrointestinal anastomosis, or any other condition that might affect the absorption of lenvatinib, everolimus, and/or sunitinib. 13. Bleeding or thrombotic disorders or participants at risk for severe hemorrhage. The degree of tumor invasion/infiltration of major blood vessels should be considered because of the potential risk of severe hemorrhage associated with tumor shrinkage/necrosis following lenvatinib therapy 14. Clinically significant hemoptysis or tumor bleeding within 2 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug 15. Significant cardiovascular impairment within 12 months of the first dose of study drug: history of congestive heart failure greater than New York Heart Association Class II, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or cardiac arrhythmia associated with hemodynamic instability. The following is also excluded: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below the institutional normal range as determined by multiple-gated acquisition MUGA scan or echocardiogram 16. Active infection (any infection requiring systemic treatment) 17. Participants known to be positive for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). 18. Known active Hepatitis B (example, Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) reactive) or Hepatitis C (example, hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) \[qualitative\] is detected) 19. Known history of, or any evidence of, interstitial lung disease 20. Has a history of (non-infectious) pneumonitis that required steroids, or current pneumonitis 21. Participants with a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or who are receiving chronic systemic steroid therapy (doses exceeding 10 mg/day of prednisone equivalent) or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the first dose of study treatment. Physiologic doses of corticosteroids (up to 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) may be used during the study 22. Active autoimmune disease (with the exception of psoriasis) that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years (that is, with use of disease modifying agents, corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs). Replacement therapy (example, thyroxine, insulin, or physiologic corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal or pituitary insufficiency) is not considered a form of systemic treatment. 23. Females who are breastfeeding or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin \[ß-hCG\] (or human chorionic gonadotropin \[hCG\]) test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 IU/L or equivalent units of ß-hCG \[or hCG\]). A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug. 24. Females of childbearing potential who: * Do not agree to use a highly effective method of contraception for the entire study period and for 120 days after study discontinuation, that is: * total abstinence (if it is their preferred and usual lifestyle) * an intrauterine device (IUD) or hormone-releasing system (IUS) * a contraceptive implant * an oral contraceptive (with additional barrier method) OR * Do not have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia. For sites outside of the EU, it is permissible that if a highly effective method of contraception is not appropriate or acceptable to the participant, then the participant must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception, that is, double barrier methods of contraception such as condom plus diaphragm or cervical/vault cap with spermicide. 25. Males who have not had a successful vasectomy (confirmed azoospermia) and do not agree to use condom + spermicide OR have a female partner who does not meet the criteria above (that is, is of childbearing potential and not practicing highly effective contraception throughout the study period), starting with the first dose of study therapy through 120 days after the last dose of study therapy, unless sexually abstinent. Note: Abstinence is acceptable if this is the usual lifestyle and preferred contraception for the participant. 26. Known intolerance to any of the study drugs (or any of the excipients) 27. Participant has had an allogenic tissue/solid organ transplant.
- healthy Volunteers
- false
- minimum Age
- 18 Years
- sex
- ALL
- std Ages
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
- arm Groups
- description
- Lenvatinib 18 milligrams (mg) administered orally, once daily, plus everolimus 5 mg administered orally, once daily in each 21-day cycle.
- intervention Names
- Drug: Lenvatinib
- Drug: Everolimus
- label
- Lenvatinib 18 mg plus Everolimus 5 mg
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- description
- Lenvatinib 20 mg administered orally, once daily, in each 21-day cycle plus pembrolizumab 200 mg administered intravenously (IV), every 3 weeks on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
- intervention Names
- Drug: Lenvatinib
- Drug: Pembrolizumab
- label
- Lenvatinib 20 mg plus Pembrolizumab 200 mg
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- description
- Sunitinib 50 mg administered orally, once daily, on a schedule of 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment in each 21-day cycle.
- intervention Names
- Drug: Sunitinib
- label
- Sunitinib 50 mg
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- interventions
- arm Group Labels
- Lenvatinib 18 mg plus Everolimus 5 mg
- Lenvatinib 20 mg plus Pembrolizumab 200 mg
- name
- Lenvatinib
- type
- DRUG
- arm Group Labels
- Lenvatinib 18 mg plus Everolimus 5 mg
- name
- Everolimus
- type
- DRUG
- arm Group Labels
- Lenvatinib 20 mg plus Pembrolizumab 200 mg
- name
- Pembrolizumab
- type
- DRUG
- arm Group Labels
- Sunitinib 50 mg
- name
- Sunitinib
- type
- DRUG
Study design
- allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- masking Info
- masking
- NONE
- primary Purpose
- TREATMENT
Enrollment
- count
- 1069
- type
- ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
- primary Outcomes
- description
- PFS assessed by IIR was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death (whichever occurred first) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase or 5 millimeter (mm) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.
- measure
- Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Imaging Review (IIR)
- time Frame
- From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first or up to data cutoff date 28 Aug 2020 (up to approximately 46 months)
- secondary Outcomes
- description
- ORR is defined as the proportion of participants who had best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by IIR using RECIST 1.1. CR is defined as disappearance of all (targeted and non-target \[NT\]) lesions. All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (\<) 10mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. To be considered a BOR, all responses had to be confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the initial assessment of response. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
- measure
- Objective Response Rate (ORR)
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 69 months
- description
- OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants who were lost to follow-up and those who were alive at the data cutoff date were censored, either at the last date the participant was last known alive or at the data cutoff date, whichever occurred first. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
- measure
- Overall Survival (OS)
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 69 months
- description
- TEAEs were defined as those adverse events (AEs) that occurred (or worsened, if present at Baseline) after the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug.An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered an investigational product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with medicinal product. A SAE was defined as any AE if it resulted in death or life-threatening AE or required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or resulted in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
- measure
- Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 69 months
- description
- Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026.
- measure
- Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Toxicity
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 69 months
- description
- Time to treatment failure due to toxicity is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date that a participant discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
- measure
- Time to Treatment Failure Due to Toxicity
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 69 months
- description
- The FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 items that experts and participants had indicated are important targets for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer, and that clinical experts had indicated are primarily disease-related, as opposed to treatment-related. Symptoms assessed on the FKSI-DRS included lack of energy, fatigue, weight loss, pain, bone pain, shortness of breath, cough, fever, or hematuria. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much) where total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 36 (best), where higher scores correspond to better outcomes. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
- measure
- Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Syndrome Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Scores
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 69 months
- description
- EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire including 30 questions that rate the overall quality of life in cancer participants. The first 28 questions use a 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) for evaluating function (physical, role, social, cognitive, emotional), symptoms (diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, nausea/vomiting, constipation, and pain) and financial difficulties. The last 2 questions use a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent) to evaluate overall health and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using a standard EORTC algorithm. For the overall HRQoL and functioning scales, a higher score is correlated with better HRQoL, whereas a higher score represents worse HRQoL for symptom scales. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026)
- measure
- HRQoL Assessed by European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) Score
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 69 months
- description
- EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire consisting of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). For the EQ-5D, participants rate 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) at 1 of 3 levels (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The EQ-5D Health Utilities Index (HUI) is derived from the five dimensions of the EQ-5D, using country-specific preference weights (tariffs) to summarize how good or bad each health state is on a scale from 1 (full health) to \<0 (worse health/dead). The EQ-VAS measures self-rated global health status using a vertically oriented VAS, where 100 represents the "best imaginable health state" and 0 represents the "worst imaginable health state." Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026)
- measure
- HRQoL Assessed by European Quality of Life (EuroQol) Five-Dimensional, 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Score
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 69 months
- description
- PFS2 is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression as assessed by investigator on next-line treatment or death from any cause (whichever occurred first). Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026)
- measure
- PFS on Next-line of Therapy (PFS2)
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 69 months
- description
- PFS by investigator assessment is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression based on the investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1 or death (whichever occurred first). Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026).
- measure
- PFS by Investigator Assessment
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 69 months
- description
- Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026)
- measure
- Model-predicted Clearance for Lenvatinib and Everolimus
- time Frame
- Cycles 1 and 2 Day 1; 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours postdose; Cycle 1 Day 15: predose and 2-12 hours postdose; Cycles 3, 4, 5 and 6 Day 1: predose (Cycle length=21 days)
- description
- Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2026)
- measure
- Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lenvatinib and Everolimus
- time Frame
- Cycles 1 and 2 Day 1; 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours postdose; Cycle 1 Day 15: predose and 2-12 hours postdose; Cycles 3, 4, 5 and 6 Day 1: predose (Cycle length = 21 days
Full study description
- brief Summary
- The primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate that lenvatinib in combination with everolimus (Arm A) or pembrolizumab (Arm B) is superior compared to sunitinib alone (Arm C) in improving progression-free survival (PFS) (by independent imaging review \[IIR\] using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST 1.1\]) as first-line treatment in participants with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Source references
- references
- citation
- Fawsitt CG, Pan J, Orishaba P, Jackson CH, Thom H. Unanchored simulated treatment comparison on survival outcomes using parametric and Royston-Parmar models with application to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in renal cell carcinoma. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02480-x.
- pmid
- 39885377
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Grunwald V, McKay RR, Buchler T, Eto M, Park SH, Takagi T, Zanetta S, Keizman D, Suarez C, Negrier S, Lee JL, Santini D, Bedke J, Staehler M, Kollmannsberger C, Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ, Burgents JE, Xie R, Okpara CE, Powles T. Clinical outcomes by baseline metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib: Post hoc analysis of the CLEAR trial. Int J Cancer. 2025 Apr 1;156(7):1326-1335. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35288. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
- pmid
- 39739622
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Zheng H, Zhou J, Tong Y, Zhang J. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Feb;23(1):102264. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102264. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
- pmid
- 39642774
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Motzer RJ, Choueiri TK, Hutson T, Young Rha S, Puente J, Lalani AA, Winquist E, Eto M, Basappa NS, Tannir NM, Vaishampayan U, Bjarnason GA, Oudard S, Grunwald V, Burgents J, Xie R, McKenzie J, Powles T. Characterization of Responses to Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma at the Final Prespecified Survival Analysis of the Phase 3 CLEAR Study. Eur Urol. 2024 Jul;86(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.015. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
- pmid
- 38582713
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Motzer RJ, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, Grunwald V, Hutson TE, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Merchan J, Goh JC, Lalani AA, De Giorgi U, Melichar B, Hong SH, Gurney H, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Kopyltsov E, Tjulandin S, Gordoa TA, Kozlov V, Alyasova A, Winquist E, Maroto P, Kim M, Peer A, Procopio G, Takagi T, Wong S, Bedke J, Schmidinger M, Rodriguez-Lopez K, Burgents J, He C, Okpara CE, McKenzie J, Choueiri TK; CLEAR Trial Investigators. Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Prespecified Overall Survival Analysis of CLEAR, a Phase III Study. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Apr 10;42(11):1222-1228. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01569. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
- pmid
- 38227898
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Grunwald V, Powles T, Eto M, Kopyltsov E, Rha SY, Porta C, Motzer R, Hutson TE, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Hong SH, Winquist E, Goh JC, Maroto P, Buchler T, Takagi T, Burgents JE, Perini R, He C, Okpara CE, McKenzie J, Choueiri TK. Phase 3 CLEAR study in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: outcomes in subgroups for the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and sunitinib arms. Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 16;13:1223282. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1223282. eCollection 2023.
- pmid
- 37664025
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Rha SY, Choueiri TK, Matveev VB, Alyasova A, Hong SH, Gordoa TA, Gurney H, Bjarnason GA, Buchler T, Pedrazzoli P, Takagi T, Park SH, Lee JL, Perini RF, He CS, McKenzie JA, Eto M. Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs sunitinib in the East Asian subset of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma from the CLEAR trial. Int J Cancer. 2023 Sep 15;153(6):1241-1250. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34608. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
- pmid
- 37294085
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Aldin A, Besiroglu B, Adams A, Monsef I, Piechotta V, Tomlinson E, Hornbach C, Dressen N, Goldkuhle M, Maisch P, Dahm P, Heidenreich A, Skoetz N. First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013798.pub2.
- pmid
- 37146227
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Motzer R, George S, Merchan JR, Hutson TE, Song X, Perini RF, Xie R, Bapat U, Puente J. Characterization and Management of Adverse Reactions From the CLEAR Study in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab. Oncologist. 2023 Jun 2;28(6):501-509. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac269.
- pmid
- 36866412
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Choueiri TK, Eto M, Motzer R, De Giorgi U, Buchler T, Basappa NS, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Tjulandin S, Hoon Park S, Melichar B, Hutson T, Alemany C, McGregor B, Powles T, Grunwald V, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Kopyltsov E, Kapoor A, Alonso Gordoa T, Goh JC, Staehler M, Merchan JR, Xie R, Perini RF, Mody K, McKenzie J, Porta CG. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (CLEAR): extended follow-up from the phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):228-238. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00049-9.
- pmid
- 36858721
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Motzer R, Porta C, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Choueiri TK, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Hong SH, Kapoor A, Goh JC, Eto M, Bennett L, Wang J, Pan JJ, Saretsky TL, Perini RF, He CS, Mody K, Cella D. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus versus sunitinib (CLEAR): a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jun;23(6):768-780. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00212-1. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
- pmid
- 35489363
- type
- DERIVED
- citation
- Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, Grunwald V, Hutson TE, Kopyltsov E, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Kozlov V, Alyasova A, Hong SH, Kapoor A, Alonso Gordoa T, Merchan JR, Winquist E, Maroto P, Goh JC, Kim M, Gurney H, Patel V, Peer A, Procopio G, Takagi T, Melichar B, Rolland F, De Giorgi U, Wong S, Bedke J, Schmidinger M, Dutcus CE, Smith AD, Dutta L, Mody K, Perini RF, Xing D, Choueiri TK; CLEAR Trial Investigators. Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1289-1300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035716. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
- pmid
- 33616314
- type
- DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
Discovery and provenance
- release id
- ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
- edge id
- nct-edge-0a76c4c910c8eff5411b
- requested nct id
- NCT02811861
- primary nct id
- NCT02811861
- source kind
- fda_spl_label
- source record id
- 228e1e3f-d207-481f-8e14-9fdcbd0470e9
- source file sha256
- fc39a8c5cf96bf95ca20b85578140167b66b2741f7d9217f500d9ba0847ac058
- payload sha256
- 0d219dd01efdf26b20e32d872cc94f9b0bf5c2eef5113cfbca48620141543801
- payload
- application numbers
- BLA125514
- clinical indication matching status
- not_inferred
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-0a76c4c910c8eff5411b
- link basis
- explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
- nct id
- NCT02811861
- occurrences
- context exact
- 0.81), respectively. First-line treatment with lenvatinib KEYNOTE-581 The efficacy of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib was investigated in KEYNOTE-581 (NCT02811861), a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial conducted in 1069 patients with advanced RCC in the first-line setting. Patients were enrolled regardless of PD-L
- end
- 160479
- exact text
- NCT02811861
- start
- 160468
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- source file
- /tmp/cancer-full-research/indications/raw/labels-00100.json
- source file sha256
- fc39a8c5cf96bf95ca20b85578140167b66b2741f7d9217f500d9ba0847ac058
- source json pointer
- /results/20/clinical_studies/0
- source kind
- fda_spl_label
- source record id
- 228e1e3f-d207-481f-8e14-9fdcbd0470e9
- source string basis
- parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
- source string sha256
- 8363db34593bf3be5a99cd9f3132c716fc77e783f32263bb73a3910d5da525da
- spl effective time
- 20260710
- spl set id
- 9333c79b-d487-4538-a9f0-71b91a02b287
- release id
- ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
- edge id
- nct-edge-25e8cc49eb6e3ad6c722
- requested nct id
- NCT02811861
- primary nct id
- NCT02811861
- source kind
- nci_explicit_reference_or_link
- source record id
- Source null
- source file sha256
- 1f3a60c8c3de7fa1d487ba1b77058d98fb5f43d894314870b86ed48ec1e2ee61
- payload sha256
- 579de616ce5dc97147118263b503c4d285b91774827aa1be2878e7d2fd2921d4
- payload
- clinical indication matching status
- not_inferred
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-25e8cc49eb6e3ad6c722
- link basis
- explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
- nct id
- NCT02811861
- occurrences
- context exact
- plus lenvatinib):</p> <div class="pdq-content-list"><ol id="_644"><li> An open-label, phase III, randomized controlled trial (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT02811861">NCT02811861</a>) compared sunitinib with either lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or lenvatinib plus everolimus. The study enrolled 1,609 patients who had receive
- end
- 99989
- exact text
- NCT02811861
- start
- 99978
- context exact
- nib):</p> <div class="pdq-content-list"><ol id="_644"><li> An open-label, phase III, randomized controlled trial (<a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT02811861">NCT02811861</a>) compared sunitinib with either lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or lenvatinib plus everolimus. The study enrolled 1,609 patients who had received no previous
- end
- 100002
- exact text
- NCT02811861
- start
- 99991
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- source file
- /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/4b032ee13ec68d6105.html
- source file sha256
- 1f3a60c8c3de7fa1d487ba1b77058d98fb5f43d894314870b86ed48ec1e2ee61
- source json pointer
- Source null
- source kind
- nci_explicit_reference_or_link
- source record id
- Source null
- source retrieved at
- 2026-09-09T23:21:50.909484+00:00
- source string basis
- UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
- source string sha256
- 0166037cd1d0239345071d51a8ce6e03e41ba5c68717b24b550be4043d37cae6
- source title
- Renal Cell Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
- source update dates
- context
- Updated: May 13, 2025
- datetime
- 2025-05-13T12:00:00Z
- display
- May 13, 2025
- release id
- ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
- edge id
- nct-edge-b0f9af635b924e897755
- requested nct id
- NCT02811861
- primary nct id
- NCT02811861
- source kind
- fda_spl_label
- source record id
- 18b3adae-863b-413b-8e36-e3551115db37
- source file sha256
- 0dba7a040bbbf460aa9f482c5b67c9f28f75fc9df775ee1e7b345b758f780e07
- payload sha256
- d8fda5061f6bfc4a69eb66d8626844426586330dc88ac601657104fb614f39ff
- payload
- application numbers
- BLA761467
- clinical indication matching status
- not_inferred
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-b0f9af635b924e897755
- link basis
- explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
- nct id
- NCT02811861
- occurrences
- context exact
- ely. First-line treatment with lenvatinib KEYNOTE-581 The efficacy of intravenous pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib was investigated in KEYNOTE-581 (NCT02811861), a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial conducted in 1069 patients with advanced RCC in the first-line setting. Patients were enrolled regardless of PD-L
- end
- 164038
- exact text
- NCT02811861
- start
- 164027
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- source file
- /tmp/cancer-full-research/indications/raw/labels-00000.json
- source file sha256
- 0dba7a040bbbf460aa9f482c5b67c9f28f75fc9df775ee1e7b345b758f780e07
- source json pointer
- /results/81/clinical_studies/0
- source kind
- fda_spl_label
- source record id
- 18b3adae-863b-413b-8e36-e3551115db37
- source string basis
- parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
- source string sha256
- 9c547e9936511c9115c8e36525a1065e37cd70a0d759724df54569e0a3ff0ac8
- spl effective time
- 20260731
- spl set id
- 097d166f-b73b-41d3-9b37-7653cd2a0c41
- release id
- ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
- edge id
- nct-edge-c142e8eede0baa1e5299
- requested nct id
- NCT02811861
- primary nct id
- NCT02811861
- source kind
- fda_spl_label
- source record id
- e2339aa3-c753-4269-9c59-1d6528a00f0c
- source file sha256
- 24c521d95bd19e54a354ae592997052a3a1b19254da1496b3a98a5e9bac4ed08
- payload sha256
- d45ce36e2f42f288297153f280708887bbe8e639114bd7f0f3fc06e25630a03d
- payload
- application numbers
- NDA206947
- clinical indication matching status
- not_inferred
- end exclusive
- true
- id
- nct-edge-c142e8eede0baa1e5299
- link basis
- explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
- nct id
- NCT02811861
- occurrences
- context exact
- T reatment of P atients with RCC in C ombination with Pembrolizumab CLEAR The efficacy of LENVIMA in combination with pembrolizumab was investigated in CLEAR (NCT02811861), a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial that enrolled 1069 patients with advanced RCC in the first-line setting. Patients were enrolled regardless of PD-
- end
- 4742
- exact text
- NCT02811861
- start
- 4731
- offset unit
- unicode_code_points
- source file
- /tmp/cancer-full-research/indications/raw/labels-00700.json
- source file sha256
- 24c521d95bd19e54a354ae592997052a3a1b19254da1496b3a98a5e9bac4ed08
- source json pointer
- /results/47/clinical_studies/0
- source kind
- fda_spl_label
- source record id
- e2339aa3-c753-4269-9c59-1d6528a00f0c
- source string basis
- parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
- source string sha256
- d501fa0f9dca778737cacc8a0261e6e35057b46e8a8be38ebd95df76b61c00d9
- spl effective time
- 20260630
- spl set id
- f4bedd21-efde-44c6-9d9c-b48b78d7ed1e
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice