NCT02807636 · OUTCOME
Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status as Measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 Score in the Placebo+Gemcitabine+Carboplatin/Cisplatin Arm Versus Atezolizumab Monotherapy Arm
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEDIAN
- Unit
- Months
- Interval / dispersion
- 95% Confidence Interval
- Time frame
- Up to approximately 73 months
What was measured
Time to deterioration in global health status as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 in the Placebo+Chemo Arm versus Atezolizumab Monotherapy Arm.
Analysis population: Evaluable population defined as patients in ITT for comparisons of Placebo+Chemo vs. Atezo Mono who have a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. ITT for comparison of Atezo Mono vs. Placebo+Chemo consisted of 360 patients enrolled in Atezo Mono in Stage 2. Although a total of 400 patients were randomized to Placebo+Chemo throughout study, only 359 patients who were concurrently enrolled into this arm in Stage 2 and prior to Protocol v6 were included in Placebo+Chemo of this ITT.
Groups in this outcome
Placebo+Gemcitabine+Carboplatin/Cisplatin
Participants received blinded placebo matched to atezolizumab in combination with open-label platinum-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine with either cisplatin or carboplatin).
Atezolizumab Monotherapy
Eligible participants received open-label atezolizumab as monotherapy.
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Placebo+Gemcitabine+Carboplatin/Cisplatin | 359 |
| Atezolizumab Monotherapy | 360 |
Reported measurements
Source class 1
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo+Gemcitabine+Carboplatin/Cisplatin | 12.02 | Not reported | 8.08 | 20.24 | Not reported |
| Atezolizumab Monotherapy | 23.20 | Not reported | 8.31 | NA | Not evaluable due to sample size is very small and not enough events at later times to estimate the upper bound of the CI. |
Source statistical analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.74
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 1.19
- group Description
- Strata are: PD-L1 Status, BAJORIN Risk Factor Score and Stratum 4 for all participants.
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.6139
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.94
- statistical Method
- Log Rank
Complete source fields
- analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.74
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 1.19
- group Description
- Strata are: PD-L1 Status, BAJORIN Risk Factor Score and Stratum 4 for all participants.
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG001
- non Inferiority Type
- SUPERIORITY
- p Value
- 0.6139
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 0.94
- statistical Method
- Log Rank
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- 8.08
- upper Limit
- 20.24
- value
- 12.02
- comment
- Not evaluable due to sample size is very small and not enough events at later times to estimate the upper bound of the CI.
- group Id
- OG001
- lower Limit
- 8.31
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- 23.20
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 359
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 360
- units
- Participants
- description
- Time to deterioration in global health status as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 in the Placebo+Chemo Arm versus Atezolizumab Monotherapy Arm.
- dispersion Type
- 95% Confidence Interval
- groups
- description
- Participants received blinded placebo matched to atezolizumab in combination with open-label platinum-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine with either cisplatin or carboplatin).
- id
- OG000
- title
- Placebo+Gemcitabine+Carboplatin/Cisplatin
- description
- Eligible participants received open-label atezolizumab as monotherapy.
- id
- OG001
- title
- Atezolizumab Monotherapy
- param Type
- MEDIAN
- population Description
- Evaluable population defined as patients in ITT for comparisons of Placebo+Chemo vs. Atezo Mono who have a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. ITT for comparison of Atezo Mono vs. Placebo+Chemo consisted of 360 patients enrolled in Atezo Mono in Stage 2. Although a total of 400 patients were randomized to Placebo+Chemo throughout study, only 359 patients who were concurrently enrolled into this arm in Stage 2 and prior to Protocol v6 were included in Placebo+Chemo of this ITT.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Up to approximately 73 months
- title
- Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status as Measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 Score in the Placebo+Gemcitabine+Carboplatin/Cisplatin Arm Versus Atezolizumab Monotherapy Arm
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Months
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle