Skip to content
← Study library

NCT02737553 · REGISTRY CONDITION SEARCH

Laparoscopic Enclosed Morcellation; Electromechanic Morcellation vs Vaginal Removal

Found through the registry condition index, not selected as a treatment recommendation. This discovery collection was restricted to studies with posted results.

Phase
NA
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2022-01-24

Laparoscopic tissue removal is one of the most challenging parts for the laparoscopic surgery. For this reason, electromechanical morcellation has long been used to facilitate the tissue removal in gynecology. However, electromechanical morcellation has long been performed inside the abdomen without any containment. Therefore, this practice has recently undergone increased scrutiny because of important concerns related to tissue dissemination during intracorporeal power morcellation. Thus, the US Food and Drug Administration released a safety communication discouraging power morcellation in laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy procedures in April 2014. As a result of this serious concern, the enclosed laparoscopic power morcellation has been come into prominence in gynecological surgery. Besides the removal of the tissues through vagina with posterior colpotomy is considered an another solution for this critical problem. In the literature the comparison for the two techniques for tissue removal is considerably scarce. Therefore researchers are aiming to prepare a trial to compare the laparoscopic enclosed electromechanical morcellation and tissue removal thorough vagina with posterior colpotomy according to surgical time, postoperative pain and postoperative sexual function.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Myoma Uteri * No prior abdominal surgery Exclusion Criteria: * Suspicious for malignancy * Prior abdominal surgery * no vaginal intercourse
healthy Volunteers
false
maximum Age
40 Years
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
FEMALE
std Ages
  1. ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    In this group, after extirpation of the myoma from the uterus and repair of the uterine defect, the myoma will be removed from the abdomen with an enclosed laparoscopic electromechanical morcellation as described in the literature by Akdemir et al with using surgical glove (Akdemir A et. al, Innovative technique for enclosed morcellation using a surgical glove. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1145-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000823.).
    intervention Names
    1. Procedure: Enclosed morcellation
    label
    enclosed morcellation
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
  2. description
    In this group, after extirpation of myoma from uterus and repair of the uterine defect, myoma will be removed through the vagina with posterior colpotomy. In this group myoma will also be removed in a enclosed fashion with using endo bag.
    intervention Names
    1. Procedure: vaginal morcellation
    label
    vaginal morcellation
    type
    ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. enclosed morcellation
    description
    After extirpation of the myoma from the uterus and repair of the uterine defect, the myoma will be removed from the abdomen with an enclosed laparoscopic electromechanical morcellation as described in the literature by Akdemir et al with using surgical glove (Akdemir A et. al, Innovative technique for enclosed morcellation using a surgical glove. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1145-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000823.).
    name
    Enclosed morcellation
    type
    PROCEDURE
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. vaginal morcellation
    description
    After extirpation of myoma from uterus and repair of the uterine defect, myoma will be removed through the vagina with posterior colpotomy. In this group myoma will also be removed in a enclosed fashion with using endo bag.
    name
    vaginal morcellation
    type
    PROCEDURE
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
SINGLE
who Masked
  1. CARE_PROVIDER
primary Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Enrollment
count
118
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
other Outcomes
  1. description
    Postoperative pain was compared between two groups using visual analog score in 0 to 10 scale. Participants were assessed in terms of pain with the Visual Pain Scale (VAS). The participants were asked to rate current pain on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS), with 0 being no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable 48 hours after operation.
    measure
    Postoperative Pain
    time Frame
    2 day
  2. description
    Sexual function will be assessed with using "Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire" and it will be compared between two groups. Participants were requested to fill FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index) forms to evaluate their sexual lives. The FSFI consists of 19 questions and is a validated questionnaire for the assessment of sexual function. The questions are grouped into the subdomains of libido, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The total score is determined by summing up the subdomains scores. Higher scores reflect better sexual function; maximum score is 36 and minimum score is 0. For each subdomain, higher scores reflect better sexual function; maximum score is 6 and minimum score is 0 including pain, in which 0 reflects lots of pain and 6 reflects the absence of pain.
    measure
    Sexual Functional Assessment
    time Frame
    3 months
primary Outcomes
  1. description
    Total operation time will be compared between two groups in seconds.
    measure
    Operation Time
    time Frame
    1 day
secondary Outcomes
  1. description
    After extirpation of the myoma in group 1 the fibroid was placed into the glove within the abdomen. The morcellation was accomplished within the completely enclosed glove. In Group 2, after extirpation of the myoma, it was removed through the vagina through posterior colpotomy. An endoscopic specimen bag was placed into the abdomen following the vaginal posterior colpotomy. Then, the fibroid was placed into the endoscopic bag within the abdomen. The specimen was removed with coring technique via scalpel. Posterior colpotomy incision was then sutured vaginally. Morcellation time is decided time between the insertion and removal of the surgical glove in group 1 and time between start of the posterior colpotomy and end of the closure of the posterior colpotomy in group 2. Tissue morcellation time compared between two groups in seconds.
    measure
    Morcellation Time
    time Frame
    1 day
Full study description
brief Summary
Laparoscopic tissue removal is one of the most challenging parts for the laparoscopic surgery. For this reason, electromechanical morcellation has long been used to facilitate the tissue removal in gynecology. However, electromechanical morcellation has long been performed inside the abdomen without any containment. Therefore, this practice has recently undergone increased scrutiny because of important concerns related to tissue dissemination during intracorporeal power morcellation. Thus, the US Food and Drug Administration released a safety communication discouraging power morcellation in laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy procedures in April 2014. As a result of this serious concern, the enclosed laparoscopic power morcellation has been come into prominence in gynecological surgery. Besides the removal of the tissues through vagina with posterior colpotomy is considered an another solution for this critical problem. In the literature the comparison for the two techniques for tissue removal is considerably scarce. Therefore researchers are aiming to prepare a trial to compare the laparoscopic enclosed electromechanical morcellation and tissue removal thorough vagina with posterior colpotomy according to surgical time, postoperative pain and postoperative sexual function.
detailed Description
In this study researchers aiming to compare the compare the laparoscopic enclosed electromechanical morcellation and tissue removal thorough vagina with posterior colpotomy according to surgical time, postoperative pain and postoperative sexual function. Patients with an indication of myomectomy, between 18 to 40 years old, without prior abdominal surgery and without suspicious of malignancy will include into the study. Anticipated number of the patients will be 60. Participants will be randomized into two groups; group 1 enclosed electromechanical morcellation will be performed to remove the myoma out of the abdominal cavity; group 2 myoma will be removed through vagina with posterior colpotomy. In group 1, after extirpation of the myoma from the uterus and repair of the uterine defect, the myoma will be removed from the abdomen with an enclosed laparoscopic electromechanical morcellation with using surgical glove. In group 2, after extirpation of myoma from uterus and repair of the uterine defect, myoma will be removed through the vagina with posterior colpotomy. In this group myoma will also be removed in a enclosed fashion with using endo bag. Tissue removal time (for group 1 removal time is decided time between the insertion and removal of the morcellation, for group two removal time is decided time between start of the posterior colpotomy and end of the closure of the posterior colpotomy), postoperative time and sexual function of the patient and any of the complications will be compared. Visual pain score and female sexual function index questionnaire will be used to assess the postoperative pain and sexual function, respectively.
Source references
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-1336d216cbd1bbff780dac70
      edge id
      nct-edge-6102630219fe6613a850
      requested nct id
      NCT02737553
      primary nct id
      NCT02737553
      source kind
      ctgov_condition_query
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      b6710ff985346052b92134d475e1f6f9b2a9bbb7c87d1a3d83093a5921deff50
      payload sha256
      c15b7b03a726c839edd5053249123a24d7f1817339833d2cda394c68977538b1
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      condition_index_match_asserted_by_registry_not_reviewed
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-6102630219fe6613a850
      link basis
      returned_by_explicit_condition_and_posted_results_filter_query
      nct id
      NCT02737553
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        NCT02737553
        end
        11
        exact text
        NCT02737553
        start
        0
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      query cond
      Vaginal Cancer
      query disease state id
      ds-vaginal-cancer
      source file
      /Users/arunverma/Documents/ChatGPT/Cancer Statistics Website/research-data/2026-09-10/clinicaltrials-condition/round-0000/raw/cond-vaginal-cancer-000.json
      source file sha256
      b6710ff985346052b92134d475e1f6f9b2a9bbb7c87d1a3d83093a5921deff50
      source json pointer
      /studies/36/protocolSection/identificationModule/nctId
      source kind
      ctgov_condition_query
      source record id
      Source null
      source string basis
      parsed_JSON_string_unmodified
      source string sha256
      63b89bb9f2d00002f212b2a71fd7298003b87ff9b06c9563f83d108167692136

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice