Change From Baseline in Lesion Size Post-treatment, by 18F-FSPG or 18F-FDGs
18F-FSPG PET/CT for Cancer Patients on Therapy · Source last updated 2019-01-03
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
NUMBER
Unit
cm2
Interval / dispersion
Not reported
Time frame
Baseline and up to 2 years
What was measured
Lesion size in centimeters (cm) were assessed in 2 dimensions from the computed tomography (CT) component of PET/CT and the area in cm2 calculated for lesion locations at baseline and after treatment. Time frame was specified by protocol as at baseline, and at the time of clinical assessments during individual patient regular medical care. The time of the post-treatment assessment was not otherwise explicitly defined but could be anytime within 2 years. The outcome is reported the difference in area in cm² for each lesion (a number without dispersion).
Analysis population: * Lesion locations not detected both before and after treatment are reported as N/A for 2-D area (in the effect that an assessment could be made with the other radiolabel).
* Lesions detected at either before or after treatment only are reported as the difference from zero.
Groups in this outcome
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
Participants sequentially receive radioimaging agent 18F-FSPG IV followed by PET/CT scan with 60 minutes.
18F-FSPG: Administered intravenously (IV)
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
Participants sequentially receive radioimaging agent 18F-FDG IV followed by PET/CT scan with 60 minutes.
18F-FDG: Administered intravenously (IV)
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
7
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
7
Analysis denominator · Lesion locations assessed
Group
Source count
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
17
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
26
Reported measurements
Adrenal / adrenal mass, left
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
11.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Adrenal / hepatic dome
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-2.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Adrenal / liver metastatis
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-1.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Adrenal / lung base metastatis, lower lobe right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
1.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Adrenal / lung metastatis, left
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-0.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / infrascapular subcut
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
0.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FDG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Lung / abdominal wall, upper quadrant right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
7.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
6.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / adajcent subcarinal lymph node
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
3.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / aortopulmonary window lymph node
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
-1.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-2.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / hilar lymph node, left
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-2.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / infraspinatus mm, right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
10.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
10.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / lingula nodule
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
-1.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-2.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / mass, upper lobe left
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
-8.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-6.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / mass, lower lobe right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-14.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / nodule 1, lower lobe right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-0.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / nodule 2, upper lobe right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
-1.7
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-1.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / nodule, upper lobe right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-0.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / paraesophageal lymph node
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
0.9
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FDG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Lung / post-basal, lower lobe right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-3.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lung / subcarinal lymph node
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
1.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
11.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Renal / adrenal mass, right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
3.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
7.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Renal / aortopulmonary window lymph node, left
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
1.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-1.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Renal / gluteal subcutaneous nodule
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
0.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
0.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Renal / interlobar
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
2.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FDG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Renal / kidney midpole, right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
-1.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-1.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Renal / omental nodule
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
-0.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
1.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Renal / paratracheal lymph node, right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
0.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-2.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Renal / parotid, right
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
NA
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
-2.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Renal / retroperitoneal lymph node, left
Values in cm2 · Interval/dispersion: Not reported
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
1.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
2.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
comment
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
group Id
OG000
value
NA
group Id
OG001
value
11.3
title
Adrenal / adrenal mass, left
categories
measurements
comment
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
group Id
OG000
value
NA
group Id
OG001
value
-2.0
title
Adrenal / hepatic dome
categories
measurements
comment
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
group Id
OG000
value
NA
group Id
OG001
value
-1.3
title
Adrenal / liver metastatis
categories
measurements
comment
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
group Id
OG000
value
NA
group Id
OG001
value
1.4
title
Adrenal / lung base metastatis, lower lobe right
categories
measurements
comment
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
group Id
OG000
value
NA
group Id
OG001
value
-0.7
title
Adrenal / lung metastatis, left
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
0.2
comment
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FDG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
group Id
OG001
value
NA
title
Lung / infrascapular subcut
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
7.6
group Id
OG001
value
6.9
title
Lung / abdominal wall, upper quadrant right
categories
measurements
comment
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
group Id
OG000
value
NA
group Id
OG001
value
3.0
title
Lung / adajcent subcarinal lymph node
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
-1.1
group Id
OG001
value
-2.8
title
Lung / aortopulmonary window lymph node
categories
measurements
comment
Lesion location was not detected by 18F-FSPG both before and after treatment, and no difference can be reported for 2-D area.
group Id
OG000
value
NA
group Id
OG001
value
-2.3
title
Lung / hilar lymph node, left
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
10.4
group Id
OG001
value
10.2
title
Lung / infraspinatus mm, right
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
value
-1.7
group Id
OG001
value
-2.7
title
Lung / lingula nodule
denom Units Selected
Lesion locations assessed
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
7
group Id
OG001
value
7
units
Participants
counts
group Id
OG000
value
17
group Id
OG001
value
26
units
Lesion locations assessed
description
Lesion size in centimeters (cm) were assessed in 2 dimensions from the computed tomography (CT) component of PET/CT and the area in cm2 calculated for lesion locations at baseline and after treatment. Time frame was specified by protocol as at baseline, and at the time of clinical assessments during individual patient regular medical care. The time of the post-treatment assessment was not otherwise explicitly defined but could be anytime within 2 years. The outcome is reported the difference in area in cm² for each lesion (a number without dispersion).
groups
description
Participants sequentially receive radioimaging agent 18F-FSPG IV followed by PET/CT scan with 60 minutes.
18F-FSPG: Administered intravenously (IV)
id
OG000
title
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FSPG
description
Participants sequentially receive radioimaging agent 18F-FDG IV followed by PET/CT scan with 60 minutes.
18F-FDG: Administered intravenously (IV)
id
OG001
title
Difference in Lesion Size as Detected by 18F-FDG
param Type
NUMBER
population Description
* Lesion locations not detected both before and after treatment are reported as N/A for 2-D area (in the effect that an assessment could be made with the other radiolabel).
* Lesions detected at either before or after treatment only are reported as the difference from zero.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline and up to 2 years
title
Change From Baseline in Lesion Size Post-treatment, by 18F-FSPG or 18F-FDGs