Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT02486718 · OUTCOME

DFS in the Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) SP263 ≥ 1% Tumor Cell (TC) Subpopulation Within the Stage II-IIIA Population

Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A) Compared to Best Supportive Care Following Chemotherapy in Patients With Lung Cancer [IMpower010] · Source last updated 2026-07-29

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Up to 95 months

What was measured

DFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first recurrence of NSCLC or occurrence of new primary NSCLC as determined by the investigator or death, whichever occurs first. DFS was analyzed in PD-L1 ≥1% subpopulation within the Stage II-IIIA population. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the median DFS for each treatment arm.

Analysis population: PD-L1 subpopulation, defined as ≥1% TC expression by the SP263 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay, included Stage II-IIIA population with valid PD-L1 SP263 measurement at baseline. Stage II-IIIA population included all randomized participants with extent of disease as either Stage II or Stage III, \& is a subset of ITT population. Randomized ITT population included all randomized participants with resected Stage IB (tumors ≥ 4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC whether the participant received the assigned treatment.

Groups in this outcome

Atezolizumab

Participants who did not experience disease recurrence after chemotherapy in enrollment phase received 1200 milligrams (mg) of atezolizumab intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W) for sixteen 21-day cycles in the randomization phase.

Best Supportive Care (BSC)

Participants who did not experience disease recurrence after chemotherapy in enrollment phase received no treatment in the randomization phase BSC arm.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Atezolizumab248
Best Supportive Care (BSC)228

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Atezolizumab68.5Not reported51.8NAThe upper limit of the 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
Best Supportive Care (BSC)37.3Not reported30.157.8Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.545
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.910
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.704
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.545
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.910
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.704
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. comment
        The upper limit of the 95% CI was not estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
        group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        51.8
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        68.5
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        30.1
        upper Limit
        57.8
        value
        37.3
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      248
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      228
    units
    Participants
description
DFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first recurrence of NSCLC or occurrence of new primary NSCLC as determined by the investigator or death, whichever occurs first. DFS was analyzed in PD-L1 ≥1% subpopulation within the Stage II-IIIA population. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the median DFS for each treatment arm.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants who did not experience disease recurrence after chemotherapy in enrollment phase received 1200 milligrams (mg) of atezolizumab intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W) for sixteen 21-day cycles in the randomization phase.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Atezolizumab
  2. description
    Participants who did not experience disease recurrence after chemotherapy in enrollment phase received no treatment in the randomization phase BSC arm.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Best Supportive Care (BSC)
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
PD-L1 subpopulation, defined as ≥1% TC expression by the SP263 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay, included Stage II-IIIA population with valid PD-L1 SP263 measurement at baseline. Stage II-IIIA population included all randomized participants with extent of disease as either Stage II or Stage III, \& is a subset of ITT population. Randomized ITT population included all randomized participants with resected Stage IB (tumors ≥ 4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC whether the participant received the assigned treatment.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Up to 95 months
title
DFS in the Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) SP263 ≥ 1% Tumor Cell (TC) Subpopulation Within the Stage II-IIIA Population
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice