Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Single Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and End of Treatment
Cabazitaxel Versus the Switch to Alternative AR-targeted Agent (Enzalutamide or Abiraterone) in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients Previously Treated With Docetaxel and Who Rapidly Failed a Prior AR-targeted Agent · Source last updated 2022-05-27
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEAN
Unit
score on a scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Deviation
Time frame
Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, Cycle 5, Cycle 6, Cycle 7, Cycle 8 and at End of Treatment (any time up to: 141 weeks)
What was measured
EQ-5D was a standardized HRQOL questionnaire consisting of EQ-5D descriptive system and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression measured on 3 levels (no problem, some problems \& severe problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. 5 dimensional 3-level system was converted into single index utility score. Possible values for single index utility score ranged from -0.594 (severe problems in all dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in all dimensions) on scale where 1 represented best possible health state. EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS scale ranging from 0-100, where 0=worst imaginable health state and 100=best imaginable health state, where higher states indicated better outcomes. Baseline corresponded to last evaluable assessment before treatment administration.
Analysis population: Analysis was performed on Health status population which included participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and with an evaluable EQ-5D-5L at baseline and with at least one post-baseline evaluable EQ-5D-5L. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies participants with available data for each specified category.
Groups in this outcome
Cabazitaxel
Participants received Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2 IV infusion for over 1 hour on Day 1 of each 3 week treatment cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally once daily and primary prophylactic G-CSF as per investigator decision, until radiographic disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or participant's refusal of further study treatment (median duration = 22 weeks).
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
Participants received either abiraterone acetate 1000 mg orally once daily from Day 1 to Day 21 of each 3 week treatment cycle in combination with prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily; or enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily continuously from Day 1 to Day 21 of each 3 week treatment cycle, until radiographic disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or participant's refusal of further study treatment (median duration = 12.5 weeks).
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
115
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
115
Reported measurements
Cycle 2: VAS
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
108
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
109
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
3.6
14.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
0.9
14.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 3: VAS
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
104
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
94
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
4.5
15.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
1.5
13.4
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 4: VAS
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
100
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
77
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
4.6
16.5
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-1.1
18.2
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 5: VAS
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
84
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
57
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
0.6
17.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
3.2
17.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 6: VAS
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
68
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
39
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
-1.3
22.8
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-1.5
23.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 7: VAS
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
60
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
32
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
2.9
18.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-0.2
20.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 8: VAS
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
49
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
23
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
2.8
18.0
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
1.2
19.6
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of treatment: VAS
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
56
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
33
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
-3.3
19.3
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-5.9
23.1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 2: Utility Index Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
108
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
109
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
0.026
0.179
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-0.010
0.178
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 3: Utility Index Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
103
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
94
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
0.041
0.183
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-0.011
0.182
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 4: Utility Index Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
99
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
79
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
0.051
0.176
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-0.002
0.188
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 5: Utility Index Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
79
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
59
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
0.027
0.209
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-0.035
0.185
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 6: Utility Index Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
67
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
42
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
0.015
0.191
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-0.000
0.176
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 7: Utility Index Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
60
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
34
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
0.029
0.182
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
0.024
0.153
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cycle 8: Utility Index Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
47
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
24
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
0.008
0.213
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-0.014
0.138
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
End of treatment: Utility Index Score
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Cabazitaxel
56
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
35
Values in score on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Cabazitaxel
-0.048
0.188
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
-0.079
0.200
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
14.4
value
3.6
group Id
OG001
spread
14.6
value
0.9
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
108
group Id
OG001
value
109
units
Participants
title
Cycle 2: VAS
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
15.0
value
4.5
group Id
OG001
spread
13.4
value
1.5
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
104
group Id
OG001
value
94
units
Participants
title
Cycle 3: VAS
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
16.5
value
4.6
group Id
OG001
spread
18.2
value
-1.1
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
100
group Id
OG001
value
77
units
Participants
title
Cycle 4: VAS
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
17.1
value
0.6
group Id
OG001
spread
17.0
value
3.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
84
group Id
OG001
value
57
units
Participants
title
Cycle 5: VAS
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
22.8
value
-1.3
group Id
OG001
spread
23.1
value
-1.5
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
68
group Id
OG001
value
39
units
Participants
title
Cycle 6: VAS
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.1
value
2.9
group Id
OG001
spread
20.1
value
-0.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
60
group Id
OG001
value
32
units
Participants
title
Cycle 7: VAS
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.0
value
2.8
group Id
OG001
spread
19.6
value
1.2
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
49
group Id
OG001
value
23
units
Participants
title
Cycle 8: VAS
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
19.3
value
-3.3
group Id
OG001
spread
23.1
value
-5.9
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
56
group Id
OG001
value
33
units
Participants
title
End of treatment: VAS
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.179
value
0.026
group Id
OG001
spread
0.178
value
-0.010
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
108
group Id
OG001
value
109
units
Participants
title
Cycle 2: Utility Index Score
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.183
value
0.041
group Id
OG001
spread
0.182
value
-0.011
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
103
group Id
OG001
value
94
units
Participants
title
Cycle 3: Utility Index Score
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.176
value
0.051
group Id
OG001
spread
0.188
value
-0.002
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
99
group Id
OG001
value
79
units
Participants
title
Cycle 4: Utility Index Score
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
0.209
value
0.027
group Id
OG001
spread
0.185
value
-0.035
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
79
group Id
OG001
value
59
units
Participants
title
Cycle 5: Utility Index Score
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
115
group Id
OG001
value
115
units
Participants
description
EQ-5D was a standardized HRQOL questionnaire consisting of EQ-5D descriptive system and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression measured on 3 levels (no problem, some problems \& severe problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. 5 dimensional 3-level system was converted into single index utility score. Possible values for single index utility score ranged from -0.594 (severe problems in all dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in all dimensions) on scale where 1 represented best possible health state. EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS scale ranging from 0-100, where 0=worst imaginable health state and 100=best imaginable health state, where higher states indicated better outcomes. Baseline corresponded to last evaluable assessment before treatment administration.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Participants received Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m\^2 IV infusion for over 1 hour on Day 1 of each 3 week treatment cycle in combination with Prednisone 10 mg orally once daily and primary prophylactic G-CSF as per investigator decision, until radiographic disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or participant's refusal of further study treatment (median duration = 22 weeks).
id
OG000
title
Cabazitaxel
description
Participants received either abiraterone acetate 1000 mg orally once daily from Day 1 to Day 21 of each 3 week treatment cycle in combination with prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily; or enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily continuously from Day 1 to Day 21 of each 3 week treatment cycle, until radiographic disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or participant's refusal of further study treatment (median duration = 12.5 weeks).
id
OG001
title
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide
param Type
MEAN
population Description
Analysis was performed on Health status population which included participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and with an evaluable EQ-5D-5L at baseline and with at least one post-baseline evaluable EQ-5D-5L. Here 'Number analyzed' signifies participants with available data for each specified category.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, Cycle 5, Cycle 6, Cycle 7, Cycle 8 and at End of Treatment (any time up to: 141 weeks)
title
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Single Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and End of Treatment