Skip to content
← Study library

NCT02434107 · CITED IN SOURCE DOCUMENTS

Complete Lymph Node Dissection vs Watchful Waiting in Patients With Malignant Melanoma (Thickness of 1,0mm+ and Evidence of Metastases in the Sentinel Node)

An NCI or FDA source cites this study. A citation does not establish that it applies to an individual diagnosis.

Phase
NA
Status at capture
COMPLETED
Registry last update
2022-12-21

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is considered as standard diagnostic procedure in melanoma patients carrying a reasonable risk for metastases. In numerous studies the prognostic role of micro metastases in the sentinel node (SN) was described. However, the prognostic value of a complete lymph node dissection in patients with a positive SN is still unclear. This study was planned to analyse the survival outcome of patients with a positive SN receiving complete lymphadenectomy versus watchful waiting.

Open the original ClinicalTrials.gov record → · Download preserved record

What did the study report?

Outcomes, safety and baseline populations are separate source sections. Quality-of-life measures appear under their original outcome titles.

No posted result sections were captured. Registered plans do not establish that a treatment works.

Who could take part
eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Cutaneous melanoma with a tumour thickness of at least 1,00mm * Positive sentinel node with micro metastases of max. 2mm in diameter Exclusion Criteria: * Mucosal or ocular melanoma * Cutaneous melanoma located in the head/neck region * Evidence of satellite, in transit or local metastases / recurrences * Macro metastases of the SN or micro metastases of \>2mm in diameter * Additional immune-suppressive therapy * Pregnant of lactating women
healthy Volunteers
false
maximum Age
75 Years
minimum Age
18 Years
sex
ALL
std Ages
  1. ADULT
  2. OLDER_ADULT
Treatment arms and interventions
arm Groups
  1. description
    Completion Lymphadenectomy and monitoring afterwards
    intervention Names
    1. Procedure: Completion Lymphadenectomy
    label
    Completion Lymphadenectomy
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
  2. description
    Monitoring only
    intervention Names
    1. Procedure: Clinical Monitoring (Palpation and node ultrasound)
    label
    Clinical Monitoring (Palpation and node ultrasound)
    type
    EXPERIMENTAL
interventions
  1. arm Group Labels
    1. Completion Lymphadenectomy
    name
    Completion Lymphadenectomy
    type
    PROCEDURE
  2. arm Group Labels
    1. Clinical Monitoring (Palpation and node ultrasound)
    name
    Clinical Monitoring (Palpation and node ultrasound)
    type
    PROCEDURE
Study design
allocation
RANDOMIZED
intervention Model
PARALLEL
masking Info
masking
NONE
primary Purpose
TREATMENT
Enrollment
count
483
type
ACTUAL
Registered outcome plans (not posted results)
primary Outcomes
  1. measure
    Distant metastases free survival
    time Frame
    3 Years
secondary Outcomes
  1. measure
    Distant metastases free survival
    time Frame
    5 Years
Full study description
brief Summary
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is considered as standard diagnostic procedure in melanoma patients carrying a reasonable risk for metastases. In numerous studies the prognostic role of micro metastases in the sentinel node (SN) was described. However, the prognostic value of a complete lymph node dissection in patients with a positive SN is still unclear. This study was planned to analyse the survival outcome of patients with a positive SN receiving complete lymphadenectomy versus watchful waiting.
Source references
references
  1. citation
    Leiter U, Stadler R, Mauch C, Hohenberger W, Brockmeyer NH, Berking C, Sunderkotter C, Kaatz M, Schatton K, Lehmann P, Vogt T, Ulrich J, Herbst R, Gehring W, Simon JC, Keim U, Verver D, Martus P, Garbe C; German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group. Final Analysis of DeCOG-SLT Trial: No Survival Benefit for Complete Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma With Positive Sentinel Node. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 10;37(32):3000-3008. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02306. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
    pmid
    31557067
    type
    DERIVED
  2. citation
    Leiter U, Stadler R, Mauch C, Hohenberger W, Brockmeyer N, Berking C, Sunderkotter C, Kaatz M, Schulte KW, Lehmann P, Vogt T, Ulrich J, Herbst R, Gehring W, Simon JC, Keim U, Martus P, Garbe C; German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG). Complete lymph node dissection versus no dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy positive melanoma (DeCOG-SLT): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):757-767. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00141-8. Epub 2016 May 5.
    pmid
    27161539
    type
    DERIVED
Source notices and limitations
    Discovery and provenance
    1. release id
      ctgov-registry-7ad944f6deaf1f5cd6122126
      edge id
      nct-edge-eff3f704a3bf477215db
      requested nct id
      NCT02434107
      primary nct id
      NCT02434107
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source file sha256
      719775cb8adafac157fae579695d5225c0957562da450bf6f429433b407c581a
      payload sha256
      02ccb74c3071ab2960c59ba0256c55fa4047c24923644c946a2bea8ea153c769
      payload
      clinical indication matching status
      not_inferred
      end exclusive
      true
      id
      nct-edge-eff3f704a3bf477215db
      link basis
      explicit_NCT_identifier_in_acquired_source
      nct id
      NCT02434107
      occurrences
      1. context exact
        sentinel lymph node tumor &gt;1 mm in diameter) that would benefit from a complete lymph node dissection.</li></ul></div></li><li>The <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT02434107">DeCOG-SLT</a> trial (NCT02434107) included 483 patients with primary melanoma and microscopically detected nodal metastases. Patients were randomly assigned
        end
        164011
        exact text
        NCT02434107
        start
        164000
      2. context exact
        m in diameter) that would benefit from a complete lymph node dissection.</li></ul></div></li><li>The <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT02434107">DeCOG-SLT</a> trial (NCT02434107) included 483 patients with primary melanoma and microscopically detected nodal metastases. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either completion lymph
        end
        164045
        exact text
        NCT02434107
        start
        164034
      3. context exact
        r a sentinel lymph node tumor diameter &gt;1 mm) that would benefit from a complete lymph node dissection.</li></ul></div></li><li>The <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT02434107">DeCOG-SLT</a> trial (NCT02434107) included 483 patients with primary melanoma and microscopically detected nodal metastases. Patients were randomly assigned
        end
        182664
        exact text
        NCT02434107
        start
        182653
      4. context exact
        eter &gt;1 mm) that would benefit from a complete lymph node dissection.</li></ul></div></li><li>The <a href="/clinicaltrials/NCT02434107">DeCOG-SLT</a> trial (NCT02434107) included 483 patients with primary melanoma and microscopically detected nodal metastases. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo completion lymphadenect
        end
        182698
        exact text
        NCT02434107
        start
        182687
      offset unit
      unicode_code_points
      source file
      /tmp/cancer-full-research/nci/raw/498bb790d49a11b74e.html
      source file sha256
      719775cb8adafac157fae579695d5225c0957562da450bf6f429433b407c581a
      source json pointer
      Source null
      source kind
      nci_explicit_reference_or_link
      source record id
      Source null
      source retrieved at
      2026-09-09T23:22:15.974415+00:00
      source string basis
      UTF-8_text_with_universal_newline_translation
      source string sha256
      10578b000af9132c9cfe25a00f45be6680f43e992f5c12f2b6697492c4a5ca2e
      source title
      Melanoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version
      source update dates
      1. context
        Updated: May 2, 2025
        datetime
        2025-05-02T12:00:00Z
        display
        May 2, 2025

    Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice