Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Ipilimumab in Prevention of Recurrence of Melanoma After Complete Resection of Stage IIIb/c or Stage IV Melanoma · Source last updated 2025-04-24
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
Measure
MEAN
Unit
Scores on a scale
Interval / dispersion
Standard Deviation
Time frame
up to 36 months
What was measured
HRQoL was measured by mean changes from baseline in EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL composite scale and in remaining EORTC QLQ-C30 scales in all randomized participants.
EORTC QLQ-C30 is the most commonly used QoL instrument in melanoma clinical studies, is a 30-item instrument that has gained wide acceptance in oncology clinical studies and comprises 5 functional scales (physical functioning, cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning and global quality of life) as well as nine symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Except for the overall health status and global quality of life items, responses for all items are 4 point categorical scales ranging from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The overall health status/quality of life responses are 7-point Likert scales for which higher score reflects higher health status/quality of life for the 7-point Likert scale.
Analysis population: All randomized Participants with values from the second follow-up visit
Groups in this outcome
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV q2 wks and Ipilimumab placebo IV q3 wks for 4 doses then q12 wks starting at Wk 24
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg IV q3 wks for 4 doses then q12 wks starting at Wk 24 and Nivolumab placebo IV q2 wks
Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
334
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
308
Reported measurements
Physical functioning
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
327
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
307
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
-2.04
15.134
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
-4.88
15.713
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Role functioning
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
329
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
307
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
-2.43
25.219
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
-3.85
29.951
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Emotional functioning
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
330
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
307
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
0.18
20.282
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
1.43
17.911
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Cognitive functioning
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
330
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
307
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
-3.74
18.364
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
-4.67
16.664
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Social functioning
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
330
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
307
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
-0.51
22.085
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
-3.53
26.391
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Global health status
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
330
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
307
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
-5.81
20.046
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
-7.00
23.109
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Fatigue
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
329
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
307
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
6.45
21.605
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
9.05
23.475
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Nausea and vomiting
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
329
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
307
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
2.23
12.622
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
1.90
11.473
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Pain
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
331
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
308
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
1.66
23.314
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
4.38
23.641
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Dyspnea
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
328
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
306
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
7.32
22.741
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
5.45
20.364
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Insomnia
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
329
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
306
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
1.82
28.692
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
3.05
28.785
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Appetite loss
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
328
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
307
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
4.07
22.660
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
2.61
19.257
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Constipation
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
329
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
307
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
1.11
17.904
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
0.33
18.373
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Diarrhea
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
330
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
306
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
1.31
20.831
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
3.38
21.242
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Financial difficulties
Analysis denominator · Participants
Group
Source count
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
330
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
306
Values in Scores on a scale · Interval/dispersion: Standard Deviation
Group
Value
Spread
Lower
Upper
Comment
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
-1.41
23.348
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
0.54
20.282
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Complete source fields
classes
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
15.134
value
-2.04
group Id
OG001
spread
15.713
value
-4.88
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
327
group Id
OG001
value
307
units
Participants
title
Physical functioning
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
25.219
value
-2.43
group Id
OG001
spread
29.951
value
-3.85
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
329
group Id
OG001
value
307
units
Participants
title
Role functioning
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
20.282
value
0.18
group Id
OG001
spread
17.911
value
1.43
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
330
group Id
OG001
value
307
units
Participants
title
Emotional functioning
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
18.364
value
-3.74
group Id
OG001
spread
16.664
value
-4.67
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
330
group Id
OG001
value
307
units
Participants
title
Cognitive functioning
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
22.085
value
-0.51
group Id
OG001
spread
26.391
value
-3.53
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
330
group Id
OG001
value
307
units
Participants
title
Social functioning
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
20.046
value
-5.81
group Id
OG001
spread
23.109
value
-7.00
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
330
group Id
OG001
value
307
units
Participants
title
Global health status
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
21.605
value
6.45
group Id
OG001
spread
23.475
value
9.05
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
329
group Id
OG001
value
307
units
Participants
title
Fatigue
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
12.622
value
2.23
group Id
OG001
spread
11.473
value
1.90
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
329
group Id
OG001
value
307
units
Participants
title
Nausea and vomiting
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
23.314
value
1.66
group Id
OG001
spread
23.641
value
4.38
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
331
group Id
OG001
value
308
units
Participants
title
Pain
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
22.741
value
7.32
group Id
OG001
spread
20.364
value
5.45
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
328
group Id
OG001
value
306
units
Participants
title
Dyspnea
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
28.692
value
1.82
group Id
OG001
spread
28.785
value
3.05
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
329
group Id
OG001
value
306
units
Participants
title
Insomnia
categories
measurements
group Id
OG000
spread
22.660
value
4.07
group Id
OG001
spread
19.257
value
2.61
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
328
group Id
OG001
value
307
units
Participants
title
Appetite loss
denoms
counts
group Id
OG000
value
334
group Id
OG001
value
308
units
Participants
description
HRQoL was measured by mean changes from baseline in EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL composite scale and in remaining EORTC QLQ-C30 scales in all randomized participants.
EORTC QLQ-C30 is the most commonly used QoL instrument in melanoma clinical studies, is a 30-item instrument that has gained wide acceptance in oncology clinical studies and comprises 5 functional scales (physical functioning, cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning and global quality of life) as well as nine symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Except for the overall health status and global quality of life items, responses for all items are 4 point categorical scales ranging from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The overall health status/quality of life responses are 7-point Likert scales for which higher score reflects higher health status/quality of life for the 7-point Likert scale.
dispersion Type
Standard Deviation
groups
description
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV q2 wks and Ipilimumab placebo IV q3 wks for 4 doses then q12 wks starting at Wk 24
id
OG000
title
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg
description
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg IV q3 wks for 4 doses then q12 wks starting at Wk 24 and Nivolumab placebo IV q2 wks
id
OG001
title
Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg
param Type
MEAN
population Description
All randomized Participants with values from the second follow-up visit