Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT02366143 · OUTCOME

Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Determined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Score

A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin Plus (+) Paclitaxel With or Without Bevacizumab Compared With Carboplatin+Paclitaxel+Bevacizumab in Participants With Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) · Source last updated 2021-09-23

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
Months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Baseline up to approximately 29 months

What was measured

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated \& reliable self-report measure (Aaronson et al.1993;Fitzsimmons et al.1999) that consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of patient functioning (physical,emotional,role, cognitive,and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea \& vomiting, pain),global health/quality of life,and six single items (dyspnea,insomnia, appetite loss,constipation,diarrhea, and financial difficulties). EORTC QLQ-C30 is scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. 2001). All EORTC scales and single-item measures are linearly transformed so that each score has a range of 0-100. A high score for a functional/global health status scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning/HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life);however a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. A ≥10-point change in the symptoms subscale score is perceived by patients as clinically significant (Osoba et al.1998).

Analysis population: Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

Groups in this outcome

Arm A (Atezolizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)

Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.

Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)

Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab and bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab until loss of clinical benefit and bevacizumab until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death during maintenance treatment phase.

Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)

Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab during maintenance treatment phase until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)348
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)356
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)336

Reported measurements

Dyspnea in Teff-high WT Population

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)161
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)155
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)129
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)NANot reportedNANAValue is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)NANot reportedNANAValue is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)NANot reportedNANAValue is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
Dyspnea in ITT-WT Population

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)348
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)356
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)336
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Arm A (Atezolizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)NANot reportedNANAValue is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)NANot reportedNANAValue is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)NANot reportedNANAValue is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.571
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.450
    group Description
    Teff-high WT Population
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.6899
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.909
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.413
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.089
    group Description
    Teff-high WT Population
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.1043
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.671
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  3. ci Lower Limit
    0.912
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.665
    group Description
    ITT WT
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.1730
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.232
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  4. ci Lower Limit
    0.792
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.483
    group Description
    ITT WT
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.6145
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.084
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.571
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.450
    group Description
    Teff-high WT Population
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.6899
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.909
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.413
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.089
    group Description
    Teff-high WT Population
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.1043
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.671
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  3. ci Lower Limit
    0.912
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.665
    group Description
    ITT WT
    group Ids
    1. OG001
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.1730
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.232
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  4. ci Lower Limit
    0.792
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    1.483
    group Description
    ITT WT
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG002
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.6145
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    1.084
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. comment
        Value is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
        group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        NA
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
      2. comment
        Value is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
        group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        NA
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
      3. comment
        Value is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
        group Id
        OG002
        lower Limit
        NA
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        161
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        155
      3. group Id
        OG002
        value
        129
      units
      Participants
    title
    Dyspnea in Teff-high WT Population
  2. categories
    1. measurements
      1. comment
        Value is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
        group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        NA
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
      2. comment
        Value is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
        group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        NA
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
      3. comment
        Value is not available due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. Median is not reached and the confidence limit is not estimable by Brookmeyer and Crowley method due to insufficient observed events.
        group Id
        OG002
        lower Limit
        NA
        upper Limit
        NA
        value
        NA
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        348
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        356
      3. group Id
        OG002
        value
        336
      units
      Participants
    title
    Dyspnea in ITT-WT Population
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      348
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      356
    3. group Id
      OG002
      value
      336
    units
    Participants
description
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated \& reliable self-report measure (Aaronson et al.1993;Fitzsimmons et al.1999) that consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of patient functioning (physical,emotional,role, cognitive,and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea \& vomiting, pain),global health/quality of life,and six single items (dyspnea,insomnia, appetite loss,constipation,diarrhea, and financial difficulties). EORTC QLQ-C30 is scored according to the EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. 2001). All EORTC scales and single-item measures are linearly transformed so that each score has a range of 0-100. A high score for a functional/global health status scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning/HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life);however a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. A ≥10-point change in the symptoms subscale score is perceived by patients as clinically significant (Osoba et al.1998).
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab during maintenance treatment phase until loss of clinical benefit.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Arm A (Atezolizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
  2. description
    Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab and bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab until loss of clinical benefit and bevacizumab until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death during maintenance treatment phase.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)
  3. description
    Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab during maintenance treatment phase until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death.
    id
    OG002
    title
    Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
Teff-high WT population is defined as the Teff-high population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation. ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline up to approximately 29 months
title
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Patient-Reported Lung Cancer Symptoms Determined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Score
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
Months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice