Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT02366143 · OUTCOME

PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High Population and ITT Population

A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin Plus (+) Paclitaxel With or Without Bevacizumab Compared With Carboplatin+Paclitaxel+Bevacizumab in Participants With Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) · Source last updated 2021-09-23

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
Months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)

What was measured

PFS, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, in Arm B versus C in the Teff high population and ITT population.

Analysis population: Teff-high population is defined as the patients in the ITT population with Teff signature expression \>=-1.91. ITT population is defined as all randomized patients, regardless of receipt of the assigned treatment.

Groups in this outcome

Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)

Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab and bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab until loss of clinical benefit and bevacizumab until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death during maintenance treatment phase.

Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)

Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab during maintenance treatment phase until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)400
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)400

Reported measurements

Teff-high Population

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)166
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)148
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)11.3Not reported9.113.0Not reported
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)6.8Not reported5.87.3Not reported
ITT Population

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)400
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)400
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)8.3Not reported7.99.8Not reported
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)6.8Not reported6.07.1Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.374
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.649
    group Description
    Teff-high Population
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <.0001
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.492
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.517
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.720
    group Description
    ITT Population
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <.0001
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.610
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.374
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.649
    group Description
    Teff-high Population
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <.0001
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.492
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
  2. ci Lower Limit
    0.517
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.720
    group Description
    ITT Population
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    <.0001
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.610
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        9.1
        upper Limit
        13.0
        value
        11.3
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        5.8
        upper Limit
        7.3
        value
        6.8
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        166
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        148
      units
      Participants
    title
    Teff-high Population
  2. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        7.9
        upper Limit
        9.8
        value
        8.3
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        6.0
        upper Limit
        7.1
        value
        6.8
    denoms
    1. counts
      1. group Id
        OG000
        value
        400
      2. group Id
        OG001
        value
        400
      units
      Participants
    title
    ITT Population
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      400
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      400
    units
    Participants
description
PFS, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, in Arm B versus C in the Teff high population and ITT population.
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab and bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab until loss of clinical benefit and bevacizumab until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death during maintenance treatment phase.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)
  2. description
    Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab during maintenance treatment phase until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
Teff-high population is defined as the patients in the ITT population with Teff signature expression \>=-1.91. ITT population is defined as all randomized patients, regardless of receipt of the assigned treatment.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 29 months)
title
PFS, as Determined by the Investigator in Arm B Versus Arm C in Teff High Population and ITT Population
type
SECONDARY
unit Of Measure
Months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice