Skip to content
← Full study record

NCT02366143 · OUTCOME

Overall Survival (OS) in Arm B Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population

A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin Plus (+) Paclitaxel With or Without Bevacizumab Compared With Carboplatin+Paclitaxel+Bevacizumab in Participants With Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) · Source last updated 2021-09-23

Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.

Measure
MEDIAN
Unit
Months
Interval / dispersion
95% Confidence Interval
Time frame
Baseline until death until data cut-off on 22 January 2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

What was measured

Overall Survival (OS) in Arm B Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population

Analysis population: ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.

Groups in this outcome

Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)

Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab and bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab until loss of clinical benefit and bevacizumab until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death during maintenance treatment phase.

Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)

Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab during maintenance treatment phase until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death.

Group identifiers and denominators belong to this outcome only. They may differ in another outcome or in safety reporting.

Analysis denominator · Participants

GroupSource count
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)359
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)337

Reported measurements

Source class 1
Values in Months · Interval/dispersion: 95% Confidence Interval
GroupValueSpreadLowerUpperComment
Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)19.2Not reported17.023.8Not reported
Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)14.7Not reported13.316.9Not reported

Source statistical analyses

Group order, estimate direction, methods and comments are retained. No treatment ranking is inferred.

  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.64
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.96
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.0164
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.78
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
Complete source fields
analyses
  1. ci Lower Limit
    0.64
    ci Num Sides
    TWO_SIDED
    ci Pct Value
    95
    ci Upper Limit
    0.96
    group Ids
    1. OG000
    2. OG001
    non Inferiority Comment
    Stratified Analysis
    non Inferiority Type
    SUPERIORITY
    p Value
    0.0164
    param Type
    Hazard Ratio (HR)
    param Value
    0.78
    statistical Method
    Log Rank
classes
  1. categories
    1. measurements
      1. group Id
        OG000
        lower Limit
        17.0
        upper Limit
        23.8
        value
        19.2
      2. group Id
        OG001
        lower Limit
        13.3
        upper Limit
        16.9
        value
        14.7
denoms
  1. counts
    1. group Id
      OG000
      value
      359
    2. group Id
      OG001
      value
      337
    units
    Participants
description
Overall Survival (OS) in Arm B Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population
dispersion Type
95% Confidence Interval
groups
  1. description
    Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab and bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or until loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of atezolizumab until loss of clinical benefit and bevacizumab until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death during maintenance treatment phase.
    id
    OG000
    title
    Arm B (Atezolizumab+Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel + Carboplatin)
  2. description
    Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle followed by IV infusion of paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 or 6 cycles or loss of clinical benefit whichever occurs first, during induction treatment phase. Participants received IV infusion of bevacizumab during maintenance treatment phase until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death.
    id
    OG001
    title
    Arm C (Bevacizumab+Paclitaxel+Carboplatin)
param Type
MEDIAN
population Description
ITT-WT population is defined as the ITT population excluding patients with an activating EGFR mutation or ALK translocation.
reporting Status
POSTED
time Frame
Baseline until death until data cut-off on 22 January 2018 (up to approximately 34 months)
title
Overall Survival (OS) in Arm B Versus Arm C in ITT-WT Population
type
PRIMARY
unit Of Measure
Months

Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0

Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice