NCT02358031 · OUTCOME
Pembro Mono vs Control: TTD in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life (Items 29 and 30) Combined Score
Results reported by the registry submitting party. Population, time horizon, units and missing values must be read together.
- Measure
- MEDIAN
- Unit
- Months
- Interval / dispersion
- 95% Confidence Interval
- Time frame
- Baseline up to approximately 12 months
What was measured
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to the GHS question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" (Item 29) and the QoL question "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" (Item 30) were scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicating a better overall outcome. TTD in GHS/QoL defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10 point decrease from baseline in GHS/QoL combined score, with confirmation. Per protocol, TTD in GHS/QoL combined score, for the first course of treatment, was compared between all participants of pembro mono arm and control arm as a pre-specified secondary analysis; and compared separately between all participants of pembro combo arm and control arm and is presented earlier in the record.
Analysis population: All participants in the pembro mono arm and the control arm who completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and had received ≥1 dose of study drug. Per protocol, the pembro combo arm was compared to the control arm separately and not included in this analysis.
Groups in this outcome
Pembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono)
Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for up to 35 cycles (up to \~2 years).
Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)
Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for up to 35 cycles (up to \~2 years); plus cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2 IV or carboplatin at a target area under the curve of 5 (AUC 5) IV, per Investigator's choice, on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle (6 cycle maximum \[up to \~4 months\]); plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m\^2/day IV continuous from Day 1-4 of each 3-week cycle (6 cycle maximum \[up to \~4 months\]).
Cetuximab + Chemotherapy (Control)
Participants received cetuximab on Day 1 at a dose of 400 mg/m\^2 IV, and then 250 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of each subsequent week until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity; plus cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2 IV or carboplatin AUC 5 IV (Investigator's choice) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle (6 cycle maximum \[up to \~4 months\] for platinum-based therapy); plus 5-FU 1000 mg/m\^2/day IV continuous from Day 1-4 of each 3-week cycle (6 cycle maximum \[up to \~4 months\]).
| Group | Source count |
|---|---|
| Pembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono) | 294 |
| Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo) | 0 |
| Cetuximab + Chemotherapy (Control) | 280 |
Reported measurements
Source class 1
| Group | Value | Spread | Lower | Upper | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono) | NA | Not reported | NA | NA | NA=Median and 95% confidence interval limits not reached due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. |
| Cetuximab + Chemotherapy (Control) | NA | Not reported | NA | NA | NA=Median and 95% confidence interval limits not reached due to an insufficient number of participants with the event. |
Source statistical analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.95
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 2.00
- group Description
- TTD in GHS/QoL combined score was compared between all participants of the pembro mono arm and the control arm. Comparison based on Cox regression model with Efron's method of tie handling with treatment as a covariate stratified by ECOG (0 vs. 1), HPV status (Positive vs. Negative) and PD-L1 TPS status (Strongly Positive, Not Strongly Positive).
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG002
- non Inferiority Type
- OTHER
- p Value
- 0.9530
- p Value Comment
- No formal hypothesis testing performed; nominal p-value provided for treatment comparison.
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 1.38
- statistical Method
- Regression, Cox
Complete source fields
- analyses
- ci Lower Limit
- 0.95
- ci Num Sides
- TWO_SIDED
- ci Pct Value
- 95
- ci Upper Limit
- 2.00
- group Description
- TTD in GHS/QoL combined score was compared between all participants of the pembro mono arm and the control arm. Comparison based on Cox regression model with Efron's method of tie handling with treatment as a covariate stratified by ECOG (0 vs. 1), HPV status (Positive vs. Negative) and PD-L1 TPS status (Strongly Positive, Not Strongly Positive).
- group Ids
- OG000
- OG002
- non Inferiority Type
- OTHER
- p Value
- 0.9530
- p Value Comment
- No formal hypothesis testing performed; nominal p-value provided for treatment comparison.
- param Type
- Hazard Ratio (HR)
- param Value
- 1.38
- statistical Method
- Regression, Cox
- classes
- categories
- measurements
- comment
- NA=Median and 95% confidence interval limits not reached due to an insufficient number of participants with the event.
- group Id
- OG000
- lower Limit
- NA
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- NA
- comment
- NA=Median and 95% confidence interval limits not reached due to an insufficient number of participants with the event.
- group Id
- OG002
- lower Limit
- NA
- upper Limit
- NA
- value
- NA
- denoms
- counts
- group Id
- OG000
- value
- 294
- group Id
- OG001
- value
- 0
- group Id
- OG002
- value
- 280
- units
- Participants
- description
- EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to the GHS question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" (Item 29) and the QoL question "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" (Item 30) were scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score indicating a better overall outcome. TTD in GHS/QoL defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a ≥10 point decrease from baseline in GHS/QoL combined score, with confirmation. Per protocol, TTD in GHS/QoL combined score, for the first course of treatment, was compared between all participants of pembro mono arm and control arm as a pre-specified secondary analysis; and compared separately between all participants of pembro combo arm and control arm and is presented earlier in the record.
- dispersion Type
- 95% Confidence Interval
- groups
- description
- Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for up to 35 cycles (up to \~2 years).
- id
- OG000
- title
- Pembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono)
- description
- Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for up to 35 cycles (up to \~2 years); plus cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2 IV or carboplatin at a target area under the curve of 5 (AUC 5) IV, per Investigator's choice, on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle (6 cycle maximum \[up to \~4 months\]); plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m\^2/day IV continuous from Day 1-4 of each 3-week cycle (6 cycle maximum \[up to \~4 months\]).
- id
- OG001
- title
- Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)
- description
- Participants received cetuximab on Day 1 at a dose of 400 mg/m\^2 IV, and then 250 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of each subsequent week until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity; plus cisplatin 100 mg/m\^2 IV or carboplatin AUC 5 IV (Investigator's choice) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle (6 cycle maximum \[up to \~4 months\] for platinum-based therapy); plus 5-FU 1000 mg/m\^2/day IV continuous from Day 1-4 of each 3-week cycle (6 cycle maximum \[up to \~4 months\]).
- id
- OG002
- title
- Cetuximab + Chemotherapy (Control)
- param Type
- MEDIAN
- population Description
- All participants in the pembro mono arm and the control arm who completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and had received ≥1 dose of study drug. Per protocol, the pembro combo arm was compared to the control arm separately and not included in this analysis.
- reporting Status
- POSTED
- time Frame
- Baseline up to approximately 12 months
- title
- Pembro Mono vs Control: TTD in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life (Items 29 and 30) Combined Score
- type
- SECONDARY
- unit Of Measure
- Months
Download exact source JSON → · Snapshot ctgov-results-191f4516d4760045304b24a0
Preserved source evidence · Not medical advice
Triangle